blorber(at)southwestcirru Guest
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:55 pm Post subject: Another fuel contamination case? (from this past summer) |
|
|
I can't believe the CFI would admit to taking the controls. The only
benefit to being a CFI is to log PIC/approaches/landings without
officially doing a darn thing but enjoying the scenery.
Emergency expectations are part of my portion of the pre-flight brief:
"You are the pilot-in-command. In case of emergency, you will remain
the pilot-in-command. At no time will I take the controls unless you
request it, and then we will do a positive exchange of controls. You
say, 'you have the controls.' I will respond, 'I have the controls,'
and shake the stick."
Of course, I'm always available to assist and/or nudge in the right
direction.
Cate Chagnot wrote:
Quote: |
Makes me wonder who was actually PIC, the pilot/owner or the CFI? It seems that the CFI took over when the left engine quit and then dealt with the right engine failure and landing. I'm sure both were working hard at doing everything they could but who gets the credit for the landing?
Cate
N4278S
--------
Cate
N4278S 680E
Skywagon N180PK
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=324152#324152
|
| - The Matronics Commander-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List |
|
|
|