|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
david(at)carneyaviation.c Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 3:54 am Post subject: flap flap again |
|
|
# AA-1B N9664L (at) ILG << has used flaps on T/O and lived to tell about it.
from the manufacturer's Owner's Manuals:
AA1 - flaps UP (pg 11), no change for soft-field takeoff (pg 15)
AA1A - flaps UP (pg 14), * * * modified for soft fields (pg 1 * * *
AA1B - flaps UP (pg 2-4), no change for soft fields (pg 3-3)
AA1C - don't have that book
I have no idea why the recommendation would be different for AA1A and AA1B.
For AA1A, the owner's manual sez
The soft field ground run can be reduced with the use of FULL
flap. The flap extended take-off technique is identical to that
with flaps retracted.
--------------------------------------------------
OK, now who had that formula for The Step?
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
aa1bflyboy(at)msn.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:52 am Post subject: flap flap again |
|
|
Thanks Dave. Actually my experiance with the flaps down on T/O was when I
was still a student pilot. I did a touch-n-go and forgot to raise them right
away. I did notice I left the ground almost imediately but after climbing to
about 100' AGL my climb performance went to shit. I then checked my flaps
and sure enough when raised 64L's climb improved a good bit. She never did
quit climbing though even with full flaps.
Do a lot, get a little;
Do a little, get a lot;
Do nothing, get it all.
Steve Roberts - AA-1B N9664L (at) ILG
----Original Message Follows----
From: "David Feinstein" <david(at)carneyaviation.com>
Reply-To: teamgrumman-list(at)matronics.com
To: <teamgrumman-list(at)matronics.com>
Subject: flap flap again
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:52:08 -0400
<david(at)carneyaviation.com>
# AA-1B N9664L (at) ILG << has used flaps on T/O and lived to tell about it.
from the manufacturer's Owner's Manuals:
AA1 - flaps UP (pg 11), no change for soft-field takeoff (pg 15)
AA1A - flaps UP (pg 14), * * * modified for soft fields (pg 1 * * *
AA1B - flaps UP (pg 2-4), no change for soft fields (pg 3-3)
AA1C - don't have that book
I have no idea why the recommendation would be different for AA1A and AA1B.
For AA1A, the owner's manual sez
The soft field ground run can be reduced with the use of FULL
flap. The flap extended take-off technique is identical to that
with flaps retracted.
--------------------------------------------------
OK, now who had that formula for The Step?
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamey
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 124
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 4:02 pm Post subject: flap flap again |
|
|
I'd be pretty surprised to fly a plane that didn't climb with flaps
deployed. I think the real fear is that you won't climb fast enough to
clear an obstacle rather than you won't climb period. Certainly at high
density altitudes you could presumably aggravate the climb gods enough by
dropping your flaps that maybe you'd be negative on the climb rate but this
should be fairly exceptional for most aircraft I'd think. I refer only to
familiar single and probably multi-engined GA aircraft and make no
assumptions about more exotic fare or anything that reports it's speed in
mach numbers. Are there common aircraft in anyone's experience that will
not climb under near standard conditions with flaps deployed?
Jamey
--
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
david(at)carneyaviation.c Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 2:56 am Post subject: flap flap again |
|
|
# I'd be pretty surprised to fly a plane that didn't climb with
# flaps deployed.
It's a certification requirement: 14 CFR 23.77-a-3
Don't know what rules apply to experimentals.
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
flyv35b(at)ashcreekwirele Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:37 am Post subject: flap flap again |
|
|
FAR 23.77(a)3 also says you don't have to show this sea level 3.3 percent
climb gradient with landing flaps IF the flaps can be retracted in 2 seconds
or less without loss of altitude. That probably precludes most electrically
operated flaps.
Maybe this is one reason why the 2 place Grummans have such small flaps that
don't offer much drag (or lift).
To answer Jamey's question I would be surprised if a Cessan 150 can climb
with it's big flaps fully lowered. If so, it's not much and probably won't
meet the FAR 23 requirements, but then it was not certified under part 23.
Also, there are a lot of planes that won't climb at higher density altitudes
with the flaps lowered.
Cliff A&P/IA
---
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrummanDude
Joined: 15 Jan 2006 Posts: 926 Location: Auburn, CA
|
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:53 am Post subject: flap flap again |
|
|
In a message dated 4/15/06 6:38:04 AM, flyv35b(at)ashcreekwireless.com writes:
Quote: | To answer Jamey's question I would be surprised if a Cessan 150 can climb
with it's big flaps fully lowered.=A0 If so, it's not much and probably won't
meet the FAR 23 requirements, but then it was not certified under part 23.
Also, there are a lot of planes that won't climb at higher density altitudes
with the flaps lowered.
|
Ken (LyCon) Tunnel's daughter was killed in a C-150 trying to climb out with
full flaps. She spun it into the ground from about 300 feet. Maybe a plane
CAN climb with full flaps. But, WHY?
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
_________________ Gary
AuCountry Aviation
Home of Team Grumman |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FLYaDIVE(at)aol.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 2:35 am Post subject: flap flap again |
|
|
In a message dated 4/15/06 2:54:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
TeamGrumman(at)aol.com writes:
Quote: | Ken (LyCon) Tunnel's daughter was killed in a C-150 trying to climb out with
full flaps. She spun it into the ground from about 300 feet. Maybe a
plane
CAN climb with full flaps. But, WHY?
========================
|
About 7 years ago, there was an accident at Linden AP (KLDJ), NJ when an
instructor took up a professional photographer for a photo shoot, it was in a
C-150 or 152. During take off the photographer moved his camera bag onto his lap
.. This pressed down the flap switch (which is panel located in front of the
copilot) to the full flap down position. The plane attained a few 100 feet
and then stalled and crashed on the departure end of the runway. There were
lucky things that day:
1 - No one was killed.
2 - The plane did not make it off the airport. A couple of 100 feet after
the end of the runway is a major road, Route 1. Right next to the road was a
gas station. Across the street is the Chrysler Assembly Plant.
RULE: Cockpit Clean - Manage your cockpit resources. And brief your
passengers and CoPilot!
To help me in my briefing I have a -
Placard for the CoPilot:
1 - Don't say anything
2 - Don't touch anything
And I rule I keep in mind:
CoPilot - Just another damn gage to watch!
Barry
"Chop'd Liver"
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamey
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 124
|
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 7:40 am Post subject: flap flap again |
|
|
I'm certainly not advocating the practice but having gone around in a DA-20,
C172, AA5B, and BE36 as part of flight training now all at some point from a
full flap configuration all of these has offered a definite full-flap
positive rate of climb as power was applied and prior to retracting flaps
though nothing near the appropriate climb configuration. It just seemed odd
to me that a small light aircraft where people and particularly students
would predictably be transitioning from a full-flap landing configuration to
a full-power climb on a go around would lack the ability to climb with the
flaps out.
My problem now is that I got used to using flaps only when needed for
landing the Tiger (if I was high/fast or what not) but with the A36 I'm
seldom high/fast with the gear out and prop flattenend out so I totally
forget to deploy the flaps. I need to do that more as it lowers the nose,
particularly with stuff in the back seats and actually does improve
low-speed behavior. This and I had the nav-lights on yesterday in the 36
(cruddy weather so I flipped the strobes, landing, nav-lights on) but this
dims the 3-position gear lights to the point of being undetectable in
daylight which caused me to go around at Hollister before I thought to cup
my hand carefully over the lights and really take a close look. Now no nav
lights unless at night for me. Still learning:)
Jamey
--
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrummanDude
Joined: 15 Jan 2006 Posts: 926 Location: Auburn, CA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 11:15 am Post subject: flap flap again |
|
|
In a message dated 4/16/06 8:40:42 AM, jamey(at)jamescourtney.net writes:
Quote: | My problem now is that I got used to using flaps only when needed for
landing the Tiger (if I was high/fast or what not) but with the A36 I'm
seldom high/fast with the gear out and prop flattenend out so I totally
forget to deploy the flaps.=A0
|
I always land with full flaps, in any wind. Flying into Lancaster one must
learn how to fly with a lot of nasty cross winds. I found full flaps were
nice for shortening the landing roll. I could exit off Bravo taxiway most=20of
the time in winds over 30 mph.
Gary
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
_________________ Gary
AuCountry Aviation
Home of Team Grumman |
|
Back to top |
|
|
flyv35b(at)ashcreekwirele Guest
|
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 11:32 am Post subject: flap flap again |
|
|
Quote: | My problem now is that I got used to using flaps only when needed for
landing the Tiger (if I was high/fast or what not) but with the A36 I'm
seldom high/fast with the gear out and prop flattenend out so I totally
forget to deploy the flaps. I need to do that more as it lowers the nose,
particularly with stuff in the back seats and actually does improve
low-speed behavior. This and I had the nav-lights on yesterday in the 36
(cruddy weather so I flipped the strobes, landing, nav-lights on) but this
dims the 3-position gear lights to the point of being undetectable in
daylight which caused me to go around at Hollister before I thought to cup
my hand carefully over the lights and really take a close look. Now no
nav
lights unless at night for me. Still learning:)
|
Not to mention the significant reduction in stall speed with flaps down in
the Bonanza. If you ever go into a short field, say 1800 ft, you definitely
are going to want the flaps down, probably all the way. I almost always
land with full flaps in the Bonanza as I do in any of the Grummans. Turning
on the nav lights does dim the gear warning lights and I have also had to
look twice to see if they are on even at dusk with the nav lights on. Under
normal circumstances I think it is a good idea to land with flaps in all
airplanes, unless their is some overriding reason not to.
Cliff
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamey
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 124
|
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:21 pm Post subject: flap flap again |
|
|
We get a lot of x-wind at KSQL and so I frequently don't use flaps in the
Grumman but as you say, may as well use them in whatever plane if conditions
are favorable and save the brakes:)
Jamey
--
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
flyv35b(at)ashcreekwirele Guest
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 6:00 am Post subject: flap flap again |
|
|
Having a x-wing doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't use flaps.
---
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamey
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 124
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:31 am Post subject: flap flap again |
|
|
"Having a x-wing doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't use flaps."
The lack of flaps is probably what put Luke in the swamp on Dagobah.
<yoda>Use flaps you shall, hmmmm.</yoda>
Seriously, that was a choice typo Cliff:)
Your point is well taken though. I'll make more use of my flaps.
Jamey
--
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|