 |
Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
danweseman(at)yahoo.com
Guest
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 6:41 am Post subject: south taxi way |
 |
|
Dan Weseman
danweseman(at)yahoo.com
www.flycleanex.com
www.fly5thbearing.com
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Sabina Pryce-Jones <sabinapj(at)gmail.com>
To: Daniel Weseman <danweseman(at)yahoo.com>
Sent: Sat, September 11, 2010 10:25:57 AM
Subject: Re: south taxi way
Dan
I agree with your approach. Let's wait to see what the engineer says. Then we should probably move forward as lot owners with the DEP on permitting driveway and utility easement through the wetlands. I also have a friend who use to work at DEP who I will consult with.
Thanks
Sabina
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 11, 2010, at 8:45 AM, Daniel Weseman <danweseman(at)yahoo.com (danweseman(at)yahoo.com)> wrote:
[quote]
Pat ,To secure the easment for T&G I need to know where our taxiway will connect. The two factors that determine this are
1. The decision on the "wetland area"
Per your email we will know more about this Monday.
2. The power pole at the corner of Airpark east and south.
Ed Witt is handeling this and will let us know what Clay electric says. Per the current "aggrement "with Bob Weseman and Buzz Glade we need to stick to our origanal plan. the power pole can be moved 10ft south or removed and run underground from the next pole north (best option in my opinin)
Also i think it may be best if The lot owners with the wetlands (Rachel and I and Sabina) file fill permits for 30ft wide access and utilites. This was the easy part of my last dealing with DEP. The area is tiny and unless alot has changed will not need to be mitigated. If we do it as a group .... they will see this as a development!!!
So I think to get the easment correct we need to wait for information from Clay Electric and the Enviormental Enginer this week. I will then work with Bob and Buzz and we will move foward.
Thanks
Dan Weseman
danweseman(at)yahoo.com (danweseman(at)yahoo.com)
www.flycleanex.com
www.fly5thbearing.com
From: "pdleeinfla(at)aol.com" <pdleeinfla(at)aol.com>
To: 1captdon1(at)att.net; jaxvanderbilt(at)comcast.net; weseman(at)cproducts.net; Sabinapj(at)gmail.com; danweseman(at)yahoo.com; davedollarhide(at)msn.com; ewittsr(at)mecojax.com
Sent: Wed, September 8, 2010 9:24:33 PM
Subject: Updates
Ladies and gents, Thanks for the input. I will tell Sarah to make changes to match bylaws and to clarify common areas to be taxiway easements where necessary. We have been talking to SJRWMD about our wetland issue. We all knew it was an issue, but the question was basically: how do we address it? I talked to a wetland consultant tonight that is going to give us advice as to how to proceed and what our options really are. Steve Hakala is a friend of Dave Vanderbilt and was very helpful over the phone. His cost is $150. He will look at the area next Monday and tell us the best way to proceed.
Over the phone he said there are several options. The first is to avoid the wetland. We can do that by doing an S around the marked wet area. I went down today and marked off a taxiway that goes north around the wetland (in the Weseman's property) and joins the road about 60 feet north of where we would like to join. I marked the entrance with PVC pipes with blue tops. Take a look and let me know what you think. If we do this option, the power pole will not have to be moved but we will need a few feet from Buzz Glade to make the turn. We would also have to get an OK from Dan and Rachel. (Maybe trade some clearing for more easement). The second option is to go the permitting route. That would involve some cost and probably some mitigation (more cost). DEP and the Corp of Engineers will get involved. Neither are good as far as I can tell. The last option is to have a wetlands guy say that where we want to taxi is not a wetland. If he can convince the state, then we can do what we want. All of these options need to start with someone that knows what they are talking about. So I recommend we wait and listen to a pro tell us what we should do. That will happen Monday
In the mean time the loggers are clearing and raking. The look from the air is really great.
Pat
[b]
| | - The Matronics Rocket-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Rocket-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
danweseman(at)yahoo.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 7:08 am Post subject: south taxi way |
|
|
Sorry this was sent to the wrong address
Dan Weseman
danweseman(at)yahoo.com
www.flycleanex.com
www.fly5thbearing.com
From: Daniel Weseman <danweseman(at)yahoo.com>
To: rocket-list(at)matronics.com
Sent: Sat, September 11, 2010 10:38:03 AM
Subject: Fw: south taxi way
Dan Weseman
danweseman(at)yahoo.com
www.flycleanex.com
www.fly5thbearing.com
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Sabina Pryce-Jones <sabinapj(at)gmail.com>
To: Daniel Weseman <danweseman(at)yahoo.com>
Sent: Sat, September 11, 2010 10:25:57 AM
Subject: Re: south taxi way
Dan
I agree with your approach. Let's wait to see what the engineer says. Then we should probably move forward as lot owners with the DEP on permitting driveway and utility easement through the wetlands. I also have a friend who use to work at DEP who I will consult with.
Thanks
Sabina
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 11, 2010, at 8:45 AM, Daniel Weseman <danweseman(at)yahoo.com (danweseman(at)yahoo.com)> wrote:
[quote]
Pat ,To secure the easment for T&G I need to know where our taxiway will connect. The two factors that determine this are
1. The decision on the "wetland area"
Per your email we will know more about this Monday.
2. The power pole at the corner of Airpark east and south.
Ed Witt is handeling this and will let us know what Clay electric says. Per the current "aggrement "with Bob Weseman and Buzz Glade we need to stick to our origanal plan. the power pole can be moved 10ft south or removed and run underground from the next pole north (best option in my opinin)
Also i think it may be best if The lot owners with the wetlands (Rachel and I and Sabina) file fill permits for 30ft wide access and utilites. This was the easy part of my last dealing with DEP. The area is tiny and unless alot has changed will not need to be mitigated. If we do it as a group .... they will see this as a development!!!
So I think to get the easment correct we need to wait for information from Clay Electric and the Enviormental Enginer this week. I will then work with Bob and Buzz and we will move foward.
Thanks
Dan Weseman
danweseman(at)yahoo.com (danweseman(at)yahoo.com)
www.flycleanex.com
www.fly5thbearing.com
From: "pdleeinfla(at)aol.com" <pdleeinfla(at)aol.com>
To: 1captdon1(at)att.net; jaxvanderbilt(at)comcast.net; weseman(at)cproducts.net; Sabinapj(at)gmail.com; danweseman(at)yahoo.com; davedollarhide(at)msn.com; ewittsr(at)mecojax.com
Sent: Wed, September 8, 2010 9:24:33 PM
Subject: Updates
Ladies and gents, Thanks for the input. I will tell Sarah to make changes to match bylaws and to clarify common areas to be taxiway easements where necessary. We have been talking to SJRWMD about our wetland issue. We all knew it was an issue, but the question was basically: how do we address it? I talked to a wetland consultant tonight that is going to give us advice as to how to proceed and what our options really are. Steve Hakala is a friend of Dave Vanderbilt and was very helpful over the phone. His cost is $150. He will look at the area next Monday and tell us the best way to proceed.
Over the phone he said there are several options. The first is to avoid the wetland. We can do that by doing an S around the marked wet area. I went down today and marked off a taxiway that goes north around the wetland (in the Weseman's property) and joins the road about 60 feet north of where we would like to join. I marked the entrance with PVC pipes with blue tops. Take a look and let me know what you think. If we do this option, the power pole will not have to be moved but we will need a few feet from Buzz Glade to make the turn. We would also have to get an OK from Dan and Rachel. (Maybe trade some clearing for more easement). The second option is to go the permitting route. That would involve some cost and probably some mitigation (more cost). DEP and the Corp of Engineers will get involved. Neither are good as far as I can tell. The last option is to have a wetlands guy say that where we want to taxi is not a wetland. If he can convince the state, then we can do what we want. All of these options need to start with someone that knows what they are talking about. So I recommend we wait and listen to a pro tell us what we should do. That will happen Monday
In the mean time the loggers are clearing and raking. The look from the air is really great.
Pat
==================
[/b][b]
| | - The Matronics Rocket-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Rocket-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
Get Email Distribution Too!
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
