|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mark.t.mueller(at)comcast Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:31 pm Post subject: High CHTs Epilogue |
|
|
A few weeks ago I asked for advice/comments on high CHTs after my annual inspection. I appreciate the responses I got back, and most concentrated on baffling and timing.
My IA swore the timing on the engine was correct, and the cabin heating duct in front of the exit ramp would not effect cooling flow much. Spent a day trying to troubleshoot, and he became convinced it was an instrumentation issue. Kind of made sense, but I was skeptical. He did find one of the CHT probes had significant tip wear (they were well over 10 years old...)
After new probe installation, the monitor indicated a 10 degree drop in CHTs, but still running well over 430 in cruise...
Last weekend, I re-routed the heater duct away and around the exit ramps. A pain, but just took some time and extra materials. Noticed an immediate improvement in cooling, but CHTs were still too high for my liking.
I ordered a Mag-Rite timing tool kit from ATS. Digital protractor and nylon cylinder probe to enable very precise location of actual TDC (as opposed to a mark on a ring and location on case.) Can't say enough good things about this kit (worth every penny), very easy to use, and the digital protractor has 1/10 degree resolution. Re-timed my mags (I have a LASAR ignition) to specs. To say the timing was 'off' is an understatement. It was WAY off. The smoothness of the LASAR masked the issue well, and the motor put out good power.
Now that it is 'dialed in' to within a tenth of a degree of accuracy, the CHTs dropped over 20F.
So, I improved cooling air flow, and fixed my timing. This is AFTER paying an IA for a complete annual, and coming back for troubleshooting.
At the end of the day, the lesson I learned is after over 10 years of ownership, I will know when 33R is "dialed in" or not regardless of what an IA may believe even if he has been taking care of this aircraft for several years... Mark
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
teamgrumman(at)yahoo.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 8:52 pm Post subject: High CHTs Epilogue |
|
|
Mark,
That's good to hear. When my plane is "dialed in" it will still run 410 straight and level at 4000 feet. Can't wait to get the IO360 on and finished.
Gary
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 21, 2012, at 6:30 PM, "Mark T. Mueller" <mark.t.mueller(at)comcast.net (mark.t.mueller(at)comcast.net)> wrote:
[quote]A few weeks ago I asked for advice/comments on high CHTs after my annual inspection. I appreciate the responses I got back, and most concentrated on baffling and timing.
My IA swore the timing on the engine was correct, and the cabin heating duct in front of the exit ramp would not effect cooling flow much. Spent a day trying to troubleshoot, and he became convinced it was an instrumentation issue. Kind of made sense, but I was skeptical. He did find one of the CHT probes had significant tip wear (they were well over 10 years old...)
After new probe installation, the monitor indicated a 10 degree drop in CHTs, but still running well over 430 in cruise...
Last weekend, I re-routed the heater duct away and around the exit ramps. A pain, but just took some time and extra materials. Noticed an immediate improvement in cooling, but CHTs were still too high for my liking.
I ordered a Mag-Rite timing tool kit from ATS. Digital protractor and nylon cylinder probe to enable very precise location of actual TDC (as opposed to a mark on a ring and location on case.) Can't say enough good things about this kit (worth every penny), very easy to use, and the digital protractor has 1/10 degree resolution. Re-timed my mags (I have a LASAR ignition) to specs. To say the timing was 'off' is an understatement. It was WAY off. The smoothness of the LASAR masked the issue well, and the motor put out good power.
Now that it is 'dialed in' to within a tenth of a degree of accuracy, the CHTs dropped over 20F.
So, I improved cooling air flow, and fixed my timing. This is AFTER paying an IA for a complete annual, and coming back for troubleshooting.
At the end of the day, the lesson I learned is after over 10 years of ownership, I will know when 33R is "dialed in" or not regardless of what an IA may believe even if he has been taking care of this aircraft for several years... Mark
Quote: |
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
|
[b]
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jwellum(at)AOL.COM Guest
|
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:22 am Post subject: High CHTs Epilogue |
|
|
The only time that I have seen temps over 400 degrees has been on newly installed cylinders and I have never seen the oil temp above 195. Typically see 375 on the hottest cylinder on a HOT day. Saturday morning was cool at about 50 degrees. I don't think the hottest cylinder made it to 360 degrees. That was at 2000 feet, leaned out, straight and level at 2700 rpm. Our plane has an EI, 4 probe CHT/EGT gauge which probably reads less than a JPI. Number 2 cylinder is always the coldest at about 320 degrees and sometimes I think it runs too cold.
In a message dated 4/21/2012 11:53:32 P.M. Central Daylight Time, teamgrumman(at)yahoo.com writes:
Quote: | Mark,
That's good to hear. When my plane is "dialed in" it will still run 410 straight and level at 4000 feet. Can't wait to get the IO360 on and finished.
Gary
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 21, 2012, at 6:30 PM, "Mark T. Mueller" <mark.t.mueller(at)comcast.net (mark.t.mueller(at)comcast.net)> wrote:
Quote: | A few weeks ago I asked for advice/comments on high CHTs after my annual inspection. I appreciate the responses I got back, and most concentrated on baffling and timing.
My IA swore the timing on the engine was correct, and the cabin heating duct in front of the exit ramp would not effect cooling flow much. Spent a day trying to troubleshoot, and he became convinced it was an instrumentation issue. Kind of made sense, but I was skeptical. He did find one of the CHT probes had significant tip wear (they were well over 10 years old...)
After new probe installation, the monitor indicated a 10 degree drop in CHTs, but still running well over 430 in cruise...
Last weekend, I re-routed the heater duct away and around the exit ramps. A pain, but just took some time and extra materials. Noticed an immediate improvement in cooling, but CHTs were still too high for my liking.
I ordered a Mag-Rite timing tool kit from ATS. Digital protractor and nylon cylinder probe to enable very precise location of actual TDC (as opposed to a mark on a ring and location on case.) Can't say enough good things about this kit (worth every penny), very easy to use, and the digital protractor has 1/10 degree resolution. Re-timed my mags (I have a LASAR ignition) to specs. To say the timing was 'off' is an understatement. It was WAY off. The smoothness of the LASAR masked the issue well, and the motor put out good power.
Now that it is 'dialed in' to within a tenth of a degree of accuracy, the CHTs dropped over 20F.
So, I improved cooling air flow, and fixed my timing. This is AFTER paying an IA for a complete annual, and coming back for troubleshooting.
At the end of the day, the lesson I learned is after over 10 years of ownership, I will know when 33R is "dialed in" or not regardless of what an IA may believe even if he has been taking care of this aircraft for several years...Mark
Quote: |
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
|
st href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List
s.matronics.com/">http://forums.matronics.com
p://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
|
|
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
teamgrumman(at)yahoo.com Guest
|
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:22 am Post subject: High CHTs Epilogue |
|
|
Based on a year of flying with an EI mounted above my JPI, I'd have to say that if you saw CHTs anywhere near 400 on an EI, be worried. A JPI would be showing over 470 at that point.
From: "jwellum(at)AOL.COM" <jwellum(at)AOL.COM>
To: teamgrumman-list(at)matronics.com
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: High CHTs Epilogue
The only time that I have seen temps over 400 degrees has been on newly installed cylinders and I have never seen the oil temp above 195. Typically see 375 on the hottest cylinder on a HOT day. Saturday morning was cool at about 50 degrees. I don't think the hottest cylinder made it to 360 degrees. That was at 2000 feet, leaned out, straight and level at 2700 rpm. Our plane has an EI, 4 probe CHT/EGT gauge which probably reads less than a JPI. Number 2 cylinder is always the coldest at about 320 degrees and sometimes I think it runs too cold.
In a message dated 4/21/2012 11:53:32 P.M. Central Daylight Time, teamgrumman(at)yahoo.com writes:
Quote: | Mark,
That's good to hear. When my plane is "dialed in" it will still run 410 straight and level at 4000 feet. Can't wait to get the IO360 on and finished.
Gary
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 21, 2012, at 6:30 PM, "Mark T. Mueller" <mark.t.mueller(at)comcast.net (mark.t.mueller(at)comcast.net)> wrote:
Quote: | A few weeks ago I asked for advice/comments on high CHTs after my annual inspection. I appreciate the responses I got back, and most concentrated on baffling and timing.
My IA swore the timing on the engine was correct, and the cabin heating duct in front of the exit ramp would not effect cooling flow much. Spent a day trying to troubleshoot, and he became convinced it was an instrumentation issue. Kind of made sense, but I was skeptical. He did find one of the CHT probes had significant tip wear (they were well over 10 years old...)
After new probe installation, the monitor indicated a 10 degree drop in CHTs, but still running well over 430 in cruise...
Last weekend, I re-routed the heater duct away and around the exit ramps. A pain, but just took some time and extra materials. Noticed an immediate improvement in cooling, but CHTs were still too high for my liking.
I ordered a Mag-Rite timing tool kit from ATS. Digital protractor and nylon cylinder probe to enable very precise location of actual TDC (as opposed to a mark on a ring and location on case.) Can't say enough good things about this kit (worth every penny), very easy to use, and the digital protractor has 1/10 degree resolution. Re-timed my mags (I have a LASAR ignition) to specs. To say the timing was 'off' is an understatement. It was WAY off. The smoothness of the LASAR masked the issue well, and the motor put out good power.
Now that it is 'dialed in' to within a tenth of a degree of accuracy, the CHTs dropped over 20F.
So, I improved cooling air flow, and fixed my timing. This is AFTER paying an IA for a complete annual, and coming back for troubleshooting.
At the end of the day, the lesson I learned is after over 10 years of ownership, I will know when 33R is "dialed in" or not regardless of what an IA may believe even if he has been taking care of this aircraft for several years...Mark
Quote: |
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
|
st href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List
s.matronics.com/">http://forums.matronics.com
p://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
|
|
Quote: | http://www.matronics.comlow" target="_blank" href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.m= --> |
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Discover
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 429
|
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:46 pm Post subject: High CHTs Epilogue |
|
|
I think you may be right about 320 being too cool. It seems my engine performs best when CHT's are in the 370 - 385 range when set for best power
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|