|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JVanLaak(at)aol.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:35 pm Post subject: ADI Impressions - Long |
|
|
Listers,
I have been flying a Tru Track ADI for about 10 hours now and thought I
would share my early impressions with folks. The flying has all been VFR
although I am an experienced IFR pilot (Ex-AF) but not current. I should also note
that I bought the ADI in part because I was not comfortable relying on the
Dynon that I had installed 2 years ago. The reliability issues I had with the
Dynon were dealt with by the company but I just never really felt like I was
getting the right data from the instrument. It just did not "feel" right,
and having had a failure of the main ADI in bad weather in a fighter years ago
I wanted to address that before trying to get IFR current again.
So right after Christmas I bought the ADI and waited expectantly for it to
show up. I say bought because my credit card was charged right away despite
the fact that it took over 2 months for it to be delivered. High demand they
said, but it will be coming " next week."
It finally did come in mid March and I excitedly took it out of the box and
hooked it up to power. The pitch system worked but made a rubbing sound.
The roll function was completely inop. Then I noticed that the case had a
bulge on the left side.
Not a happy camper I sent an email to Tru Trak immediately telling them they
had a quality problem. I got a note back from the service manager asking me
to send it right back and they would fix it. About 5 days later I got an
email indicating that one of the cards had come out of its mount and was jammed
in the case, binding the pitch mechanism. Their speculation was that it was
jarred out by shipment, but that seems unlikely to me. Regardless, they
repaired the unit and sent it back express so I got it into the plane and
working the next weekend.
It is definitely different from a regular attitude indicator. As many of
you know, both the pitch and roll signals come from rate sensors not a normal
gyro platform. So a pitch input is indicated in the normal way but the
amplitude of the movement soon reverts to a rate of climb indication. It is hard
to describe but works pretty intuitively in practice. Likewise the roll
indication initially comes from a roll sensor but then if you held knife-edge
flight it would revert to show wings level. But in normal coordinated turns the
roll sensor hands off to a yaw sensor in a nearly seamless way and it
operates very much like a normal attitude indicator.
A few of the funny things I have noticed so far. 1. The pitch indication
looks extreme on departure with an RV's rate of climb. Even my timid 160 hp
with fixed pitch prop does 1000 fpm and that is a BIG pitch indication on the
scale. It would be easy for them to tone that down some and that will be a
recommendation when I get more time on it. The down-indication is less of a
problem.
Normal under the hood flying works just fine. In fact level turns are
extremely easy with the vertical velocity what you are actually flying. And the
instantaneous pitch sensor addresses most of the lag of the traditional VS
indicator.
The roll sensor maxes out at 30 degrees and a red arrow flashes to tell you
to roll out if you exceed that angle. You obviously cannot do steep turns
that way which is something of a problem. Likewise it is unclear what happens
in a truly serious unusual attitude. I will experiment at some point but
have not done so yet. Finally, if you fly level and slow down until you
approach the stall the pitch indicator stays level and then starts to go down as the
sink rate increases even though the nose is way up. The only indication on
the screen is a flashing "AS" for airspeed.
Bottom line is I think I like it and am looking forward to some serious hood
work to check it out. BUT I have decided to move the Dynon to the right
side of the panel as a full performance back up instrument as well as an
all-in-one instrument for guest pilots. But it addresses the extreme attitude
situation and will offer a nice back up to this EXPERIMENTAL instrument.
It seems to be a good addition to the homebuilt suite. BTW, I have no
interest in investing in the AOA function they are adding. I am not a big AOA fan
(despite hundreds of hours with them) and I really don't care for this
implementation.
Jim Van Laak
RV-6 N79RL
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|