Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Experimental Aircraft AD complience discussion

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Yak-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mark.bitterlich(at)navy.m
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 12:31 pm    Post subject: Experimental Aircraft AD complience discussion Reply with quote

Gents, this included paragraph is the response I got from the EAA
concerning this issue and is EXCELLENT INFO for all of us to keep on
hand. I consider this the last word on the matter IMHO.

Have a great Memorial Day weekend.

Mark Bitterlich

"Concerning the AD concerns and applicability. I understand the points
made in the March 26, 2003 memorandum from the FAA New England Region's
acting regional counsel, however I believe that information is outdated
and no longer applicable. I contacted EAA who in turn contacted the
Manager, Aircraft Maintenance Division, AFS-300 for the current FAA
national guidance on the AD vs. experimental aircraft applicability
issue. The current FAA national policy per Mr. Ron Wojnar, AFS-304, is:
"Existing regulations do not support enforcement of ADs on TC, PMA, and
TSO components installed on non-TCed aircraft. Some ADs may apply to
FAA approved products installed on non-TCed aircraft, but compliance is
not mandatory because the aircraft is not TCed. However, the rules in
part 43 governing the maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding,
and alteration of these aircraft do not apply. The owner or operator of
a non-TCed aircraft is responsible for its design and maintenance.
The FAA encourages owners and operators of these aircraft to comply
with ADs, but the operator may mitigate safety risks in some other way,
without obtaining alternative methods of compliance from the FAA." With
this guidance in mind I do plan on reviewing AD's issued against the
engine and propeller installed on my aircraft to determine their flight
safety applicability per FAR 91.319(b). I will also make the following
logbook entry to indicate that a flight safety determination has been
made: "I certify that AD Number _________________ has been reviewed on
______________(date)."


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Yak-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group