Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Headphone impedance

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
peter(at)sportingaero.com
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:36 pm    Post subject: Headphone impedance Reply with quote

Hi,

I have a question concerning headset impedance, and what will work. I am
trying to build a helmet for use in an aerobatic airplane, the principal
requirement is to be as thin as possible on top of my head. I have found
a parachuting helmet that seems ideal - and is very comfortable. Now I
want to add comms. I was going to use a Halo headset, but its a problem
sticking the ear plugs in your ears before putting the helmet on. At the
weekend I was at a motorcycle show and was talking with an intercom
maker. He sold me a kit to add comms to a motorcycle helmet, including
an electret boom mic and a pair of thin speakers that fix inside the
helmet. He didn't know the impedance of the speakers, but suspects they
are quite low. I said I needed 600 ohms - his reply was that it wouldn't
be a problem. The audio system is quite simple - Becker AR4201 straight
to the headset. The Becker manual says:
Receiver data ... Rated output: for speaker operation:
at 13.75 V nominal operating voltage >= 3 W at 4 ohms
at 10.0 V operating voltage (emergency mode) >= 1.5 W at 4 ohms
with headset connected:
at 13.75 V nominal operating voltage >= 100 mW at 600 ohms
at 10.0 V operating voltage (emergency mode) >= 30 mW at 600 ohms

So the question is, how are these speakers that I am about to stick into
my helmet going to react when the radio output is fed to them? If their
impedance is low I'm guessing that will impact the volume, so I imagine
I will have to turn the radio volume up? It a noisy airplane and is
already up fairly high. Can I add some resistors to help out? Do I
connect both speakers to the tels output (doesn't that cut the already
low impedance in half?) Are all electret mics the same?

Thanks, Peter


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Float Flyr



Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 2704
Location: Campbellton, Newfoundland

PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 6:46 pm    Post subject: Headphone impedance Reply with quote

Looks to me your receiver requires a 4 ohm impedance. BTW you have to be
careful not to confuse impedance with resistance even though they are
related. Most low impedance headphones are 4 Ohms but check it should be
written on the phones somewhere. A mismatch of impedance can result in poor
clarity and in some instances problems with the audio output transistors of
the radio.

Noel

--


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List

_________________
Noel Loveys
Kitfox III-A
Aerocet 1100 Floats
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
rjquillin(at)cox.net
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:49 pm    Post subject: Headphone impedance Reply with quote

At 13:31 11/30/2010, you wrote:
Quote:
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Peter Pengilly <peter(at)sportingaero.com>

Hi,

I have a question concerning headset impedance, and what will work. I am trying to build a helmet for use in an aerobatic airplane, the principal requirement is to be as thin as possible on top of my head. I have found a parachuting helmet that seems ideal - and is very comfortable. Now I want to add comms. I was going to use a Halo headset, but its a problem sticking the ear plugs in your ears before putting the helmet on. At the weekend I was at a motorcycle show and was talking with an intercom maker. He sold me a kit to add comms to a motorcycle helmet, including an electret boom mic and a pair of thin speakers that fix inside the helmet. He didn't know the impedance of the speakers, but suspects they are quite low. I said I needed 600 ohms - his reply was that it wouldn't be a problem. The audio system is quite simple - Becker AR4201 straight to the headset. The Becker manual says:
Receiver data ... Rated output: for speaker operation:
at 13.75 V nominal operating voltage >= 3 W at 4 ohms
at 10.0 V operating voltage (emergency mode) >= 1.5 W at 4 ohms
with headset connected:
at 13.75 V nominal operating voltage >= 100 mW at 600 ohms
at 10.0 V operating voltage (emergency mode) >= 30 mW at 600 ohms

From your post, it is unclear if you plan on connecting your helmet speakers to the speaker output, or the headphone output. It would be inappropriate to connect them to the HP output, as they would excessively load the receiver if connected to an output designed to feed a 600 ohm load.

Were you to connect them to the speaker output, loading would not be an issue, but you may find level control to be difficult as the speakers would be much closer to your ear than cabin mounted transducer(s). Some series resistance would likely be helpful and desired when connected to the speaker output, but used as helmet headphones.

Additionally, if the radio provides speaker muting during xmit, you would have no 'sidetone'. Something else to consider.

[quote]So the question is, how are these speakers that I am about to stick into my helmet going to react when the radio output is fed to them? If their impedance is low I'm guessing that will impact the volume, so I imagine I will have to turn the radio volume up? It a noisy airplane and is already up fairly high. Can I add some resistors to help out? Do I connect both speakers to the tels output (doesn't that cut the already low impedance in half?) Are all electret mics the same?

Thanks, Peter[b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:54 am    Post subject: Headphone impedance Reply with quote

So the question is, how are these speakers that I am about to stick into my helmet going to react when the radio output is fed to them? If their impedance is low I'm guessing that will impact the volume, so I imagine I will have to turn the radio volume up? It a noisy airplane and is already up fairly high. Can I add some resistors to help out? Do I connect both speakers to the tels output (doesn't that cut the already low impedance in half?)

They're going to be fine . . . in fact, perhaps TOO fine.
1 mW of audio into an efficient headphone is quite audible.
The power delivered to the popular ear-buds is on the order
of hundreds of microwatts.

Check the chapter on audio systems for the significance
of "output impedance" as a listed characteristic of an
accessory. You'll have PLENTY of output capability from
the speaker connections for this radio. In face, you'll
probably want to add some resistance in series with the
headset leads such that a comfortable listening level
is achieved at 1/3 to 1/2 of volume control travel.

Another reader suggested that use of the radio's speaker
output would probalby kill the sidetone feature for
being able to monitor your transmitted signal.

You COULD use an audio isolation amplifier like:

http://www.aeroelectric.com/Catalog/AEC/9009/

Using such a device between your radio's headset
output and the low impedance headphones keeps
the sidetone feature working and takes care of
any integration problems that might be encountered
by direct connection.


Are all electret mics the same?

The microphones are all built on the same technology.
The ELECTRONICS that converts a delta-charge into
some value of delta-voltage is super simple. Bias
the microphone element up through a resistor and take
the audio off the junction between microphone element
and resistor. Aircraft radios are unique amongst voice
communications technologies. WAAaayyy back when, the first
radio-telephone transmitters were fitted with the most
popular microphone technology of the time that was
shared with the telephone.

Like the electret mic, the carbon mike needs to be powered
by it's associated circuitry. The carbon microphone
is a relatively low impedance, variable resistance, high
output device VERY suited to the telephone which takes
operating power from the wires that come into the back
of building.

The electret is a high impedance, variable voltage, low
output device. It also needs to be powered. But to emulate
the legacy carbon microphone, it needs some electronics.
An exemplar circuit is shown below.
[img]cid:.0[/img]



Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List



314c088.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  92.25 KB
 Viewed:  7909 Time(s)

314c088.jpg



Electret-Carbon_1.gif
 Description:
 Filesize:  6.81 KB
 Viewed:  7909 Time(s)

Electret-Carbon_1.gif



Electret-Carbon_1.gif
 Description:
 Filesize:  6.81 KB
 Viewed:  7909 Time(s)

Electret-Carbon_1.gif


Back to top
rjquillin



Joined: 13 May 2007
Posts: 123
Location: KSEE

PostPosted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:24 am    Post subject: Headphone impedance Reply with quote

Bob,

From the original post I interpreted, perhaps incorrectly, that these would be connected to the HP output.
Quote:
Do I connect both speakers to the tels output

and based my reply on that assumption. And as assumptions are fraught with issues, asked:
Quote:
From your post, it is unclear if you plan on connecting your helmet speakers to the speaker output, or the headphone output?

to clarify the issue.

So, lacking knowledge of the Becker output topology, I'll still stand by my comments.
Connecting a four, or eight ohm, load to a 600 ohm source could be problematic.
Additionally, if the drivers he is proposing to use are four ohm, and connected in parallel, they would present a two ohm load to the output circuit...

At 10:45 12/1/2010, you wrote:
[quote]From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com>

So the question is, how are these speakers that I am about to stick into my helmet going to react when the radio output is fed to them? If their impedance is low I'm guessing that will impact the volume, so I imagine I will have to turn the radio volume up? It a noisy airplane and is already up fairly high. Can I add some resistors to help out? Do I connect both speakers to the tels output (doesn't that cut the already low impedance in half?)

They're going to be fine . . . in fact, perhaps TOO fine.
1 mW of audio into an efficient headphone is quite audible.
The power delivered to the popular ear-buds is on the order
of hundreds of microwatts.

Check the chapter on audio systems for the significance
of "output impedance" as a listed characteristic of an
accessory. You'll have PLENTY of output capability from
the speaker connections for this radio. In face, you'll
probably want to add some resistance in series with the
headset leads such that a comfortable listening level
is achieved at 1/3 to 1/2 of volume control travel.

Another reader suggested that use of the radio's speaker
output would probalby kill the sidetone feature for
being able to monitor your transmitted signal.[b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 7:33 pm    Post subject: Headphone impedance Reply with quote

At 01:20 PM 12/1/2010, you wrote:
Quote:
Bob,

So, lacking knowledge of the Becker output topology, I'll still
stand by my comments.
Connecting a four, or eight ohm, load to a 600 ohm source could be
problematic.
Additionally, if the drivers he is proposing to use are four ohm,
and connected in parallel, they would present a two ohm load to the
output circuit...

It's certainly problematic. At the same time
I don't think it represents a hazard to
system components. I think all the specialty
chips designed to drive audio loads (line,
spkr, phones, etc) are inherently overload
protected.

It's unfortunate that the folks who write
black box specifications don't seem to have
a grasp of the notion of "output impedance".

What most installation manuals need to say
is something like . . .

Headphones Output: 1 V rms minimum into
100 ohms. Now, I pulled those numbers out
of the air but the intent is to illustrated
the radio's ability to drive perhaps as many
as 6 pairs of headsets in parallel and still
offer an output voltage equal to or greater
than ear-spltting levels with poor efficiency
headphones. Nobody's output impedance is really
600 ohms. See the first 3 pages of chapter 18.

But it's also true that the radio's headset
audio output device might go into a self-
preserving current limit when presented with the low
impedance loads of the proposed helmet speakers.

So it takes a bit more current to drive these
speakers masquerading as headphones. This COULD
come from the radio's own speaker output or
by using a device like an isolation amplifier.

The headphone/speakers are probably 8 ohm or
greater. I've run across small speakers with
impedances of 20 to 30 ohms. Wiring them in
series would offer at least a 16 ohm load.
It's entirely possible that the headset output
RATED to deliver energy to a 600 ohm load will
work okay with the new configuration.

I think the risks to hardware are low. A
simple experiment will determine the facts.

Peter, have you looked at these speakers
with an ohmmeter?
Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
rjquillin(at)cox.net
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:47 pm    Post subject: Headphone impedance Reply with quote

Some worthy observations you've made Bob.

I did some digging, and have attached an IM for the unit.
Of interest in section "C" and "D" on pdf page 21:

C. Speaker connection
A 4 to 8 Ohm speaker can be connected to audio output P1- 1AF-asym.
CAUTION : The magnetic field of a speaker influences the magnetic compass.
When choosing the mounting point, a minimum distance of 1.3 m
must be maintained between the speaker and the magnetic compass.

D. Headphone connection
Up to two headphones with an impedance of 600 Ohm can be connected to
the audio output P1 - 2,3 AF-HI/LO.

At 19:29 12/1/2010, you wrote:
Quote:
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com>

At 01:20 PM 12/1/2010, you wrote:
Quote:
Bob,

So, lacking knowledge of the Becker output topology, I'll still stand by my comments.
Connecting a four, or eight ohm, load to a 600 ohm source could be problematic.
Additionally, if the drivers he is proposing to use are four ohm, and connected in parallel, they would present a two ohm load to the output circuit...

It's certainly problematic. At the same time
I don't think it represents a hazard to
system components. I think all the specialty
chips designed to drive audio loads (line,
spkr, phones, etc) are inherently overload
protected.

It's unfortunate that the folks who write
black box specifications don't seem to have
a grasp of the notion of "output impedance".

What most installation manuals need to say
is something like . . .

Headphones Output: 1 V rms minimum into
100 ohms. Now, I pulled those numbers out
of the air but the intent is to illustrated
the radio's ability to drive perhaps as many
as 6 pairs of headsets in parallel and still
offer an output voltage equal to or greater
than ear-spltting levels with poor efficiency
headphones. Nobody's output impedance is really
600 ohms. See the first 3 pages of chapter 18.

But it's also true that the radio's headset
audio output device might go into a self-
preserving current limit when presented with the low
impedance loads of the proposed helmet speakers.

So it takes a bit more current to drive these
speakers masquerading as headphones. This COULD
come from the radio's own speaker output or
by using a device like an isolation amplifier.

The headphone/speakers are probably 8 ohm or
greater. I've run across small speakers with
impedances of 20 to 30 ohms. Wiring them in
series would offer at least a 16 ohm load.
It's entirely possible that the headset output
RATED to deliver energy to a 600 ohm load will
work okay with the new configuration.

I think the risks to hardware are low. A
simple experiment will determine the facts.

Peter, have you looked at these speakers
with an ohmmeter?


Bob . . .

Month --
Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!)
on
www.aeroelectric.com
www.buildersbooks.com
www.homebuilthelp.com
http://www.matronics.com/contribution
-Matt Dralle, List Admin.
AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
- MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
http://forums.matronics.com



- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List



AR4201-I+O.pdf
 Description:

Download
 Filename:  AR4201-I+O.pdf
 Filesize:  281.07 KB
 Downloaded:  369 Time(s)

Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:43 am    Post subject: Headphone impedance Reply with quote

At 01:43 AM 12/2/2010, you wrote:
Quote:
Some worthy observations you've made Bob.

I did some digging, and have attached an IM for the unit.
Of interest in section "C" and "D" on pdf page 21:

C. Speaker connection
A 4 to 8 Ohm speaker can be connected to audio output P1- 1AF-asym.
CAUTION : The magnetic field of a speaker influences the magnetic compass.
When choosing the mounting point, a minimum distance of 1.3 m
must be maintained between the speaker and the magnetic compass.

Yeah . . . those recommendations were written
based on magnetic interference studies done
many moons ago when it was common practice
to mount a speaker in the cabin overhead.
Believe me, those were CHEAP speakers and
not terribly well shielded magnetically.
Further, there was no way you could get 1.3M
separation from the whisky compass . . . but
that's another problem.

Quote:
D. Headphone connection
Up to two headphones with an impedance of 600 Ohm can be connected to
the audio output P1 - 2,3 AF-HI/LO.

It may well be that the speaker/headset configuration
Peter is proposing won't drive from the headset
output of the radio. In this case, some amplification
is called for.

I've been using a number of pre-packaged
amplifiers off ebay . . . very reasonably
priced. Here's an example that can be
had for $6 postage paid.

http://tinyurl.com/3a6oy7x

It needs to be boxed and power conditioned
for attaching to a DC bus . . . and probably
some gain setting resistors . . . but
a quick and dirty way to get substantial
boost to a stereo headset using low
impedance "speakers".

Thanks for the manual. I've added it to my
manufacturer's data library.

Bob . . .


[quote][b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
rjquillin(at)cox.net
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:06 am    Post subject: Headphone impedance Reply with quote

At 10:39 12/2/2010, you wrote:
Quote:
Thanks for the manual. I've added it to my
manufacturer's data library.

Bob . . .

Always glad to add to the community library!

tnx
Ron [quote][b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
peter(at)sportingaero.com
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 2:02 pm    Post subject: Headphone impedance Reply with quote

Thanks for all of the input!
We've had 6" of snow over the last couple of days, so getting into the shop is not so easy - measuring the resistance of the speakers will have to wait for a few days. They are 30mm in diameter and 8mm thick, but don't have any kind of identifying marks on them.
I would like to use the standard headphone output from the radio as its already wired in - and I didn't even wire up the speaker pin from the radio, that would also make the set up transferable to other aircraft. It also occurred to me that the standard radio will drive at least 2 headsets in parallel - so a combined impedance of 300 ohms - but Ron got there first!

To summarize what has been said,
- Its likely that an aviation radio headset output would overdrive these speakers (resulting in poor volume control and possibly poor quality output), and may suffer some damage to the radio audio amplifier (unlikely).
- To use these speakers/phones I will probably need an audio isolation amplifier (made as described in Bob's note)
- Alternatively an amp from ebay may suffice ( for $6 seems a no brainer Smile ) - but may require some power conditioning (interesting that specs say 4.5v, but legend on board says 12v), and also some gain setting resistors [how do I calculate the value?]
- To use the electret mic I will have to build a circuit per Bob's sketch.

I think there are are potentially 3 ways ahead.
1. Buy amp above and start making mic circuit (perhaps gives the ability to add an ipod input in the future)
2. Cannibalise an old headset (at least all the components should match)
3. Use the Halo headset for the time being and just figure out sticking the ear plugs in my ears with the helmet around my neck ...

Thanks for your help, Peter

PS I also found these to provide some eye protection
http://www.davida.co.uk/type.php?id=Visor_D4Vi9A

On 02/12/2010 18:39, Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote: [quote] At 01:43 AM 12/2/2010, you wrote:
Quote:
Some worthy observations you've made Bob.

I did some digging, and have attached an IM for the unit.
Of interest in section "C" and "D" on pdf page 21:

C. Speaker connection
A 4 to 8 Ohm speaker can be connected to audio output P1- 1AF-asym.
CAUTION : The magnetic field of a speaker influences the magnetic compass.
When choosing the mounting point, a minimum distance of 1.3 m
must be maintained between the speaker and the magnetic compass.

Yeah . . . those recommendations were written
based on magnetic interference studies done
many moons ago when it was common practice
to mount a speaker in the cabin overhead.
Believe me, those were CHEAP speakers and
not terribly well shielded magnetically.
Further, there was no way you could get 1.3M
separation from the whisky compass . . . but
that's another problem.

Quote:
D. Headphone connection
Up to two headphones with an impedance of 600 Ohm can be connected to
the audio output P1 - 2,3 AF-HI/LO.

It may well be that the speaker/headset configuration
Peter is proposing won't drive from the headset
output of the radio. In this case, some amplification
is called for.

I've been using a number of pre-packaged
amplifiers off ebay . . . very reasonably
priced. Here's an example that can be
had for $6 postage paid.

http://tinyurl.com/3a6oy7x

It needs to be boxed and power conditioned
for attaching to a DC bus . . . and probably
some gain setting resistors . . . but
a quick and dirty way to get substantial
boost to a stereo headset using low
impedance "speakers".

Thanks for the manual. I've added it to my
manufacturer's data library.

Bob . . .


Quote:


[b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
peter(at)sportingaero.com
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:17 pm    Post subject: Headphone impedance Reply with quote

Also found user's guide for the ebay amp

http://www.sure-electronics.net/download/AA-AB3213X_Ver1.0_EN.pdf

catalogue here

http://www.sureelectronics.net/Amplifier.pdf

Peter

On 02/12/2010 21:58, Peter Pengilly wrote: [quote] Thanks for all of the input!
We've had 6" of snow over the last couple of days, so getting into the shop is not so easy - measuring the resistance of the speakers will have to wait for a few days. They are 30mm in diameter and 8mm thick, but don't have any kind of identifying marks on them.
I would like to use the standard headphone output from the radio as its already wired in - and I didn't even wire up the speaker pin from the radio, that would also make the set up transferable to other aircraft. It also occurred to me that the standard radio will drive at least 2 headsets in parallel - so a combined impedance of 300 ohms - but Ron got there first!

To summarize what has been said,
- Its likely that an aviation radio headset output would overdrive these speakers (resulting in poor volume control and possibly poor quality output), and may suffer some damage to the radio audio amplifier (unlikely).
- To use these speakers/phones I will probably need an audio isolation amplifier (made as described in Bob's note)
- Alternatively an amp from ebay may suffice ( for $6 seems a no brainer Smile ) - but may require some power conditioning (interesting that specs say 4.5v, but legend on board says 12v), and also some gain setting resistors [how do I calculate the value?]
- To use the electret mic I will have to build a circuit per Bob's sketch.

I think there are are potentially 3 ways ahead.
1. Buy amp above and start making mic circuit (perhaps gives the ability to add an ipod input in the future)
2. Cannibalise an old headset (at least all the components should match)
3. Use the Halo headset for the time being and just figure out sticking the ear plugs in my ears with the helmet around my neck ...

Thanks for your help, Peter

PS I also found these to provide some eye protection
http://www.davida.co.uk/type.php?id=Visor_D4Vi9A

On 02/12/2010 18:39, Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote:
Quote:
At 01:43 AM 12/2/2010, you wrote:
Quote:
Some worthy observations you've made Bob.

I did some digging, and have attached an IM for the unit.
Of interest in section "C" and "D" on pdf page 21:

C. Speaker connection
A 4 to 8 Ohm speaker can be connected to audio output P1- 1AF-asym.
CAUTION : The magnetic field of a speaker influences the magnetic compass.
When choosing the mounting point, a minimum distance of 1.3 m
must be maintained between the speaker and the magnetic compass.

Yeah . . . those recommendations were written
based on magnetic interference studies done
many moons ago when it was common practice
to mount a speaker in the cabin overhead.
Believe me, those were CHEAP speakers and
not terribly well shielded magnetically.
Further, there was no way you could get 1.3M
separation from the whisky compass . . . but
that's another problem.

Quote:
D. Headphone connection
Up to two headphones with an impedance of 600 Ohm can be connected to
the audio output P1 - 2,3 AF-HI/LO.

It may well be that the speaker/headset configuration
Peter is proposing won't drive from the headset
output of the radio. In this case, some amplification
is called for.

I've been using a number of pre-packaged
amplifiers off ebay . . . very reasonably
priced. Here's an example that can be
had for $6 postage paid.

http://tinyurl.com/3a6oy7x

It needs to be boxed and power conditioned
for attaching to a DC bus . . . and probably
some gain setting resistors . . . but
a quick and dirty way to get substantial
boost to a stereo headset using low
impedance "speakers".

Thanks for the manual. I've added it to my
manufacturer's data library.

Bob . . .


Quote:




[b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 5:02 pm    Post subject: Headphone impedance Reply with quote

At 05:11 PM 12/2/2010, you wrote:
Quote:
Also found user's guide for the ebay amp

http://www.sure-electronics.net/download/AA-AB3213X_Ver1.0_EN.pdf

catalogue here

http://www.sureelectronics.net/Amplifier.pdf

Thanks for the links. I've used several devices
from this firm. They're an excellent value and
perform as advertised.


Bob . . . [quote][b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 5:19 pm    Post subject: Headphone impedance Reply with quote

At 03:58 PM 12/2/2010, you wrote:
Thanks for all of the input!

I would like to use the standard headphone output from the radio as
its already wired in - and I didn't even wire up the speaker pin from
the radio, that would also make the set up transferable to other aircraft.

The only way you can make this 100% transportable is
to add the necessary electronics to make your headset
EMULATE the standard headset. I.e., 600 ohms of load.
Back in the days I was burning my fingers and
sniffing the smoke over my first soldering iron,
the 'standard' headset was 2000 ohms impedance.
These integrated well with popular crystal and vacuum
tube radios.

2K headsets are no longer made in volume and expensive.
However, there are PLENTY of low impedance headsets
for as little as $1 a pair that work with modern
entertainment devices. A few years ago, I designed
a small battery powered amplifier with a 2K input
impedance and adjusted the gain such that similar
signals produced the same sounds from the headsets.
I.e., the modern el-cheapo headsets could be used
on homebrew projects with similar performance as
headsets of yesteryear.

- Its likely that an aviation radio headset output would overdrive
these speakers

. . . probably UNDER-DRIVE. The electronics within
the radio simply may not be capable of delivering
the necessary energy into the lower impedance
devices.

(resulting in poor volume control and possibly poor quality
output), and may suffer some damage to the radio audio amplifier (unlikely).

. . . mostly. The probable effect is that the received
audio will be heard but an severely reduced volume.

- To use these speakers/phones I will probably need an audio
isolation amplifier (made as described in Bob's note)

Quite likely. Further, if you're really interested
in moving across airplanes with this, then your
"adapter" may want to be a fat lump in the cordage
for the speaker/microphone set.

- Alternatively an amp from ebay may suffice ( for $6 seems a no
brainer Smile ) - but may require some power conditioning (interesting
that specs say 4.5v, but legend on board says 12v).

The major concern is for conducted noise and transient
voltages. You'll want to use a three-terminal regulator
to "step" down the 14v bus to say 9 volts. The regulator
will provide the isolation from transients and very good
filtering of bus noises.

and also some gain setting resistors [how do I calculate the value?]

Cut and try during the brass-board phase.

- To use the electret mic I will have to build a circuit per Bob's sketch.

This too will need to be brass-boarded and checked
on the bench. Do you have a harness to run the radio
on the workbench?

I think there are are potentially 3 ways ahead.

1. Buy amp above and start making mic circuit (perhaps gives the
ability to add an ipod input in the future)

Recommended.

2. Cannibalise an old headset (at least all the components should match)

Risky for mechanical issues. If you have mic and
headset components with a good track record and they
fit the helmet . . . then 80% of the battle is won.

3. Use the Halo headset for the time being and just figure out
sticking the ear plugs in my ears with the helmet around my neck ...

Ugh!

Bob . . .


Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
peter(at)sportingaero.com
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:08 am    Post subject: Headphone impedance Reply with quote

Hi Bob,

Thanks very much for all of that - it will certainly keep me busy over
the next few weeks. This is about on the raggedy edge of my electronics
capability so should be an interesting learning curve! Yes, installing a
box in the fly lead between helmet and radio plugs is clearly the way to
go. The radio connector is a Dsub, so no problems making a test harness.

Peter

On 03/12/2010 01:16, Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote:
Quote:

<nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com>

At 03:58 PM 12/2/2010, you wrote:
Thanks for all of the input!

I would like to use the standard headphone output from the radio as
its already wired in - and I didn't even wire up the speaker pin from
the radio, that would also make the set up transferable to other
aircraft.

The only way you can make this 100% transportable is
to add the necessary electronics to make your headset
EMULATE the standard headset. I.e., 600 ohms of load.
Back in the days I was burning my fingers and
sniffing the smoke over my first soldering iron,
the 'standard' headset was 2000 ohms impedance.
These integrated well with popular crystal and vacuum
tube radios.

2K headsets are no longer made in volume and expensive.
However, there are PLENTY of low impedance headsets
for as little as $1 a pair that work with modern
entertainment devices. A few years ago, I designed
a small battery powered amplifier with a 2K input
impedance and adjusted the gain such that similar
signals produced the same sounds from the headsets.
I.e., the modern el-cheapo headsets could be used
on homebrew projects with similar performance as
headsets of yesteryear.

- Its likely that an aviation radio headset output would overdrive
these speakers

. . . probably UNDER-DRIVE. The electronics within
the radio simply may not be capable of delivering
the necessary energy into the lower impedance
devices.

(resulting in poor volume control and possibly poor quality output),
and may suffer some damage to the radio audio amplifier (unlikely).

. . . mostly. The probable effect is that the received
audio will be heard but an severely reduced volume.

- To use these speakers/phones I will probably need an audio isolation
amplifier (made as described in Bob's note)

Quite likely. Further, if you're really interested
in moving across airplanes with this, then your
"adapter" may want to be a fat lump in the cordage
for the speaker/microphone set.

- Alternatively an amp from ebay may suffice ( for $6 seems a no
brainer Smile ) - but may require some power conditioning (interesting
that specs say 4.5v, but legend on board says 12v).

The major concern is for conducted noise and transient
voltages. You'll want to use a three-terminal regulator
to "step" down the 14v bus to say 9 volts. The regulator
will provide the isolation from transients and very good
filtering of bus noises.

and also some gain setting resistors [how do I calculate the value?]

Cut and try during the brass-board phase.

- To use the electret mic I will have to build a circuit per Bob's
sketch.

This too will need to be brass-boarded and checked
on the bench. Do you have a harness to run the radio
on the workbench?

I think there are are potentially 3 ways ahead.

1. Buy amp above and start making mic circuit (perhaps gives the
ability to add an ipod input in the future)

Recommended.

2. Cannibalise an old headset (at least all the components should match)

Risky for mechanical issues. If you have mic and
headset components with a good track record and they
fit the helmet . . . then 80% of the battle is won.

3. Use the Halo headset for the time being and just figure out
sticking the ear plugs in my ears with the helmet around my neck ...

Ugh!

Bob . . .


Bob . . .



- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group