Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Full control movement?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV10-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dick Sipp



Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 215
Location: Hope, MI

PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 4:53 pm    Post subject: Full control movement? Reply with quote

I have noticed in many of the pictures of panels and interiors that the depth of the instrument panel and height of the stick is clearly going to limit full nose down
elevator. Perhaps folks think they will never need full nose down elevator. While we are not supposed to spin the airplane intentionally I am concerned that recovery from an inadvertent spin might be slowed or impossible with limited forward stick travel. I wonder how folks with panel extensions and full length sticks are meeting the design elevator travel limits.

On my airplane the panel is about 1/2 inch deeper than stock. By shortening the vertical straight portion of the stick to as short as possible and still mount an unmodified grip, I have the clearance necessary to get full down elevator. The stick ends up about two inches forward of the lower edge of the panel at the full nose down position.

Dick Sipp
N110DV 300 hours
[quote][b]


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rene(at)felker.com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:36 pm    Post subject: Full control movement? Reply with quote

I added a short extension to the curved portion of the stick, creating additional bend. Both sticks clear the panel.

I used pictures on Scott Schmidt’s site. There should be messages in the archive.

Do not archive

Rene'
801-721-6080


From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dick & Vicki Sipp
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 6:49 PM
To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Full control movement?

I have noticed in many of the pictures of panels and interiors that the depth of the instrument panel and height of the stick is clearly going to limit full nose down

elevator.  Perhaps folks think they will never need full nose down elevator. While we are not supposed to spin the airplane intentionally I am concerned that recovery from an inadvertent spin might be slowed or impossible with limited forward stick travel. I wonder how folks with panel extensions and full length sticks are meeting the design elevator travel limits.



On my airplane the panel is about 1/2 inch deeper than stock. By shortening the vertical straight portion of the stick to as short as possible and still mount an unmodified grip, I have the clearance necessary to get full down elevator. The stick ends up about two inches forward of the lower edge of the panel at the full nose down position.



Dick Sipp

N110DV 300 hours
Quote:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
0
Quote:
1
Quote:
2
Quote:
3
Quote:
4
Quote:
5
Quote:
6
Quote:
7
[quote][b]


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:23 pm    Post subject: Full control movement? Reply with quote

I haven't got to the point of having my panel installed and a stick grip to test, so this is a 'off the cuff' remark.
I fly a Pitts .... well, let's say I hang on tight .... so that's where my comments comes from.
If there is interference with the panel, it's not going to make a whole lot of difference in elevator throw. Bending the curve a little more will help or eliminate the problem.
To address your spin scenario, proper spin recovery is to briskly apply rudder opposite the spin to stop rotation and then apply forward stick (with neutral rudder at this point) to get airflow over the control surfaces. How much forward stick depends on the size of the elevators, and the elevators on the -10 appear to be more than sufficient.

Most non-aerobatic pilots would have to really fight to push that stick full forward ..... it's a real unnatural act. As soon as the butt gets light in the seat, they change their mind.

I have yet to hear of the spin characteristics of the -10 so don't have any data. From what I see, looking at the -10, is that it should be very controllable entering and exiting a spin. I'm sure it's been spun, but nobody wants to be flamed for it. I also think inadvertent spins are due to poor piloting skills.

Another way to look at the situation .... how many times do you pull full stick?? Ever?? In any non aerobatic airplane??? Well, go yank on the up elevator and feel the Gs ..... and picture that same feeling up against the seatbelt pushing.

I guess I'm trying to say I don't think it's really a problem.
Linn

On 9/15/2010 8:48 PM, Dick & Vicki Sipp wrote: [quote] I have noticed in many of the pictures of panels and interiors that the depth of the instrument panel and height of the stick is clearly going to limit full nose down
elevator. Perhaps folks think they will never need full nose down elevator. While we are not supposed to spin the airplane intentionally I am concerned that recovery from an inadvertent spin might be slowed or impossible with limited forward stick travel. I wonder how folks with panel extensions and full length sticks are meeting the design elevator travel limits.

On my airplane the panel is about 1/2 inch deeper than stock. By shortening the vertical straight portion of the stick to as short as possible and still mount an unmodified grip, I have the clearance necessary to get full down elevator. The stick ends up about two inches forward of the lower edge of the panel at the full nose down position.

Dick Sipp
N110DV 300 hours
Quote:

[b]


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
aerosport1



Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 231

PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:29 pm    Post subject: Full control movement? Reply with quote

Dick if you look at vans required throw
For the rv-10 it is 20-25 degree.
I think that with proper adjustment and sticks
At reasonable lenghts there should be no
Problems at all. Some people might have a problem
If they make there sticks to long. Even
With the standard panel there could be a problem.
I have been in a 10 with a stock panel and
The stick goes under the panel at full deflection.
It missed the bottom of the panel by 1/4".
That would worry me more than hitting the
Panel.
Just FWIW
Geoff

Sent from my iPhone Geoff

On Sep 15, 2010, at 8:48 PM, "Dick & Vicki Sipp" <rsipp(at)earthlink.net (rsipp(at)earthlink.net)> wrote:

[quote] I have noticed in many of the pictures of panels and interiors that the depth of the instrument panel and height of the stick is clearly going to limit full nose down
elevator. Perhaps folks think they will never need full nose down elevator. While we are not supposed to spin the airplane intentionally I am concerned that recovery from an inadvertent spin might be slowed or impossible with limited forward stick travel. I wonder how folks with panel extensions and full length sticks are meeting the design elevator travel limits.

On my airplane the panel is about 1/2 inch deeper than stock. By shortening the vertical straight portion of the stick to as short as possible and still mount an unmodified grip, I have the clearance necessary to get full down elevator. The stick ends up about two inches forward of the lower edge of the panel at the full nose down position.

Dick Sipp
N110DV 300 hours
Quote:


href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution


[b]


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List

_________________
Geoff Combs
RV-10 QB N829GW
Flying 500 hrs
40033
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmaib(at)mac.com
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Sep 16, 2010 4:08 am    Post subject: Full control movement? Reply with quote

My SteinAir panel is a bit lower than the stock panel and I have Infinity grips. I had to put just a slight bit more bend in the sticks to insure clearance.

David Maib
40559
Flying




On Sep 15, 2010, at 8:48 PM, Dick & Vicki Sipp wrote:
I have noticed in many of the pictures of panels and interiors that the depth of the instrument panel and height of the stick is clearly going to limit full nose down
elevator. Perhaps folks think they will never need full nose down elevator. While we are not supposed to spin the airplane intentionally I am concerned that recovery from an inadvertent spin might be slowed or impossible with limited forward stick travel. I wonder how folks with panel extensions and full length sticks are meeting the design elevator travel limits.

On my airplane the panel is about 1/2 inch deeper than stock. By shortening the vertical straight portion of the stick to as short as possible and still mount an unmodified grip, I have the clearance necessary to get full down elevator. The stick ends up about two inches forward of the lower edge of the panel at the full nose down position.

Dick Sipp
N110DV 300 hours
Quote:


href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution



- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
Bob Turner



Joined: 03 Jan 2009
Posts: 885
Location: Castro Valley, CA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:36 am    Post subject: Re: Full control movement? Reply with quote

There's a bit of manufacturing tolerance in the sticks and/or attach hardware. I had to bend one stick a bit, while the other was okay! (stock panel).

- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List

_________________
Bob Turner
RV-10 QB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV10-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group