Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

New Airworthiness Directive

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Yak-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jill(at)m-14p.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:27 am    Post subject: New Airworthiness Directive Reply with quote

Gang,

Check it out:

http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/forms/Deviation%20Memo%20PDF.pdf

Jill
M-14P, Inc.
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
dsavarese0812(at)bellsout
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 7:27 am    Post subject: New Airworthiness Directive Reply with quote

Thanks Jill.
Dennis

A. Dennis Savarese
334-285-6263
334-546-8182 (cell)
Skype: Yakguy1
www.yak-52.com
On 2/4/2012 7:24 AM, Jill Gernetzke wrote:
Quote:

Gang,

Check it out:

http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/forms/Deviation%20Memo%20PDF.pdf

Jill

M-14P, Inc.

*
*


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
delfin_driver(at)yahoo.co
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:07 am    Post subject: New Airworthiness Directive Reply with quote

Does anyone know what was changed in this new addition??


From: A. Dennis Savarese <dsavarese0812(at)bellsouth.net>
To: yak-list(at)matronics.com
Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2012 9:23 AM
Subject: Re: New Airworthiness Directive


--> Yak-List message posted by: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese0812(at)bellsouth.net (dsavarese0812(at)bellsouth.net)>

Thanks Jill.
Dennis

A. Dennis Savarese
334-285-6263
334-546-8182 (cell)
Skype: Yakguy1
www.yak-52.com
On 2/4/2012 7:24 AM, Jill Gernetzke wrote:
[quote]
Gang,

Check it out:

http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/forms/Deviation%20Memo%20PDF.pdf

Jill

M-14P, I Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, gt;


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
czech6(at)mesanetworks.ne
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 6:40 pm    Post subject: New Airworthiness Directive Reply with quote

Nothing new.

Bill

On Feb 4, 2012, at 7:24 AM, "Jill Gernetzke" <jill(at)m-14p.com (jill(at)m-14p.com)> wrote:

[quote] <![endif]--> <![endif]-->
Gang,

Check it out:

http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/forms/Deviation%20Memo%20PDF.pdf

Jill
M-14P, Inc.
Quote:


[b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
dabear(at)devere.us
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:35 pm    Post subject: New Airworthiness Directive Reply with quote

I like how it says in a paragraph….

You can fly over congested areas

Then next paragraph….

You can fly over congested areas

Then next paragraph…

You can NEVER fly over congested areas….

Bear

From: owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Geipel
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2012 9:37 PM
To: yak-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: New Airworthiness Directive

Nothing new.

Bill




On Feb 4, 2012, at 7:24 AM, "Jill Gernetzke" <jill(at)m-14p.com (jill(at)m-14p.com)> wrote:
Quote:

Gang,

Check it out:

http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/forms/Deviation%20Memo%20PDF.pdf

Jill
M-14P, Inc.
Quote:

0
Quote:
1
Quote:
2
Quote:
3
Quote:
4
Quote:
5
Quote:
6
Quote:
7
Quote:
8
Quote:
9
Quote:
0
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
hess737(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 11:31 am    Post subject: New Airworthiness Directive Reply with quote

One less grouping. Many things are unchanged. Actually most things are good. The jet guys with ejection systems and hydraulic flight controls have potentially severe restrictions.

Richard Hess
C 404-964-4885


--


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
f4ffm2(at)roadrunner.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 12:27 pm    Post subject: New Airworthiness Directive Reply with quote

I've enjoyed scanning through this document....especially at 4110.e. Group 5 aircraft specs. In the "typical aircraft" for this group, the examples include the Fairey Rotodyne.

It struck me that this is a perfect example of a choice made by a bureaucrat without much of an idea of what goes on in the real world. Reason: the Fairey Rotodyne was a large prototype gyroplane capable of carrying 50+ passengers. It had two large turboprop engines mounted on stub wings but proved to be incredibly noisy because it also had rotor tip mounted jet engines; the project was canceled somewhere around 1960-61 and the sole example was scrapped.

Pretty unlikely that a Fairey Rotodyne would show up to be certified in Group 5, I think.
Roger___________________________________________________________
On Feb 4, 2012, at 5:24 AM, Jill Gernetzke wrote:
[quote]Gang,

Check it out:

http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/forms/Deviation%20Memo%20PDF.pdf

Jill
M-14P, Inc.

Quote:


style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://forums.matronics.com
style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/contribution


[b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
viperdoc(at)mindspring.co
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 7:20 pm    Post subject: New Airworthiness Directive Reply with quote

Do we still have to request the removal of the proficiency verbiage from our program letters if already not done beforehand? Since the majority of our aircraft are in the group 2 category.
Doc

Sent from my iPad

On Feb 4, 2012, at 7:24 AM, "Jill Gernetzke" <jill(at)m-14p.com (jill(at)m-14p.com)> wrote:

[quote]
Gang,

Check it out:

http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/forms/Deviation%20Memo%20PDF.pdf

Jill
M-14P, Inc.
Quote:


===================================
ef="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
===================================
ums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
===================================
http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===================================


[b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
jonboede(at)hotmail.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 8:42 pm    Post subject: New Airworthiness Directive Reply with quote

Yes... a simple way to do this is to have your aw and ops lims re-issued under 8130.2G ... FSDO can do a simple swap if you ask that way, or they can re-issue your old lims with the proficiency area limitation removed.  8130.2G is very friendly to group 2 so look through it and if you like what you see, just a re-issue under 8130.2G may be what you want.

Jon
Subject: Re: New Airworthiness Directive
From: viperdoc(at)mindspring.com
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 21:15:13 -0600
To: yak-list(at)matronics.com

Do we still have to request the removal of the proficiency verbiage from our program letters if already not done beforehand? Since the majority of our aircraft are in the group 2 category.
Doc

Sent from my iPad

On Feb 4, 2012, at 7:24 AM, "Jill Gernetzke" <jill(at)m-14p.com (jill(at)m-14p.com)> wrote:

[quote]
Gang,
 
Check it out:
 
[/url][url=http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/forms/Deviation%20Memo%20PDF.pdf]http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/forms/Deviation%20Memo%20PDF.pdf
 
Jill
M-14P, Inc.
Quote:


==========
ef="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
==========
ums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
==========
http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
==========




rget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
http://forums.matronics.com
="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution

[b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
hess737(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 4:35 am    Post subject: New Airworthiness Directive Reply with quote

Doc,
Remember that the new 8130.2G and its recent deviation waiver do NOT apply to any aircraft that already has an AW cert and ops limits. You conduct your flying according to your previously approved ops limits. they are on file with the FAA in DC. If you ask your FSDO to make a change to them, then you are open to having a whole set of new ops limits issued under the new order.


Richard Hess
C 404-964-4885


--


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
dsavarese0812(at)bellsout
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 4:58 am    Post subject: New Airworthiness Directive Reply with quote

All aircraft operate under the Operating Limitations that are current
for the aircraft regardless of when they were issued. Therefore, if the
OL's presently in the aircraft have never been updated to remove the 300
nm proficiency area, that limitation remains in force for the aircraft
until the OL's are reissued. If you want to remove the 300 NM
proficiency area, a new set of OL's must be issued for the aircraft by
your FSDO. There is no "automatic" or "by default" removal of the
limitation.
Dennis

A. Dennis Savarese
334-285-6263
334-546-8182 (cell)
Skype: Yakguy1
www.yak-52.com
On 2/5/2012 1:28 PM, Richard Hess wrote:
[quote] One less grouping. Many things are unchanged. Actually most things are
good. The jet guys with ejection systems and hydraulic flight controls
have potentially severe restrictions.

Richard Hess
C 404-964-4885
--


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
GeorgeCoy



Joined: 02 Dec 2010
Posts: 310

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:21 am    Post subject: New Airworthiness Directive Reply with quote

You underestimate the FAA guys who write the regs. They do have a sense of humor…

From: owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Roger Baker
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 3:25 PM
To: yak-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: New Airworthiness Directive

I've enjoyed scanning through this document....especially at 4110.e. Group 5 aircraft specs. In the "typical aircraft" for this group, the examples include the Fairey Rotodyne.


It struck me that this is a perfect example of a choice made by a bureaucrat without much of an idea of what goes on in the real world. Reason: the Fairey Rotodyne was a large prototype gyroplane capable of carrying 50+ passengers. It had two large turboprop engines mounted on stub wings but proved to be incredibly noisy because it also had rotor tip mounted jet engines; the project was canceled somewhere around 1960-61 and the sole example was scrapped.


Pretty unlikely that a Fairey Rotodyne would show up to be certified in Group 5, I think.



Roger___________________________________________________________
On Feb 4, 2012, at 5:24 AM, Jill Gernetzke wrote:


Gang,



Check it out:



http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/forms/Deviation%20Memo%20PDF.pdf



Jill

M-14P, Inc.
Quote:
style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-Listblue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://forums.matronics.comstyle="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/contribution





Quote:
0
Quote:
1
Quote:
2
Quote:
3
Quote:
4
Quote:
5
Quote:
6
Quote:
7
Quote:
8
Quote:
9
Quote:
style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
0
Quote:
style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
1
Quote:
style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
2
Quote:
style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
3
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
mark.bitterlich(at)navy.m
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 8:25 am    Post subject: New Airworthiness Directive Reply with quote

That is true with the exception of having the 300 mile limit removed.

The rules concerning having that removed specifically state that no
other operating limitations are to be changed. I've done this to both
of my Experimental Exhibition aircraft.

Mark Bitterlich


--


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
mark.bitterlich(at)navy.m
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 8:26 am    Post subject: New Airworthiness Directive Reply with quote

A new set of Operating Limitations do indeed have to be issued, but they
are not allowed to change any of them other than to remove the 300 NM
limitation. Just adding to what you already said Dennis. You are 100%
correct, as usual.

Mark
--


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
stephenmorrey(at)gmail.co
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 4:04 pm    Post subject: New Airworthiness Directive Reply with quote

Hey folks I sold my yak and don't need the yak list any more. Can someone tell me how to cancel my Yak list. Tks Steve On Feb 5, 2012 1:30 PM, "Roger Baker" <f4ffm2(at)roadrunner.com (f4ffm2(at)roadrunner.com)> wrote:[quote] I've enjoyed scanning through this document....especially at 4110.e. Group 5 aircraft specs.  In the "typical aircraft" for this group, the examples include the Fairey Rotodyne.  

It struck me that this is a perfect example of a choice made by a bureaucrat without much of an idea of what goes on in the real world.  Reason: the Fairey Rotodyne was a large prototype gyroplane capable of carrying 50+ passengers.  It had two large turboprop engines mounted on stub wings but proved to be incredibly noisy because it also had rotor tip mounted jet engines; the project was canceled somewhere around 1960-61 and the sole example was scrapped.

Pretty unlikely that a Fairey Rotodyne would show up to be certified in Group 5, I think.
Roger___________________________________________________________
On Feb 4, 2012, at 5:24 AM, Jill Gernetzke wrote:

Quote:
Gang,
 
Check it out:
 
http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/forms/Deviation%20Memo%20PDF.pdf
 
Jill
M-14P, Inc.

Quote:


style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://forums.matronics.com
style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/contribution





et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution


[b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
f4ffm2(at)roadrunner.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:03 pm    Post subject: New Airworthiness Directive Reply with quote

That is a startling concept!

_______________________________________________
On Feb 6, 2012, at 5:18 AM, George Coy wrote:
Quote:
You underestimate the FAA guys who write the regs. They do have a sense of humor…

From: owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com) [mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Roger Baker
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 3:25 PM
To: yak-list(at)matronics.com (yak-list(at)matronics.com)
Subject: Re: New Airworthiness Directive

I've enjoyed scanning through this document....especially at 4110.e. Group 5 aircraft specs. In the "typical aircraft" for this group, the examples include the Fairey Rotodyne.


It struck me that this is a perfect example of a choice made by a bureaucrat without much of an idea of what goes on in the real world. Reason: the Fairey Rotodyne was a large prototype gyroplane capable of carrying 50+ passengers. It had two large turboprop engines mounted on stub wings but proved to be incredibly noisy because it also had rotor tip mounted jet engines; the project was canceled somewhere around 1960-61 and the sole example was scrapped.


Pretty unlikely that a Fairey Rotodyne would show up to be certified in Group 5, I think.



Roger___________________________________________________________
On Feb 4, 2012, at 5:24 AM, Jill Gernetzke wrote:


Gang,



Check it out:



http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/forms/Deviation%20Memo%20PDF.pdf



Jill

M-14P, Inc.

Quote:
style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-Listblue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://forums.matronics.comstyle="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/contribution



Quote:
0
Quote:
1
Quote:
2
Quote:
3
Quote:
4
Quote:
5
Quote:
6
Quote:
7
Quote:
8
Quote:
9
Quote:
style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
0
Quote:
style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
1
Quote:
style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
2
Quote:
style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
3
Quote:
style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
4


Roger E. Baker, Managing Director
Panadero Energy Components, LLC
dba PEC AirAssist
760/809-5506
760/730-9244
760/454-4595 fax
f4ffm2(at)roadrunner.com (f4ffm2(at)roadrunner.com)




[quote][b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Yak-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group