|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:31 am Post subject: Z-13/8 Rev. R |
|
|
Quote: | Thanks for the reminder! I think I'll take those
out.
Bob . . .
|
I've done some house-keeping on Z-13/8 and published
a preliminary drawing at:
http://www.aeroelectric.com/PPS/Adobe_Architecture_Pdfs/Z13-8R%28Prelimary%29.pdf
Interested parties are invited to make suggestions
or make we aware of stubbed toes . . .
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
s.blanton(at)sbcglobal.ne Guest
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:40 pm Post subject: Z-13/8 Rev. R |
|
|
Bob,
In Rev. R of Z-13/8 I note a couple of changes that I hope you can clarify for me.
The diodes are gone on the S704-1 relay for the dynamo. Is this intentional?
Is the deletion of the resistor across the capacitor also intentional?
Why the change from a fusible link to a fuse rating approx. 3x for the circuit protection for the dynamo?
Thanks for furthering my electrical education.
Stan Blanton
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:59 pm Post subject: Z-13/8 Rev. R |
|
|
At 02:33 PM 11/17/2010, you wrote:
Quote: | Bob,
In Rev. R of Z-13/8 I note a couple of changes that I hope you can
clarify for me.
The diodes are gone on the S704-1 relay for the dynamo. Is this intentional?
|
Yes, those were part of the "dead battery" scenario. The pair
of diodes allowed the self-excited SD-8 to close its own
connect relay even if the battery was dead . . . a situation
that is exceedingly low probability for a well designed/operated/
maintained OBAM aircraft.
Quote: | Is the deletion of the resistor across the capacitor also intentional?
|
Yes
Quote: | Why the change from a fusible link to a fuse rating approx. 3x for
the circuit protection for the dynamo?
|
Fusible links are okay . . . but I was thinking
of 'tightening up' wiring between the battery (always
hot) and the SD-8 disconnect relay. This pathway needs
to be as short as practical. A fusible link in this location
COULD have been simply a short piece of 20AWG, but
it seemed a bit cleaner (faster and less smoke) to have
a real fuse in there . . . the commercial off the shelf
fuse holder comes with lead wires . . . hence the
replacement. 30A rating is less likely to pop due to
inrush charging the capacitor.
Quote: |
Thanks for furthering my electrical education.
|
Thanks for asking. I should point out that this is
NOT a recommendation that anyone run out to the hangar
and replace RevQ with RevR . . . this is just another
step along the trail that evolved this architecture.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
fvalarm(at)rapidnet.net Guest
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:06 pm Post subject: Z-13/8 Rev. R |
|
|
Bob,
Thanks for your work on this. Couple minor points and some questions.
1) Your drawing is for one Emag and one Pmag as shown in the lower right
powered from different busses, but the battery bus on the left shows L and R
ignitions powered from there.
2) Again, at the battery bus, the 15amp fuse feeds a short 14AWG wire to the
relay. The relay control wire to the switch is 22AWG, and again from same
switch to ground. Shouldn't these wires also be 14AWG? I noticed on the
previous version of the drawing last night, and it shows up in the aux
alternator circuit too.
3) Shouldn't the fuselink feeding the E-bus be located at the feed end (next
to the relay)?.
4) For some reason, I think the relay, load shunt, capacitor, crow bar
components etc for the aux alt circuit should be located on the cockpit side
of the firewall (possibly for a cleaner more cooler environment). Is this
true? Further, the drawing shows the capacitor grounded at the firewall
ground bus. Is there any problem grounding it at the avionics buss instead
which is closer in my current layout?
5) You've got 5X20 AWG wires between the firewall ground and avionics
ground busses. Is this intended to be on the same PIDG connector as shown
or 5 separate connectors? If it's on the same connector, why not just use a
heavier equivalent wire? Say 12AWG.
6) Where can I buy a low voltage module? The one shown doesn't seem to be
on the B and C website.
Thanks,
Bevan
RV7A wiring
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:06 am Post subject: Z-13/8 Rev. R |
|
|
Bob,
Thanks for your work on this. Couple minor points and some questions.
1) Your drawing is for one Emag and one Pmag as shown in the lower right
powered from different busses, but the battery bus on the left shows L and R
ignitions powered from there.
That's an artifact from an earlier cut-n-paste. Good catch.
Fixed.
2) Again, at the battery bus, the 15amp fuse feeds a short 14AWG wire to the
relay. The relay control wire to the switch is 22AWG, and again from same
switch to ground. Shouldn't these wires also be 14AWG?
No, these wires carry relay control current only which is
perhaps 150 mA. This is not unlike the wire that controls
the battery contactor too.
3) Shouldn't the fuselink feeding the E-bus be located at the feed end (next
to the relay)?.
No, that feedpath can be powered from BOTH ends hence protection
at both ends. But you reminded me of another feature I wanted
to fix. A faulted fuse at the e-bus end is much faster and less likely
to damage the e-bus normal feedpath diode. I've revised to suggest
fuse protection at that end as opposed to fusible link.
4) For some reason, I think the relay, load shunt, capacitor, crow bar
components etc for the aux alt circuit should be located on the cockpit side
of the firewall (possibly for a cleaner more cooler environment). Is this
true?
Not a big deal. Obviously it's cooler and cleaner in the
cabin but at the same time, keeping all the high power
wires out on the firewall is probably preferred.
Further, the drawing shows the capacitor grounded at the firewall
ground bus. Is there any problem grounding it at the avionics buss instead
which is closer in my current layout?
NO! That wire carries a lot of ripple current which
is the byproduct of smoothing the SD-8 output . . . you
don't want to inject that into the avionics ground. I
think I'd keep all that alternator stuff on the forward
side of the firewall.
5) You've got 5X20 AWG wires between the firewall ground and avionics
ground busses. Is this intended to be on the same PIDG connector as shown
or 5 separate connectors?
5 separate connectors at the firewall and 5 separate
pins in the panel ground d-sub.
If it's on the same connector, why not just use a
heavier equivalent wire? Say 12AWG.
Use a 12AWG if you want to solder the wire to your
panel ground connector like shown here
http://aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Grounding/Minibus1.jpg
6) Where can I buy a low voltage module? The one shown doesn't seem to be
on the B and C website.
That's one of my devices which will be the next
product out the gate here. If you need it right
now, Eric Jones has one.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Erich_Weaver(at)urscorp.c Guest
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:58 am Post subject: Z-13/8 Rev. R |
|
|
Minor comments to consider:
My local experience is that most everyone building these days, even those on a budget, are installing engine monitors. Stand-alone low voltage monitors are not required. Similarly, alternator load meters and their associated shunts have been replaced by Hall effect sensors and the engine monitor. Maybe its time to modernize the schematic to reflect this? Just a thought...
Erich [quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulR
Joined: 13 Nov 2008 Posts: 22 Location: Alabama
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 12:26 pm Post subject: Re: Z-13/8 Rev. R |
|
|
Bob,
I was under the impression that EMAG Air had discontinued the "E" mag and was only making/selling the "P" mag. Just thinking that if you're revising it, maybe worthwhile to look into that also.
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Paul Rose
N417PR
RV-9A |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 1:09 pm Post subject: Z-13/8 Rev. R |
|
|
At 02:26 PM 11/18/2010, you wrote:
Quote: |
Bob,
I was under the impression that EMAG Air had discontinued the "E"
mag and was only making/selling the "P" mag. Just thinking that if
you're revising it, maybe worthwhile to look into that also.
|
Interesting. Thanks for the heads-up. I note that the
e-models are not priced on the website. I've not talked
with those guys for awhile, I need to give them a call
and catch up.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 1:16 pm Post subject: Z-13/8 Rev. R |
|
|
At 11:46 AM 11/18/2010, you wrote:
Quote: | Minor comments to consider:
My local experience is that most everyone building these days, even those on a budget, are installing engine monitors. Stand-alone low voltage monitors are not required. Similarly, alternator load meters and their associated shunts have been replaced by Hall effect sensors and the engine monitor. Maybe its time to modernize the schematic to reflect this? Just a thought... |
The Z-figures are not a "do it this way" document.
They're an example of an ARCHITECTURE which speaks
to failure tolerance for a particular combination
of flight-profile-driven battery and alternator
decisions.
Whether or not a particular airplane is fitted with
the accessories illustrated is not germane to the
intent and purpose of the Z-figure. There's an endless
combination of accessories that may drive sizes of
busses, sizes of battery, size of alternator, sizes
of wires, choices of ignition systems and yes . . .
methodology for monitoring any of the ship's functions.
The most important thing to consider for LV monitoring
is timely, unambiguous and attention getting notification
for "time to switch to plan-b". If the builder has some
alternative means for accomplishing that, great. The
reason for having it in the Z-figure is to simply remind
the planner that SOME form of device needs to be a
part of the final recipe for success.
Bob . . . [quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|