|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dave.saylor.aircrafters(a Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 3:43 pm Post subject: Right-angle adapter |
|
|
Is it any less efficient for RF to use a right-angle adapter with a straight BNC on the end of an RG-400 cable, as opposed to right-angle connector crimped to the cable? An adapter plus straight connector is about half the cost of a right-angle crimp connector.
Dave Saylor
AirCrafters
140 Aviation Way
Watsonville, CA 95076
831-722-9141 Shop
831-750-0284 Cell
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ceengland(at)bellsouth.ne Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:10 pm Post subject: Right-angle adapter |
|
|
On 02/01/2012 05:29 PM, Dave Saylor wrote:
Quote: | Is it any less efficient for RF to use a right-angle adapter with a
straight BNC on the end of an RG-400 cable, as opposed to right-angle
connector crimped to the cable? An adapter plus straight connector is
about half the cost of a right-angle crimp connector.
Dave Saylor
AirCrafters
140 Aviation Way
Watsonville, CA 95076
831-722-9141 Shop
831-750-0284 Cell
Short answer: it's less efficient.
|
Less Short answer: You'll never be able to tell the difference without
multi-kilobuck test gear.
I know what I'd do.
Charlie
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:59 pm Post subject: Right-angle adapter |
|
|
At 05:29 PM 2/1/2012, you wrote:
Quote: | Is it any less efficient for RF to use a right-angle adapter with a straight BNC on the end of an RG-400 cable, as opposed to right-angle connector crimped to the cable? An adapter plus straight connector is about half the cost of a right-angle crimp connector. |
Either technique is fine. In fact, I published
the po' boy's rt-angle bnc cable male ploy
here a few years ago:
http://aeroelectric.com/articles/BNC_Rt_Angle/BNC_Rt_Angle.html
but then I found an economical source for
one piece right angle connectors:
http://tinyurl.com/76jdnua
Bob . . . [quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dave.saylor.aircrafters(a Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:11 pm Post subject: Right-angle adapter |
|
|
Hmm...does trying to transmit 20 or 30 miles count as test gear? I think I have the multi-kilobuck part covered  Seriously, if it doesn't make any noticeable difference for voice quality in and out, I know what to do too.
Thanks!
Dave Saylor
AirCrafters
140 Aviation Way
Watsonville, CA 95076
831-722-9141 Shop
831-750-0284 Cell
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Charlie England <ceengland(at)bellsouth.net (ceengland(at)bellsouth.net)> wrote:
[quote] --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Charlie England <ceengland(at)bellsouth.net (ceengland(at)bellsouth.net)>
On 02/01/2012 05:29 PM, Dave Saylor wrote:
Quote: | Is it any less efficient for RF to use a right-angle adapter with a straight BNC on the end of an RG-400 cable, as opposed to right-angle connector crimped to the cable? Â An adapter plus straight connector is about half the cost of a right-angle crimp connector.
Dave Saylor
AirCrafters
140 Aviation Way
Watsonville, CA 95076
[url=tel:831-722-9141]831-722-9141[/url]Â Shop
[url=tel:831-750-0284]831-750-0284[/url]Â Cell
| Short answer: it's less efficient.
Less Short answer: You'll never be able to tell the difference without multi-kilobuck test gear.
I know what I'd do.
Charlie
====================================
-
ric-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
====================================
MS -
k">http://forums.matronics.com
====================================
e -
     -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
t="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
====================================
[b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|