Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Anouncement MT compared to Hartzel

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> TeamGrumman-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Discover



Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 429

PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:37 am    Post subject: Anouncement MT compared to Hartzel Reply with quote

The spinner assembly is also included with the MT.

The MT is not inexpensive but until our resident rocket scientist and Grumman Guy gets the O360B1E approved it's the only game in town for a controllable pitch prop.


Comparing to your Bonanza prop is really an apples to oranges comparison.

The Hartzell being hydraulic while the MT is electric with the associated computer controller box that senses rpm and issues electronic signals to the motor to make fine pitch adjustments. All this technology costs more than the older hydraulic technology.
In addition, the MT has features the Hartzell does not have. The MT can be put in manual mode allowing the prop to function like a fixed pitch prop. This has a few advantages one being that you can lean to best power by watching your Tach. Can't do that with a hydraulic prop.

Hartzell does make an electric controlled prop so there is really no comparison.
But let's run the numbers anyway:
If your not getting some kind of discount then the hydraulic Hartzell for an O360 powered Cessna is $9750 It also weighs 67 lbs; 13 lbs more than the MT.
Let's see using the estimate of $1500 for a governor, Hartzel costs $9750 + $1500 = $11,250 compared to the MT at $11,232 for the first 10 purchasers until March 15.

So the MT is less than the Hartzell!

Considering all the above it's really not a bad deal.

Your Fellow Grumman Enthusiast,
ned


[quote] Forgot to mention that the price I mentioned INCLUDED the spinner assembly.

Cliff
[b]


- The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Discover



Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 429

PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:46 am    Post subject: Anouncement MT compared to Hartzel Reply with quote

typo correction where it says Hartel does make change to does NOT make
[quote] ---


- The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
flyv35b(at)minetfiber.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:51 am    Post subject: Anouncement MT compared to Hartzel Reply with quote

The Hartzell being hydraulic while the MT is electric with the associated computer controller box that senses rpm and issues electronic signals to the motor to make fine pitch adjustments. All this technology costs more than the older hydraulic technology.


Are you sure the MT prop for the Bonanza is electric?

In addition, the MT has features the Hartzell does not have. The MT can be put in manual mode allowing the prop to function like a fixed pitch prop. This has a few advantages one being that you can lean to best power by watching your Tach. Can't do that with a hydraulic prop.

I wouldn't want to lean that way. It's a crude way of leaning.

Cliff

[quote] ---


- The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List
Back to top
GrummanDude



Joined: 15 Jan 2006
Posts: 926
Location: Auburn, CA

PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:20 pm    Post subject: Anouncement MT compared to Hartzel Reply with quote

My bottom line will be predicated on weight.




--


- The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List

_________________
Gary
AuCountry Aviation
Home of Team Grumman
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
flyv35b(at)minetfiber.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 12:38 pm    Post subject: Anouncement MT compared to Hartzel Reply with quote

The composite blade props will be lighter weight than and all aluminum blade. I seem to recall that Hartzell is now making a composite blade prop for experimental use. If you are starting with a whole different engine model why not look at a lighter weight composite prop. I just think that with MT's requirement to ship the prop back to one service center and maybe weight weeks for it to get repaired as compared to having most any prop shop repair a Hartzell has to be a detracting factor for the MT. I know of one experimental owner who had a MT who waited weeks and weeks to get a governor for his MT prop from Germany.

Cliff
[quote] ---


- The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List
Back to top
Discover



Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 429

PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:36 pm    Post subject: Anouncement MT compared to Hartzel Reply with quote

I was comenting on your comparison and trying to connect that comparison to what is actually available. Hartzell props are not electric but hydraulic.

On the leaning for best power by using the Tach. That is the method prescribed in the Lycoming Engine Operators Book and it seems to work very well. Can you tell me a better way to lean for best power?
[quote]


Are you sure the MT prop for the Bonanza is electric?

In addition, the MT has features the Hartzell does not have. The MT can be put in manual mode allowing the prop to function like a fixed pitch prop. This has a few advantages one being that you can lean to best power by watching your Tach. Can't do that with a hydraulic prop.

I wouldn't want to lean that way. It's a crude way of leaning.

Cliff

[b]


- The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Discover



Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 429

PostPosted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:44 pm    Post subject: Anouncement MT compared to Hartzel Reply with quote

When was it that the experimental owner waitd weeks to get a governor? Was it perhaps several years ago? The required governor is stocked by Van's htese days and manuy other supply houses. I bought the PCU 5000 which works for the MT for my RV9A Whirlwing prop about 5 years ago from a shop in Illinois and it took 3 days shipping to receive.

I will be getting my 6 year TBO on my MT prop done this month in Oxnard. It is expected to take one week and most of that time is the 4 days round trip shipping.

It just sounds like you don't like the idea of MT props in general?

Are you saying that MT props are not a good thing for the Tiger?
Ned

..... I just think that with MT's requirement to ship the prop back to one service center and maybe weight weeks for it to get repaired as compared to having most any prop shop repair a Hartzell has to be a detracting factor for the MT. I know of one experimental owner who had a MT who waited weeks and weeks to get a governor for his MT prop from Germany.
Cliff
[quote][b]


- The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> TeamGrumman-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group