|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
danb
Joined: 29 Sep 2010 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:16 am Post subject: AMPS? |
|
|
Hello, I am currently wiring my 912uls which has the heavy duty starter. I was not sure how many amps it drew and have had trouble finding this info (I'm sure it's nesteled somewhere in the Rotax pages).
The question: How many amps will it draw and what size wire should be run to the starter? My Kitfox came with #6AWG, however it was written prior to the heavy duty starter development. Has the amp draw changed?
Thanks,
Dan B
Mesa, AZ
Kitfox IV
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Float Flyr
Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 2704 Location: Campbellton, Newfoundland
|
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:20 pm Post subject: AMPS? |
|
|
It depends on how far the run will be from your battery to the starter
itself. The longer the run the bigger the wire you will be needing. While
you are at it make sure the grounds coming back to the battery from the
engine are hefty too.
Let us know how long your run will be and then we can make an estimation on
the gauge of wire to use. I say we because I'm sure this is the kind of
question that will get lots of replies.
Noel
--
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
_________________ Noel Loveys
Kitfox III-A
Aerocet 1100 Floats |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan(at)azshowersolutions. Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 3:17 am Post subject: AMPS? |
|
|
Noel,
Thanks for the reply. The positive run between my battery and main contactor
is 6". From there I go to a starter contactor which is about 6" more...then I go
through the firewall to the starter which will be no more than 15" away. So
total distance from Batt to starter let's say 30" for a round number. I have a
copper grounding bus that operates back to back on the firewall. I'm using a #2
stranded grounding strap to the engine. I realize the bigger the conductor used
the better, but if I can use the # 6 wire behind the firewall without buying
more wire, terminals, etc...that would be good.
Thanks for your help
Dan
---
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Float Flyr
Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 2704 Location: Campbellton, Newfoundland
|
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 7:35 am Post subject: AMPS? |
|
|
Initially, a starter can draw as much as 80A to 100A or even more. I think
the 6ga wire is a bit thin for this I think I'd go with the 2ga wire from
the battery to the starter. Two reasons... 1. 2 ga wire will be able to
carry the current with ability to spare (around 150A intermittent). And 2.
The extra weight of 30" of wire is hardly significant to the plane as a
whole.
One thing bothers me though... You said your wiring goes about 6" to the
main contactor then another 6" to the starter contactor. Thatg leads me to
believe that you are drawing all the current for the starter motor through
your main contactor. That is a lot of current for a continuous contactor to
handle. I would wire the starter solenoid directly from the battery
parallel with the buss wire and your main contactor. Then feed the
energizing coil on your starter solenoid with power fed from the main
contactor. That way there will be less heavy wire energized in flight and
the starter cannot be engaged when the master switch is off.
This has come up before and I have a simplified diagram here I can send
direct if you want it.
Noel
--
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
_________________ Noel Loveys
Kitfox III-A
Aerocet 1100 Floats |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rparigoris
Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 792
|
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 11:38 am Post subject: Re: AMPS? |
|
|
Hi Dan B.
The old style starter draws .6kW.
According to Lockwood, the new style starter draws less amps.
For a quick estimate using 60 amps for old style and 50 amps for new style will get you very close to what is probably real draw. Remember this engine is not too much over 70 cubic inches, not 200, 320, 360 or larger.
This info I gathered was based on a 914, but would imagine the 912S would be very similar.
You can choose a larger resolution and look at starter on the right side:
http://www.europaowners.org/forums/gallery2.php?g2_itemId=80372&g2_imageViewsIndex=1
Note if you run starter for 10 seconds, you should wait 2 minutes for cool down.
I have a Odyssey PC525 mounted aft in fuse and am using #4 CCA. Others using #4 have good success, but #2 wire would be a little better.
I think in your instance if #6 worked before, it will work better with the HD starter.
The wire I am using is copper clad aluminium. The diameter is larger than #4 copper but the resistance is just about the same. I almost took the yellow covering off the wire and stripped out strands to make it #5 to save a little weight, then heat shrink Teflon heat shrink over the strands. Sounded good, would have saved a little weight, then I realized just how much weight it was going to save from my rear pocket and idea was put in the bin.
Ron Parigoris
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
flyadive(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:01 pm Post subject: AMPS? |
|
|
Ron & Dan:
Here is the math for the information you gave:
0.6KW = 600 WATTS
600 WATTS (at) 12 VDC (I use 12 V because you are pulling the power from the Battery)
I (current) = 600 W / 12 VDC = 50 AMPS But at WHAT TEMP?
Lets also use 8 VDC... Why? Because many starters will turn over at a much lower voltage than 12 VDC to insure starting when the battery is low and the temp too. SOoooo...
I = 600 WATTS / 8 VDC = 75 AMPS But again at WHAT TEMP?
I have VERY STRONG reservations to where and how they came up with this 0.6KW.
It sounds way - way too low.
I'm betting that current (0.6KW) is a sustained current AFTER the initial surge.
I doubt if they used a current probe connected to a digital O-Scope to capture the true current draw. Having done amperage checks on small lawnmowers, they were pulling 100 Amps on a SUMMER DAY.
Don't go borderline.
Barry
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:38 PM, rparigoris <rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us (rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us)> wrote:
Quote: | --> RotaxEngines-List message posted by: "rparigoris" <rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us (rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us)>
Hi Dan B.
The old style starter draws .6kW.
According to Lockwood, the new style starter draws less amps.
For a quick estimate using 60 amps for old style and 50 amps for new style will get you very close to what is probably real draw. Remember this engine is not too much over 70 cubic inches, not 200, 320, 360 or larger.
This info I gathered was based on a 914, but would imagine the 912S would be very similar.
You can choose a larger resolution and look at starter on the right side:
http://www.europaowners.org/forums/gallery2.php?g2_itemId=80372&g2_imageViewsIndex=1
Note if you run starter for 10 seconds, you should wait 2 minutes for cool down.
I have a Odyssey PC525 mounted aft in fuse and am using #4 CCA. Others using #4 have good success, but #2 wire would be a little better.
I think in your instance if #6 worked before, it will work better with the HD starter.
The wire I am using is copper clad aluminium. The diameter is larger than #4 copper but the resistance is just about the same. I almost took the yellow covering off the wire and stripped out strands to make it #5 to save a little weight, then heat shrink Teflon heat shrink over the strands. Sounded good, would have saved a little weight, then I realized just how much weight it was going to save from my rear pocket and idea was put in the bin.
Ron Parigoris
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=314349#314349
===========
-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List
===========
http://forums.matronics.com
===========
le, List Admin.
="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===========
|
--
Barry
"Chop'd Liver"
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rparigoris
Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 792
|
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:28 pm Post subject: Re: AMPS? |
|
|
Hi Barry
I took the 600 watt number somewhere out of Rotax manual.
Being an electric model aeroplane flier, published numbers frequent lie. Almost always they are low because of voltage drops.
It's true that to achieve the same watt output with a lower voltage you need to up the amperage, in reality when you lower the voltage going to an electric motor the amp draw drops.
I also don't know for certain if toe 600 watt number is actual amp draw or the output of motor. If it is the output of the motor then you have to add in some amp draw because the motor is not 100% efficient.
I forget who, but someone at Lockwood gave me their opinion that the 60 amp and 50 amp actual draw was probably close.
Anybody have a clamp on amp meter and can measure a 91X cranking amp draw?
Bottom line is you need enough RPM to allow easy starting when it's cold out. Who cares if the wire gets a little warm. If you can't get enough RPM, then see if you can figure out how to get it up.
AGM batteries have slightly higher voltage than flooded lead acid, but more important often have a higher cranking voltage. I went for light and the PC545 aft mounted with #4 wires has worked well with folks with the old style starters. A PC680 with #2 wire and forward mounted will spin the engine a little quicker, but who cares if both start easily in the cold. I for one like the net lighter setup with the aft mounted battery because it is lighter and gives me a CG closer to aft than being nose heavy.
Ron Parigoris
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Float Flyr
Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 2704 Location: Campbellton, Newfoundland
|
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 3:45 pm Post subject: AMPS? |
|
|
Barry:
If I read you right you like myself feel the 6Ga. feed wire is a bit on the light side. I agree if someone was to try to push 100 A through that wire it wouldn’t be long before it would heat up and cause even greater resistance.
What would you think an acceptable gauge for the starter feed wire to be? 2Ga. ground straps were mentioned.
I’m almost ready to install the battery in my 912 mod. I think I’ll have to put the battery behind the seats and that means around an 8’ run. I’m seriously considering 0Ga or 00Ga. wire. If I weren’t on floats I’d install a ground power connector.
Noel
From: owner-rotaxengines-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rotaxengines-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of FLYaDIVE
Sent: October 1, 2010 7:28 PM
To: rotaxengines-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Re: AMPS?
Ron & Dan:
Here is the math for the information you gave:
0.6KW = 600 WATTS
600 WATTS (at) 12 VDC (I use 12 V because you are pulling the power from the Battery)
I (current) = 600 W / 12 VDC = 50 AMPS But at WHAT TEMP?
Lets also use 8 VDC... Why? Because many starters will turn over at a much lower voltage than 12 VDC to insure starting when the battery is low and the temp too. SOoooo...
I = 600 WATTS / 8 VDC = 75 AMPS But again at WHAT TEMP?
I have VERY STRONG reservations to where and how they came up with this 0.6KW.
It sounds way - way too low.
I'm betting that current (0.6KW) is a sustained current AFTER the initial surge.
I doubt if they used a current probe connected to a digital O-Scope to capture the true current draw. Having done amperage checks on small lawnmowers, they were pulling 100 Amps on a SUMMER DAY.
Don't go borderline.
Barry
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:38 PM, rparigoris <rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us (rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us)> wrote:
--> RotaxEngines-List message posted by: "rparigoris" <rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us (rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us)>
Hi Dan B.
The old style starter draws .6kW.
According to Lockwood, the new style starter draws less amps.
For a quick estimate using 60 amps for old style and 50 amps for new style will get you very close to what is probably real draw. Remember this engine is not too much over 70 cubic inches, not 200, 320, 360 or larger.
This info I gathered was based on a 914, but would imagine the 912S would be very similar.
You can choose a larger resolution and look at starter on the right side:
http://www.europaowners.org/forums/gallery2.php?g2_itemId=80372&g2_imageViewsIndex=1
Note if you run starter for 10 seconds, you should wait 2 minutes for cool down.
I have a Odyssey PC525 mounted aft in fuse and am using #4 CCA. Others using #4 have good success, but #2 wire would be a little better.
I think in your instance if #6 worked before, it will work better with the HD starter.
The wire I am using is copper clad aluminium. The diameter is larger than #4 copper but the resistance is just about the same. I almost took the yellow covering off the wire and stripped out strands to make it #5 to save a little weight, then heat shrink Teflon heat shrink over the strands. Sounded good, would have saved a little weight, then I realized just how much weight it was going to save from my rear pocket and idea was put in the bin.
Ron Parigoris
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=314349#314349
===========
-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List
===========
http://forums.matronics.com
===========
le, List Admin.
="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===========
--
Barry
"Chop'd Liver"
Quote: | http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List | 0123456789
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
_________________ Noel Loveys
Kitfox III-A
Aerocet 1100 Floats |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roger Lee
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1464 Location: Tucson, Az.
|
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 7:43 pm Post subject: Re: AMPS? |
|
|
up to 70 amps. If you pull more look for a problem. Use 4ga. wire even a 2ga. for a long run. The shorter the battery to starter wire the better. Make sure the ground wire is a larger size too.
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
_________________ Roger Lee
Tucson, Az.
Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
Light Sport Repairman
Home 520-574-1080 TRY HOME FIRST
Cell 520-349-7056 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 12:50 am Post subject: AMPS? |
|
|
Hi! all.
.......and for my contribution ...use multicore welding wire! On short runs
the weight factor is negligible. Been there got the "T" shirt.
Regards
Bob Harrison Europa G-PTAG 914 Rotax c/w Up graded Starter and never a
problem even with 9 year old Oddessey Batteries.
--
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
grahamsingleton(at)btinte Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 12:50 am Post subject: AMPS? |
|
|
I agree. The impedance of the motor is very low until it starts to turn at a reasonable speed. If it stalls, which it might on a cold day, it will take a lot more current, start to heat up connections and resistance will increase, reducing current still further.
I went for Perihelions Fatwire, copper coated aluminum. Worth reading what he says about it. I used #2 for my Lycoming, #4 should be fine for a Rotax. <http://www.periheliondesign.com/fatwires.htm>
Graham
From: FLYaDIVE <flyadive(at)gmail.com>
To: rotaxengines-list(at)matronics.com
Sent: Friday, 1 October, 2010 22:57:52
Subject: Re: Re: AMPS?
Ron & Dan:
I have VERY STRONG reservations to where and how they came up with this 0.6KW.
It sounds way - way too low.
Barry
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:38 PM, rparigoris <rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us (rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us)> wrote:
Quote: | --> RotaxEngines-List message posted by: "rparigoris" <rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us (rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us)>
Hi Dan B.
The old style starter draws .6kW.
According to Lockwood, the new style starter draws less amps.
For a quick estimate using 60 amps for old style and 50 amps for new style will get you very close to what is probably real draw. Remember this engine is not too much over 70 cubic inches, not 200, 320, 360 or larger.
This info I gathered was based on a 914, but would imagine the 912S would be very similar.
You can choose a larger resolution and look at starter on the right side:
http://www.europaowners.org/forums/gallery2.php?g2_itemId=80372&g2_imageViewsIndex=1
Note if you run starter for 10 seconds, you should wait 2 minutes for cool down.
I have a Odyssey PC525 mounted aft in fuse and am using #4 CCA. Others using #4 have good success, but #2 wire would be a little better.
I think in your instance if #6 worked before, it will work better with the HD starter.
The wire I am using is copper clad aluminium. The diameter is larger than #4 copper but the resistance is just about the same. I almost took the yellow covering off the wire and stripped out strands to make it #5 to save a little weight, then heat shrink Teflon heat shrink over the strands. Sounded good, would have saved a little weight, then I realized just how much weight it was going to save from my rear pocket and idea was put in the bin.
Ron Parigoris
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=314349#314349
===========
-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List
===========
http://forums.matronics.com
===========
le, List Admin.
="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===========
|
--
Barry
"Chop'd Liver"
[quote]http://www.matronics.com/Navi========================
" target="_blank" href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matr --> [b]
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
grahamsingleton(at)btinte Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:59 am Post subject: AMPS? |
|
|
Bob
True!
Graham
From: Robert C Harrison <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk>
To: rotaxengines-list(at)matronics.com
Sent: Saturday, 2 October, 2010 9:47:33
Subject: RE: Re: AMPS?
--> RotaxEngines-List message posted by: "Robert C Harrison" <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk (ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk)>
Hi! all.
........and for my contribution ...use multicore welding wire! On short runs
the weight factor is negligible. Been there got the "T" shirt.
Regards
Bob Harrison Europa G-PTAG 914 Rotax c/w Up graded Starter and never a
problem even with 9 year old Oddessey Batteries.
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan(at)azshowersolutions. Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 4:52 am Post subject: AMPS? |
|
|
Gentlemen, I thank you for your replies and attention to this. I put the queston out here as I was getting many varried answers from other builders as well as Rotax dealers. Lockwood even told me I would be ok with using #6, however, after these informative posts I'm going with a safety margin and ordering #2 cable.
Thanks again,
Dan B
Mesa, AZ
From: GRAHAM SINGLETON <grahamsingleton(at)btinternet.com>
To: rotaxengines-list(at)matronics.com
Sent: Sat, October 2, 2010 2:56:19 AM
Subject: Re: Re: AMPS?
Bob
True!
Graham
From: Robert C Harrison <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk>
To: rotaxengines-list(at)matronics.com
Sent: Saturday, 2 October, 2010 9:47:33
Subject: RE: Re: AMPS?
--> RotaxEngines-List message posted by: "Robert C Harrison" <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk (ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk)>
Hi! all.
.......and for my contribution ...use multicore welding wire! On short runs
the weight factor is negligible. Been there got the "T" shirt.
Regards
Bob Harrison Europa G-PTAG 914 Rotax c/w Up graded Starter and never a
problem even with 9 year old Oddessey Batteries.
[quote][b][b]
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
grahamsingleton(at)btinte Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 9:54 am Post subject: AMPS? |
|
|
Dan
you'll be OK with #4
Graham
From: Dan Billingsley <dan(at)azshowersolutions.com>
To: rotaxengines-list(at)matronics.com
Sent: Saturday, 2 October, 2010 13:49:20
Subject: Re: Re: AMPS?
Gentlemen, I thank you for your replies and attention to this. I put the queston out here as I was getting many varried answers from other builders as well as Rotax dealers. Lockwood even told me I would be ok with using #6, however, after these informative posts I'm going with a safety margin and ordering #2 cable.
Thanks again,
Dan B
Mesa, AZ
From: GRAHAM SINGLETON <grahamsingleton(at)btinternet.com>
To: rotaxengines-list(at)matronics.com
Sent: Sat, October 2, 2010 2:56:19 AM
Subject: Re: Re: AMPS?
Bob
True!
Graham
From: Robert C Harrison <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk>
To: rotaxengines-list(at)matronics.com
Sent: Saturday, 2 October, 2010 9:47:33
Subject: RE: Re: AMPS?
--> RotaxEngines-List message posted by: "Robert C Harrison" <ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk (ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk)>
Hi! all.
........and for my contribution ...use multicore welding wire! On short runs
the weight factor is negligible. Been there got the "T" shirt.
Regards
Bob Harrison Europa G-PTAG 914 Rotax c/w Up graded Starter and never a
problem even with 9 year old Oddessey Batteries.
Quote: | http://www.matronics.cfollow" target="_blank" href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forum==========
|
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
flyadive(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 8:44 am Post subject: AMPS? |
|
|
You are going to have to explain your statement on this on:
" in reality when you lower the voltage going to an electric motor the amp draw drops."
When you lower the voltage AND the motor still runs the AMPERAGE MUST GO UP.
I = E/R
The FIXED is the Resistance. The only variance in the Resistance is due to Heat and Brush Ware.
At some point in dropping the voltage the motor will not function - That is because the voltage is too low to produce an inductive field in the stator and rotor..
BUT! As long as the voltage is enough to make the motor move the Current ( I ) will go UP.
There is NO OTHER - REALITY - Statement.
I know, I know I'm a PITA and a stickler to detail.
Quote: |
"I also don't know for certain if toe 600 watt number is actual amp draw or the output of motor. If it is the output of the motor then you have to add in some amp draw because the motor is not 100% efficient."
|
There are two (2) things not known:
1 - When and How the readings were taken to determine the 0.6KW... As I stated in my previous post. I betting they were taken AFTER the starter motor reached full speed.
2 - You statement of "100% efficient" does not have ANYTHING to do with this. Efficiency is equal to OUTPUT divided my INPUT. % - IN / OUT. And we don't care what the OUT is. We are only interested in what the IN is... HOW MUCH INPUT CURRENT will the Starter Motor draw during startup.
AND - It is the instantaneous Current with the high mechanical load that the Wires must handle.
AHhhh clamp on meters... That is what I'm betting the the manufacture used to get the current draw.
They show ONLY an RMS value and not the peak. Guess-factoring you can add 29.3% <<<--- a real number, more to that reading to be more in-line with what the wire should be handling. And "should be handling'", my quote, does not give a safety margin. A step up of at least one wire size would be minimum.
Again I must state: I know, I know I'm a PITA and a stickler to detail.
Barry
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
grahamsingleton(at)btinte Guest
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:07 am Post subject: AMPS? |
|
|
No. The faster the motor runs the greater the back EMF. So the lower the current.
Graham
From: FLYaDIVE <flyadive(at)gmail.com>
To: rotaxengines-list(at)matronics.com
Sent: Sunday, 3 October, 2010 17:42:01
Subject: Re: RotaxEngines-List: Re: AMPS?
You are going to have to explain your statement on this on:
" in reality when you lower the voltage going to an electric motor the amp draw drops."
When you lower the voltage AND the motor still runs the AMPERAGE MUST GO UP.
I = E/R
The FIXED is the Resistance. The only variance in the Resistance is due to Heat and Brush Ware.
At some point in dropping the voltage the motor will not function - That is because the voltage is too low to produce an inductive field in the stator and rotor..
BUT! As long as the voltage is enough to make the motor move the Current ( I ) will go UP.
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
flyadive(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:29 am Post subject: AMPS? |
|
|
Hello Noel:
I really like your idea of a Ground Power Connector, they offer all sorts of advantages.
How does being on floats negate the Ground Power Connector?
As you know and mentioned, wire run length is a major factor. An AWG of 2 should do well for short runs of wire and that #2 does have a safety margin figured in. Going to an AWG of 0 for BOTH POSITIVE & NEGATIVE runs should work VERY well.
I have never use it - But, there have been many reports of using 'welder's cable', very flexible, abrasion resistance, low resistance and available at welding supply houses. They also have the ring lugs.
AND - Gaggle - I know I posted this before but it REALLY is a GREAT TRICK:
SOLDER the wire to the ring lug ONLY at the end next to the mounting part of the ring lug.
Crimp First - Then older. Clean well.
Barry
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Noel Loveys <noelloveys(at)yahoo.ca (noelloveys(at)yahoo.ca)> wrote:
Quote: |
Barry:
If I read you right you like myself feel the 6Ga. feed wire is a bit on the light side. I agree if someone was to try to push 100 A through that wire it wouldn’t be long before it would heat up and cause even greater resistance.
What would you think an acceptable gauge for the starter feed wire to be? 2Ga. ground straps were mentioned.
I’m almost ready to install the battery in my 912 mod. I think I’ll have to put the battery behind the seats and that means around an 8’ run. I’m seriously considering 0Ga or 00Ga. wire. If I weren’t on floats I’d install a ground power connector.
Noel
From: owner-rotaxengines-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-rotaxengines-list-server(at)matronics.com) [mailto:owner-rotaxengines-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-rotaxengines-list-server(at)matronics.com)] On Behalf Of FLYaDIVE
Sent: October 1, 2010 7:28 PM
To: rotaxengines-list(at)matronics.com (rotaxengines-list(at)matronics.com)
Subject: Re: Re: AMPS?
Ron & Dan:
Here is the math for the information you gave:
0.6KW = 600 WATTS
600 WATTS (at) 12 VDC (I use 12 V because you are pulling the power from the Battery)
I (current) = 600 W / 12 VDC = 50 AMPS But at WHAT TEMP?
Lets also use 8 VDC... Why? Because many starters will turn over at a much lower voltage than 12 VDC to insure starting when the battery is low and the temp too. SOoooo...
I = 600 WATTS / 8 VDC = 75 AMPS But again at WHAT TEMP?
I have VERY STRONG reservations to where and how they came up with this 0.6KW.
It sounds way - way too low.
I'm betting that current (0.6KW) is a sustained current AFTER the initial surge.
I doubt if they used a current probe connected to a digital O-Scope to capture the true current draw. Having done amperage checks on small lawnmowers, they were pulling 100 Amps on a SUMMER DAY.
Don't go borderline.
Barry
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:38 PM, rparigoris <rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us (rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us)> wrote:
--> RotaxEngines-List message posted by: "rparigoris" <rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us (rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us)>
Hi Dan B.
The old style starter draws .6kW.
According to Lockwood, the new style starter draws less amps.
For a quick estimate using 60 amps for old style and 50 amps for new style will get you very close to what is probably real draw. Remember this engine is not too much over 70 cubic inches, not 200, 320, 360 or larger.
This info I gathered was based on a 914, but would imagine the 912S would be very similar.
You can choose a larger resolution and look at starter on the right side:
http://www.europaowners.org/forums/gallery2.php?g2_itemId=80372&g2_imageViewsIndex=1
Note if you run starter for 10 seconds, you should wait 2 minutes for cool down.
I have a Odyssey PC525 mounted aft in fuse and am using #4 CCA. Others using #4 have good success, but #2 wire would be a little better.
I think in your instance if #6 worked before, it will work better with the HD starter.
The wire I am using is copper clad aluminium. The diameter is larger than #4 copper but the resistance is just about the same. I almost took the yellow covering off the wire and stripped out strands to make it #5 to save a little weight, then heat shrink Teflon heat shrink over the strands. Sounded good, would have saved a little weight, then I realized just how much weight it was going to save from my rear pocket and idea was put in the bin.
Ron Parigoris
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=314349#314349
===========
-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List
===========
http://forums.matronics.com
===========
le, List Admin.
="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===========
--
Barry
"Chop'd Liver"
01
2 34567 89
0
|
--
Barry
"Chop'd Liver"
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
flyadive(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:49 am Post subject: AMPS? |
|
|
Gaggle:
I put in the wrong formula.
I = P / E
Sorry - Did anyone else catch it?
Barry
Quote: |
You are going to have to explain your statement on this on:
" in reality when you lower the voltage going to an electric motor the amp draw drops."
When you lower the voltage AND the motor still runs the AMPERAGE MUST GO UP.
I = E/R
The FIXED is the Resistance. The only variance in the Resistance is due to Heat and Brush Ware.
At some point in dropping the voltage the motor will not function - That is because the voltage is too low to produce an inductive field in the stator and rotor..
BUT! As long as the voltage is enough to make the motor move the Current ( I ) will go UP.
Quote: |
ist" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
|
|
--
Barry
"Chop'd Liver"
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rparigoris
Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 792
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:00 pm Post subject: Re: AMPS? |
|
|
Hi Barry
"It's true that to achieve the same watt output with a lower voltage you need to up the amperage, in reality when you lower the voltage going to an electric motor the amp draw drops."
If you have a battery or power supply with wires that can keep the lowering of voltage and amperage to a minimum, then it's true that if you lower the voltage to a motor that is reasonably loaded the amp draw will go up since the motor can't spin as fast as if it had higher voltage (within reason as far as voltage and load and motor timing).
What I was getting at is that often (VERY OFTEN with high performance moder electrics) you may have a battery and wire size that is very close to asking max. amps that the battery can offer while maintaining a reasonable voltage.
If you ask any more amps it will begin to give up a lot of voltage and not offer up any more amps. If you have long thin wires that only drop voltage further, then heat the wires up and drop voltage even further, often you are asking more amps from the battery that it can put out. The scenario is the battery is huffing and puffing harder and harder but begins dropping amp output and voltage, and the wires are warming up and making things worst. Net is if you see too little voltage at a running loaded motor (again within reason and you calculated what you are looking for), it probably means you have a battery that has not enough ability to dump amps and keep the voltage up, and or the wires are creating too much resistance and dropping voltage. In this scenario of marginal battery and wires, lets put it in the cold where the battery is offering up even less performance and the motor is offering up more resistance to turning and we measure a lower voltage going to the motor, the motor will just plain not be seeing very many amps going to it compared to a warm battery and engine.
Again what really matters to me is when it's cold out I can start my bird.
BTW on cars it works where on a cold day if you turn on all loads for a few minutes before starting the the warming up of the battery compared to the watts used nets to more cranking power.
Also with electric motors timing is every bit as important as on IC motors. You want to select proper advance for what you are doing. You never want to run a brushed motor retarded from neutral. Amp draw will go way up and brush life and power output way down. Select too much advance for a highly loaded motor and if you can provide enough amps you will get a little more power output, but often the battery/wires net to less power and you are better off running closer to a neutral timing. I wouldn't be too surprised if someone tried a few motors and optimized timing for our 91Xs to get the high output version that draws less amps than the original. I wouldn't be too surprised if the original motor wouldn't benefit a lot by optimized timing, but then again it may not be too easy to adjust.
Ron Parigoris
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Float Flyr
Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 2704 Location: Campbellton, Newfoundland
|
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 4:36 pm Post subject: AMPS? |
|
|
Barry:
There are a few reasons why I wouldn’t use a ground power connector. First is there are no brakes on a float plane. It would work great if I had someone else to remove the connector after starting the engine. Tying the tail is with a slip knot is an option but then I would still have to have the engine running with no one in the cockpit... not the best idea. Finally is of course the possibility of damaging the ground battery pack if the connector happened to fall in the drink.
Wheel planes are another quintal of fish! There are chocks to hold them in place and usually a few people to remove the connector and of course it gives you plenty of power for those cold morning starts without having to worry about carrying the batteries aloft.
Noel
From: owner-rotaxengines-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rotaxengines-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of FLYaDIVE
Sent: October 3, 2010 2:56 PM
To: rotaxengines-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Re: AMPS?
Hello Noel:
I really like your idea of a Ground Power Connector, they offer all sorts of advantages.
How does being on floats negate the Ground Power Connector?
As you know and mentioned, wire run length is a major factor. An AWG of 2 should do well for short runs of wire and that #2 does have a safety margin figured in. Going to an AWG of 0 for BOTH POSITIVE & NEGATIVE runs should work VERY well.
I have never use it - But, there have been many reports of using 'welder's cable', very flexible, abrasion resistance, low resistance and available at welding supply houses. They also have the ring lugs.
AND - Gaggle - I know I posted this before but it REALLY is a GREAT TRICK:
SOLDER the wire to the ring lug ONLY at the end next to the mounting part of the ring lug.
Crimp First - Then older. Clean well.
Barry
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Noel Loveys <noelloveys(at)yahoo.ca (noelloveys(at)yahoo.ca)> wrote:
Barry:
If I read you right you like myself feel the 6Ga. feed wire is a bit on the light side. I agree if someone was to try to push 100 A through that wire it wouldn’t be long before it would heat up and cause even greater resistance.
What would you think an acceptable gauge for the starter feed wire to be? 2Ga. ground straps were mentioned.
I’m almost ready to install the battery in my 912 mod. I think I’ll have to put the battery behind the seats and that means around an 8’ run. I’m seriously considering 0Ga or 00Ga. wire. If I weren’t on floats I’d install a ground power connector.
Noel
From: owner-rotaxengines-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-rotaxengines-list-server(at)matronics.com) [mailto:owner-rotaxengines-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-rotaxengines-list-server(at)matronics.com)] On Behalf Of FLYaDIVE
Sent: October 1, 2010 7:28 PM
To: rotaxengines-list(at)matronics.com (rotaxengines-list(at)matronics.com)
Subject: Re: Re: AMPS?
Ron & Dan:
Here is the math for the information you gave:
0.6KW = 600 WATTS
600 WATTS (at) 12 VDC (I use 12 V because you are pulling the power from the Battery)
I (current) = 600 W / 12 VDC = 50 AMPS But at WHAT TEMP?
Lets also use 8 VDC... Why? Because many starters will turn over at a much lower voltage than 12 VDC to insure starting when the battery is low and the temp too. SOoooo...
I = 600 WATTS / 8 VDC = 75 AMPS But again at WHAT TEMP?
I have VERY STRONG reservations to where and how they came up with this 0.6KW.
It sounds way - way too low.
I'm betting that current (0.6KW) is a sustained current AFTER the initial surge.
I doubt if they used a current probe connected to a digital O-Scope to capture the true current draw. Having done amperage checks on small lawnmowers, they were pulling 100 Amps on a SUMMER DAY.
Don't go borderline.
Barry
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:38 PM, rparigoris <rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us (rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us)> wrote:
--> RotaxEngines-List message posted by: "rparigoris" <rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us (rparigor(at)suffolk.lib.ny.us)>
Hi Dan B.
The old style starter draws .6kW.
According to Lockwood, the new style starter draws less amps.
For a quick estimate using 60 amps for old style and 50 amps for new style will get you very close to what is probably real draw. Remember this engine is not too much over 70 cubic inches, not 200, 320, 360 or larger.
This info I gathered was based on a 914, but would imagine the 912S would be very similar.
You can choose a larger resolution and look at starter on the right side:
http://www.europaowners.org/forums/gallery2.php?g2_itemId=80372&g2_imageViewsIndex=1
Note if you run starter for 10 seconds, you should wait 2 minutes for cool down.
I have a Odyssey PC525 mounted aft in fuse and am using #4 CCA. Others using #4 have good success, but #2 wire would be a little better.
I think in your instance if #6 worked before, it will work better with the HD starter.
The wire I am using is copper clad aluminium. The diameter is larger than #4 copper but the resistance is just about the same. I almost took the yellow covering off the wire and stripped out strands to make it #5 to save a little weight, then heat shrink Teflon heat shrink over the strands. Sounded good, would have saved a little weight, then I realized just how much weight it was going to save from my rear pocket and idea was put in the bin.
Ron Parigoris
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=314349#314349
===========
-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List
===========
http://forums.matronics.com
===========
le, List Admin.
="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===========
--
Barry
"Chop'd Liver"
Quote: | ist" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-Listtp://forums.matronics.com | 01
--
Barry
"Chop'd Liver"
23456789 Quote: | http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List | 0 Quote: | http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List | 1 Quote: | http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List | 2 Quote: | http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List | 3 Quote: | http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List | 4 Quote: | http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List | 5 Quote: | http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List | 6 Quote: | http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List | 7 Quote: | http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List | 8 Quote: | http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List | 901
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics RotaxEngines-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RotaxEngines-List |
|
_________________ Noel Loveys
Kitfox III-A
Aerocet 1100 Floats |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|