|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 7:43 pm Post subject: Thermocouples |
|
|
At 02:40 PM 11/16/2010, you wrote:
Quote: |
Hi Bob,
My recollection of the voltage curves for J and K types would
render the fabric range down at the low voltage end for a K type.
If these are the cheap meters, you'll get better resolution with a J
because of higher voltage per degree and larger voltage at 300F.
OK, so less desirable if not useless.
|
Okay . . . Yes, the voltage vs. temperature gradient
for J is larger than K and therefore easier to measure
with greater resolution. But modern digitizing and
processing makes this less of an issue. The display
resolution on the Fluke 51/52 t/c meter is 0.1 C or F
but the stated accuracy of instrument is +/- 1.1C
with K-wire then there's accuracy of the wire itself
which can stack another 1.5 to 2.5 degrees C error
with either J or K assuming the wire meets industry
performance minimums.
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/776AB03E065228408625727B00034E20
Multi-meters with t/c inputs tend not to be as
capable as a dedicated t/c device like the Fluke
51/52 devices. I think the last time I compared one
of my multi-meters with the Fluke, there was a
difference of 4 degrees at 100C.
The thrust of this missive goes to the notion
that thermocouples and their display devices are
subject to well understood errors. Further, one
needs to be mindful of additional errors that can
crop up in poorly crafted joints.
So don't be too surprised if side-by-side t/c
instruments reading the same point differ by
5-10 degrees at CHT temperatures.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rampil
Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 870
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:11 am Post subject: Re: Thermocouples |
|
|
Hi Bob,
Thanks for the input!
When I responded, I was not considering Fluke, HP, or Tektronix,
but rather cheapy $10 DMMs with cheap ADCs with poor temporal and voltage resolution and precision.
My concerns would be negligible on a $500 Fluke!
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Ira N224XS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 8:49 am Post subject: Thermocouples |
|
|
At 09:11 AM 11/17/2010, you wrote:
Quote: |
Hi Bob,
Thanks for the input!
When I responded, I was not considering Fluke, HP, or Tektronix,
but rather cheapy $10 DMMs with cheap ADCs with poor temporal and
voltage resolution and precision.
My concerns would be negligible on a $500 Fluke!
|
Understand.
For folks interested in elevating their temperature
measurement capabilities, an Ebay seller has about
a half dozen Fluke 51 meters for $66.00 BuyItNow (includes
shipping), item 170556237065.
See also items 140478886447, 220696564187, 270664205816
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|