tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.c
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 3:42 pm Post subject: MGL Avionics vs Dynon Attitude Response |
 |
|
Gidday,
I am very interested in both of these Manufacturers, the MGL Odyssey/Voyager or the Dynon 180/Skyview. The issues I see are the response rates of their Artificial Horizons. The MGL seem to have little lag.
I would like to know if the Dynon has a lag, or whether Dynon owners might be able to take a look at this link and tell me if they think theirs is quicker or slower. Here is a link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frgSRmrouqo
Also, the MGL seems to be very flexible with mapping solutions, and very tailorable in how you present your information, as the device can be plugged into a PC, and all the presentations can be manipulated to an eye pleasing outcome.
I think Dynon is less flexible, but does offer I think 9 presentations, which is a heck of a lot. Dynon however seems to be far less flexible with the mapping. In truth, I think I will be using a Garmin AERA as my primary navigation device with its airspace alarms etc, as the information seems more stable, unless of course the Dynon mapping and Airspace is stable and reliable, if in fact I choose that over the MGL Voyager. BUT, the way it presents flight instruments, principally Attidude, is my primary decider, so back to my original question...................does the Dynon compare???
Reg
Tony Renshaw
Sydney Aussie
| | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |
|
|
|
Get Email Distribution Too!
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
