Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Joining RG58 to RG400

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
allthegooduseridsaregone(
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 7:42 am    Post subject: Joining RG58 to RG400 Reply with quote

I constructed my empennage in 2003 (hard to believe it's been that long!)
from fiberglass with four internal RST copper foil antenna (COM1, COM2, VOR,
ELT) plus a MB antenna running down the fiberglass dorsal fin. I used Radio
Shack RG58 coax at the time 'coz it was conveniently available as I was
closing out the empennage -- following the RST directions for baluns on the
connection between foil and coax. I used 40-ish foot lengths of the RG58
from each antenna (coiled up for now) to leave me plenty to reach the back
of the instrument panel without any break.

A year-ish later, I learned via this forum of the much lighter, slimmer, and
more elegant RG400 coax. I bought five 15-foot lengths of RG400, with male
BNCs attached on each end, through a "bulk purchase" offered in this forum
in 2004 (hard to believe it's been that long!).

So now, as I'm finally getting around to routing my wires and coax forward,
I'd like to cut off each of the RG58's just behind the rear seats (where I
can still easily reach them) and connect to the RG400's for the remaining
14-ish foot trip forward to the rear of the panel.

Should I install a female BNC connector on the RG58 for connecting to the
mail BNC on the RG400, or can I directly splice the RG58 to the RG400 ...
while doing my best to maintain a continuous outer shielding across the
transition?

Or would I be asking for trouble (e.g. mismatched impedance reflections) by
mixing RG58 with RG400 ... so just continue with the RG58 all the way
forward?

Thanks,
Greg


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 7:53 am    Post subject: Joining RG58 to RG400 Reply with quote

Quote:

Or would I be asking for trouble (e.g. mismatched impedance reflections) by
mixing RG58 with RG400 ... so just continue with the RG58 all the way

The performance difference between the two materials is slight.
Your VHF radios are not going to work better in any observable way.
I think the drive is going to be parts count. The act of splicing
the two feeders together adds a handful of parts with the
additional risk of future failure. If it's not practical to
replace the 58 with contiguous lengths of 400, I think I'd
opt to leave the 58 in place. But a cable male/female joint
would be quite acceptable too.

http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Connectors/Coax/BNC_Cable_Female_1.jpg

http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Connectors/Coax/BNC_Cable_Male.jpg

Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
longg(at)pjm.com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 11:50 am    Post subject: Joining RG58 to RG400 Reply with quote

Greg,

Welcome to 2010 Smile Hey, time to get building. I did the same on my NAV
(joined it with a female) and found no difference in quality. They are
all rated at 50 ohms. Truthfully, I've never been able to justify the
added cost of the pure RG400 plumbing over the RG58 plumbing. I've also
got 142 plumbing. The RG58 radios work just as well as those with the $$
wire. Of course we could also open a thesis on location, type and
quality of antenna installations. Oh boy.

The more technically wire adept will differ but if you sat in my plane
you'd never know the difference.

Glenn

--


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group