blackoaks(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:35 pm Post subject: GPU connection philosophy WAS: Re: GPU for Piper |
|
|
Bob, Could you expand on the two philosophies or point me to� a further discussion.� I've been wrestling with both ways and each time I decide one way, I think about it some more and change my mind...again?� Is either choice superior or is it six of one and half a dozen of the other?
As usual, thanks for all the thought and knowledge you share with all of us.
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com (nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com)> wrote:
Quote: | --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com (nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com)>
� <snip>You also need to see how the ship's battery
� is tied to the system when ground power is plugged
� in. Some manufacturers tied their ground power
� to the battery side of the battery contactor.
� This allowed charging a battery externally without
� having the whole airplane "hot". Others tied it
� to the bus such that ground power could operated
� the airplane with the ship's battery contactor
� open. There are good reasons for either philosophy,
� you need to know which one has been applied to
� your airplane. <snip>
|
�
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|