|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 11:10 am Post subject: Attaching "uninsulated ring terminals" to 4 awg wire... |
|
|
I soldered the 4 or 5 big wire terminals in my project and it all worked
very well per Bob's tutorial below. In particular, the stuffing of the
barrel with copper wedges was a key detail. Did mine with a 25 year
old Weller soldering gun.
Bill
On 8/11/2012 8:24 AM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote:
Quote: |
<nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com>
At 09:30 PM 8/10/2012, you wrote:
>
> <mburbidg(at)gmail.com>
>
> I'm using the "uninsulated ring terminals" for 4 awg wire from the
> contractors to my bus and alternator. Are the terminals sold by B&C
> meant to be crimped or soldered? If crimped where can I get a crimper
> big enough to handle 4 awg. B&C only sells ones that handle up to 10
> awg wire.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael-
Crimp tools for the larger terminals are
pretty pricey. Further, most airplanes will
need only a handful of large terminals. Consider
soldering un-insulated terminals and dressing
out with heat shrink. See:
http://tinyurl.com/9pbvky8
Bob . . .
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
raymondj(at)frontiernet.n Guest
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 2:18 pm Post subject: Attaching "uninsulated ring terminals" to 4 awg wire... |
|
|
Greetings,
I know crimp and then solder is frowned upon as unnecessary. I was
wondering if there was a problem with crimping with a whack-type, to
tighten up the strands in the terminal(instead of wedging) and then
soldering. Seems less fussy if you already have the beat-n-bash
crimper, or if you have several to do.
do not archive
Raymond Julian
Kettle River, MN.
"And you know that I could have me a million more friends,
and all I'd have to lose is my point of view." - John Prine
On 08/11/2012 07:29 AM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote:
Quote: |
<nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com>
At 06:05 AM 8/11/2012, you wrote:
>
> <email(at)jaredyates.com>
>
> I've got one of those wack-types that I'd like to get rid of. I wasn't
> happy with the results, but perhaps someone else coudl do better. I
> anyone is in the market for one, send me a note.
The problem with beat-n-bash crimpers is lack
of verification for having achieved a gas-tight
joint.
See:
http://tinyurl.com/8vk6sxc
http://tinyurl.com/93yweyd
Without vetting the marriage of wire-to-terminal-to-tool,
the easiest way to maximize copper in the wire grip is
to stuff wire-wedges into the matrix and then fill all
voids with free-flow of an electronic grade 63/37 solder.
Works good, lasts a long time.
Bob . . .
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|