Tim Olson
Joined: 25 Jan 2007
Posts: 2872
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:39 am Post subject: FAA Chart Data |
 |
|
This is old new for those that read AvWeb today, but since I
haven't heard anyone mention what happened at the Dec. 13
meeting, I thought I'd post the latest here. Sounds
eggspensive.
Tim
------------------------------------------------------
FAA AeroNav Meeting: Radically Higher Prices for Digital Charting
Proposed (Updated)
The FAA's AeroNav charting division told vendors this week that it
proposes to charge end users of digital charting producers about $150 a
year to close a $5 million shortfall in its budget due to declining
paper chart sales. The new fee, if adopted, would presumably more than
double the cost of some popular iPad and Droid applications such as
ForeFlight and WingX. Plus, vendors selling through Apple's application
channels would face additional charges. "To me, it's pretty clear that
these prices are a non-starter. I know pilots aren't going to pay $150
for these products without screaming about it," one vendor told us.
And because AeroNav's incremental pricing favors large-volume vendors
over smaller ones, the pricing change may effectively kill smaller
application writers and/or free sites that offer FAA charting products
as a convenience for users. That might include DUATs contractors, which
offer free charts on the two sites.
Moreover, the FAA told about 70 vendors that as paper sales continue to
decline, the FAA charges for digital charting products are likely to
increase in order to cover fixed overhead costs. The agency also assured
the vendors that it would not be developing any apps or other products
to compete with them.
Tuesday's meeting, which was closed to the public and press, had been
billed as an information gathering session so the AeroNav group could
reach pricing that worked for everyone. Based on conversations with
several vendors, we would say reaction to the FAA's proposals were mixed
at best. "The FAA did a remarkably good job in soliciting opinion," one
vendor told us, "I'm actually fairly hopeful." Mark Spenser of
Avilution, a newer aviation app for Android, says he's not sure he'll
stay in the business if the FAA's proposed charges are adopted. "It's
too early to tell," he said. The FAA also realizes there will have to be
some other structure for websites that display charts, like FltPlan.com
or RunwayFinder. Dave Parsons of RunwayFinder told us, "I won't be able
to do it for even a dollar a user [per year]."
The assembled vendors were told that the FAA will announce a detailed
proposal by mid-January and the new charges will go into effect in
April, 2012. But one of the participants we spoke to on Wednesday said
that timeline is "totally unrealistic." He expressed further skepticism
that the FAA made its case the its economics justify such steep price
increases. Several vendors we spoke to told us there wasn't much give
and take and that AeroNav presented their price structure in a way that
suggested little flexibility. Michael Wolf, president of Sporty's, told
us Wednesday that he remained unconvinced that AeroNav had made a
legitimate effort to close its budget shortfall by cutting its expenses.
As for the new prices, vendors questioned how the agency arrived at its
numbers. The FAA seems to have grossly underestimated the number of
potential users, vendors told us. They told the assembled vendors that
the $150/year number was based on their estimated number of users
divided into the $5 million shortfall. But that's only about 33,000
users. Vendors tell us the real number is more than 100,000. That may be
good news for driving down the final price for subscriptions eventually,
but for the short term, it means higher costs for vendors. It's also
true that bigger companies will have the right to resell charts to
start-ups, who might want only single-updates or charts for a specific
area of the country to trim costs. However there might be an inherent
conflict of interest in doing so.
Bigger companies also will have an edge as the proposed pricing is
regressive: For example, a vendor with up to 100 customers would pay
$250 per customer, while one with up to 1,500 might pay $120. There was
also a flat-fee proposal where zero to 100 customers would be
$25,000/year, 100 to 250 would be $50,000/year and so on. It's unclear
which of those options might go into effect, but AeroNav told the
vendors the prices proposed are in a general range.
When asked if AeroNav could make up the $5 million by reducing its
expenses, FAA officials said no, although budget relief from Congress
might be an option. FAA officials deflected several specific questions
about AeroNav's budgeting and costs, which Sporty's Wolf told us he
thinks they will need to do.
In addressing the group, Fred Anderson, AeroNav's director of products,
told the vendors that the FAA has always charged user fees for charting
products, dating to the 1920s, when the government was authorized by
Congress to collect fees limited to paper and printing. The current law
allows AeroNav to charge for printing and distribution, but also for
management of databases used for chart preparation. It cannot charge for
the acquisition or distribution of flight data required to make charts.
Heretofore, AeroNav has charged a nominal fee for digital chart data it
sold on DVDs. It has also allowed all comers to download the digital
data at no charge, an arrangement that made attractive economics for
some application writers. Vendor costs for the DVD have been on the
order of $200 a year, but with no end user limitations, they amortize
this over hundreds or thousands of customers.
AeroNav also proposed that vendors will be required to become chart
sales agents and will be subject to audit by AeroNav to confirm they're
charging customers correctly, which will cost vendors -- and customers
-- yet more money. Vendors told us the FAA hopes to finalize its
pricing, contractual agreement and other issues brought up in today's
meeting by early January. We'll gauge pilot reaction after the numbers
are finalized.
On Tuesday, the FAA did not return our request for comment by our
deadline, but spokesman Laura Brown said Wednesday the agency would
respond to detailed queries for follow-up stories later this week.
| | - The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List |
|
|
|
Get Email Distribution Too!
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
