|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
aaaron(at)tvp.com.au Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:42 pm Post subject: instrument panel connectors |
|
|
If I were to make my instrument panel (mainly steam guages) removable, what would be the best type of connectors to use from a reliability, noise and maintenance perspective. I need to think about power, sensors and radio/audio. I realise that this may introduce some unreliability into the system - just wondering if I were to do this, what are the best type of connectors to use.
Thanks - Allan [quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BobsV35B(at)aol.com Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:14 am Post subject: instrument panel connectors |
|
|
Good Morning Allan,
A little over twenty years ago I set up my Bonanza floating panel so as to make it easily removable. I had a lot of switches mounted on the panel so there were a lot of connections other than the usual stock connectors on the individual instruments.
What I did was arrange to have just one static line and one pitot line going to the panel. The rest of that plumbing stayed with the removed panel. I used stock wrench removable B nut connectors for those two lines as well as all other plumbing. For all of the miscellaneous electrical items I installed a standard 60 pin CPC connector. Used about forty of the available spots. The CPC series of connectors use the same machined pins as do the sub D connectors. That has worked well for the last twenty plus years.
I can remove the panel in five minutes and reinstall it in less than ten minutes. Total number of electrical connectors and tubing on the panel is less than ten.
Happy Skies,
Old Bob
In a message dated 7/10/2012 12:43:09 A.M. Central Daylight Time, aaaron(at)tvp.com.au writes:
Quote: |
If I were to make my instrument panel (mainly steam guages) removable, what would be the best type of connectors to use from a reliability, noise and maintenance perspective. I need to think about power, sensors and radio/audio. I realise that this may introduce some unreliability into the system - just wondering if I were to do this, what are the best type of connectors to use.
Thanks - Allan |
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
james(at)etravel.org Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:26 am Post subject: instrument panel connectors |
|
|
On mine, the radios & GPS are on a separate tray, which gets left in place when the panel is removed. Â Toggle switches are on a separate permanently-installed sub-panel. Â Apart from that, there are the following types of connectors:Â
Engine instruments: 9-pin d-sub (all UMA instruments)
Stall warner light: Mate-n-lok
Annunciator panel: Mate-n-lok
Intercom: 9-pin d-sub
Turn co-ordinator: wire-lockable Amphenol connector (to suit t/c)
Pitot / static: quick-disconnect fittings. Â
Rev counter: quick-disconnect fitting supplied with it (UMA again)
Vacuum gauges: haven't thought about these yet!Â
I really like the mate-n-lok connectors and have used them throughout the plane for various connections. Â
FWIW.
James
On 10 July 2012 10:13, <BobsV35B(at)aol.com (BobsV35B(at)aol.com)> wrote:
[quote] Good Morning Allan,
Â
A little over twenty years ago I set up my Bonanza floating panel so as to make it easily removable. I had a lot of switches mounted on the panel so there were a lot of connections other than the usual stock connectors on the individual instruments.
Â
What I did was arrange to have just one static line and one pitot line going to the panel. The rest of that plumbing stayed with the removed panel. I used stock wrench removable B nut connectors for those two lines as well as all other plumbing. For all of the miscellaneous electrical items I installed a standard 60 pin CPC connector. Used about forty of the available spots. The CPC series of connectors use the same machined pins as do the sub D connectors. That has worked well for the last twenty plus years.
Â
I can remove the panel in five minutes and reinstall it in less than ten minutes. Total number of electrical connectors and tubing on the panel is less than ten.Â
Â
Happy Skies,
Â
Old Bob
Â
Â
In a message dated 7/10/2012 12:43:09 A.M. Central Daylight Time, aaaron(at)tvp.com.au (aaaron(at)tvp.com.au) writes:
Quote: |
If I were to make my instrument panel (mainly steam guages) removable, what would be the best type of connectors to use from a reliability, noise and maintenance perspective. I need to think about power, sensors and radio/audio. I realise that this may introduce some unreliability into the system - just wondering if I were to do this, what are the best type of connectors to use.
Thanks - Allan |
Quote: |
ist" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
|
[b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|