blackoaks(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:35 pm Post subject: GPU connection philosophy WAS: Re: GPU for Piper |
|
|
Bob, Could you expand on the two philosophies or point me to a further discussion. I've been wrestling with both ways and each time I decide one way, I think about it some more and change my mind...again? Is either choice superior or is it six of one and half a dozen of the other?
As usual, thanks for all the thought and knowledge you share with all of us.
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com (nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com)> wrote:
Quote: | --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com (nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com)>
<snip>You also need to see how the ship's battery
is tied to the system when ground power is plugged
in. Some manufacturers tied their ground power
to the battery side of the battery contactor.
This allowed charging a battery externally without
having the whole airplane "hot". Others tied it
to the bus such that ground power could operated
the airplane with the ship's battery contactor
open. There are good reasons for either philosophy,
you need to know which one has been applied to
your airplane. <snip>
|
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|