Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Two completely isolated busses

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
allthegooduseridsaregone(
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:06 pm    Post subject: Two completely isolated busses Reply with quote

I have what may be a somewhat unique situation, flying behind a Jabiru 5100
with its dual-alternator option. Each alternator is identical, integral to
the engine, permanent-magnet type, externally regulated, producing 25A Max
and 20A continuous. With "everything on", including pitot heat and landing
lights, etc., I'll need about 35A, exceeding the supply of just one
alternator. So I'll need to have them BOTH online for normal operations.

The thing is, I don't know of any way to wire two alternators to charge a
single battery safely. I think that this is a no-no.

So what I've been thinking is to use two smaller (identical) batteries, with
one alternator connected to each, independently. I'd have two completely
independent power busses, and arrange my avionics redundancy so that I could
fly with EITHER of them active. Of course I'd have them both on normally,
powering all of my stuff. But I could still make it home with just one side
or the other.

The only time that the two busses could OPTIONALLY be connected together, by
a third battery contactor, would be if I disconnected one of the alternators
.. tho' not sure how this would be accomplished for these permanent-magnet
alternators, short of adding still two MORE battery contactors (5
total?!?!). I'd do this to supply extra cranking juice on cold mornings,
for example.

Of course I'd need two ammeters, two low-voltage warnings, two ... you name
it. Two completely independent, isolated, and identical busses.

Does this make sense?

Thanks,
Greg


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 1:09 pm    Post subject: Two completely isolated busses Reply with quote

At 02:03 PM 12/12/2009, you wrote:
Quote:

<allthegooduseridsaregone(at)hotmail.com>

I have what may be a somewhat unique situation, flying behind a Jabiru 5100
with its dual-alternator option. Each alternator is identical, integral to
the engine, permanent-magnet type, externally regulated, producing 25A Max
and 20A continuous. With "everything on", including pitot heat and landing
lights, etc., I'll need about 35A, exceeding the supply of just one
alternator. So I'll need to have them BOTH online for normal operations.

The thing is, I don't know of any way to wire two alternators to charge a
single battery safely. I think that this is a no-no.

It CAN be done. I have done it. But it's not easy or
inexpensiver.

Quote:
So what I've been thinking is to use two smaller (identical) batteries, with
one alternator connected to each, independently. I'd have two completely
independent power busses, and arrange my avionics redundancy so that I could
fly with EITHER of them active. Of course I'd have them both on normally,
powering all of my stuff. But I could still make it home with just one side
or the other.

The only time that the two busses could OPTIONALLY be connected together, by
a third battery contactor, would be if I disconnected one of the alternators
... tho' not sure how this would be accomplished for these permanent-magnet
alternators, short of adding still two MORE battery contactors (5
total?!?!). I'd do this to supply extra cranking juice on cold mornings,
for example.

Of course I'd need two ammeters, two low-voltage warnings, two ... you name
it. Two completely independent, isolated, and identical busses.

See chapter 17 of the AeroElectric Connection and
particularly the discussion and notes on Figure Z-14
in the back of the book and available from the website
at:

http://www.aeroelectric.com/PPS/Adobe_Architecture_Pdfs/

and

http://www.aeroelectric.com/R12A/AppZ_12A4.pdf

What you propose is entirely feasible . . . in fact
recommended for the situation you've been given.
Bob . . .
////
(o o)
===========o00o=(_)=o00o=========
< Go ahead, make my day . . . >
< show me where I'm wrong. >
=================================


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
allthegooduseridsaregone(
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 9:20 am    Post subject: Two completely isolated busses Reply with quote

Thanks for the quick response, Bob. OK, so it looks like I'll go with the split bus. But I have a follow-on question/concern regarding the Z14 diagram's introduction:

"In normal operations, the crossfeed contactor is left open and the two systems operate independently of each other. Should one alternator fail, the crossfeed contactor may be used for the failed system to
borrow power from the working system."

Yes, that's how I see it working, as described initially. But wouldn't it be REALLY BAD to crossfeed when both alternators are still WORKING?

Well, I don't see in Z14N anywhere that closing the crossfeed will automatically disable either alternator. Shouldn't there at least be a manual means (e.g. split master/alt switch) to turn off the field of alternator A or B before closing the crossfeed? As currently shown in Z14N, turning off the master switch on one side would turn off the alternator field (good) but also turn off the battery contactor that is in series with the cross-feed (bad).

In MY case, with permanent-magnet alternators to turn off, I have no field wire of course so I'll use a relay in series with each alternator-to-regulator, as shown in Rotax Z16M. (I notice that you still haven't updated the Jabiru Z14 diagram to move that relay to the somewhat better alternator-to-regulator position rather than the regulator-to-battery position.)

I don't much like the fact that I'll have to remember to turn off a "failed" alternator before closing the crossfeed. What bad things would happen (and how quickly) if I forgot to do so, so that both of my permanent-magnet alternators were connected to the crossfed busses?

Thanks again,
Greg
[quote][b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:37 am    Post subject: Two completely isolated busses Reply with quote

At 11:16 AM 12/13/2009, you wrote:
Quote:
Thanks for the quick response, Bob. OK, so it looks like I'll go with the split bus. But I have a follow-on question/concern regarding the Z14 diagram's introduction:

"In normal operations, the crossfeed contactor is left open and the two systems operate independently of each other. Should one alternator fail, the crossfeed contactor may be used for the failed system to
borrow power from the working system."

Yes, that's how I see it working, as described initially. But wouldn't it be REALLY BAD to crossfeed when both alternators are still WORKING?

No . . . the alternator with the higher set-point
will hog the load. When it's capability limits are
reached, the bus voltage sags and the relaxed alternator
wakes up to carry the difference.

Now, this assumes that the dynamics of the two
regulators are not antagonistic to paralleled
operation . . . I've seen regulators designed
for slow response but tight voltage control go into
a see-saw oscillation when paralleled.

All of my regulator designs have gone for
stability under all conditions as opposed to
very tight voltage regulation. Further, regulators
for PM alternators are also fast response, loose
regulation so you're not going to see this phenomenon
pop up.
Quote:

Well, I don't see in Z14N anywhere that closing the crossfeed will automatically disable either alternator. Shouldn't there at least be a manual means (e.g. split master/alt switch) to turn off the field of alternator A or B before closing the crossfeed? As currently shown in Z14N, turning off the master switch on one side would turn off the alternator field (good) but also turn off the battery contactor that is in series with the cross-feed (bad).

Nope. No risks


Bob . . .
////
(o o)
===========o00o=(_)=o00o=========
< Go ahead, make my day . . . >
< show me where I'm wrong. >
=================================

[quote][b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group