|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JLuckey(at)pacbell.net Guest
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 9:03 am Post subject: Start Solenoid Orientation |
|
|
Group,
I’m preparing some electrical hardware for my RV7 & this question came up:
How should I orient the start solenoid, terminals up or down? I’m curious how G loading will affect the plunger.
I’m planning to use this solenoid http://www.autopartswarehouse.com/sku/Standard/Starter_Solenoid/SISS581.html (a generic automotive type) because it is inexpensive & should be easily found in the future.
In the picture at the above link, the solenoid appears “terminals down”. Is that how it should be mounted in the airframe? In that orientation, any positive G loading will try to keep the contacts apart or open which is what I want. (don’t want starter to inadvertently engage at the bottom of a hard pull).
I think that the return spring in this device is pretty strong therefore it would take more than 6 Gs to get it to move but I thought I would pose the question to the group.
Also, this solenoid has an “I” terminal which gets B+ when the solenoid is energized. (I think it is used to bypass an ignition ballast resistor in older cars) Does anyone have a schematic of the wiring inside this device? I’m curious how this “I” terminal is wired internally. ( I googled for about 20 minutes but could not find any info on this, which I though was odd )
So, I’m looking specifically for feedback on the following 2 questions:
- applicability of this device for cranking a Lycoming
- mounting orientation
- internal schematic
TIA,
Jeff Luckey
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:31 pm Post subject: Start Solenoid Orientation |
|
|
At 12:02 PM 9/23/2012, you wrote:
Group,
I'm preparing some electrical hardware for my RV7 & this question came up:
How should I orient the start solenoid, terminals up or down? I'm
curious how G loading will affect the plunger.
I'm planning to use this solenoid
http://www.autopartswarehouse.com/sku/Standard/Starter_Solenoid/SISS581.html
(a generic automotive type) because it is inexpensive & should be
easily found in the future.
In the picture at the above link, the solenoid appears "terminals
down". Is that how it should be mounted in the airframe? In that
orientation, any positive G loading will try to keep the contacts
apart or open which is what I want. (don't want starter to
inadvertently engage at the bottom of a hard pull).
I think that the return spring in this device is pretty strong
therefore it would take more than 6 Gs to get it to move but I
thought I would pose the question to the group.
Exactly. The g-load closing of starter contactors
is one of those hanagar myths that has been around
for a very long time . . . and repeated often enough
it morphs into fact.
That contactor mounted on the firewall orients the
the terminals forward. A study of these pieces and
parts http://tinyurl.com/96wy5mq shows that the
contact bar is pushed against the insulated lid
which retains the terminals. G-forces tending to
close the contacts in this orientation would be
achieved only if you flew into a mountainside.
When oriented on a horizontal surface, you'd have
to be in a wing-stripping push-over to close
the contacts.
I was working the B&C booth at OSH when one of the
air-show famous showed up to buy a new starter and
a starter contactor. After completing a performance
it was discovered that his starter ring gear was
trashed and the pinion on the starter damaged. The
starter contactor was "stuck shut" which common
wisdom of excited moment suggest was victim of
daring-do g-loads.
I didn't get to see the as-installed carcasses
nor were we asked to do autopsies on the damaged
parts.
After some reflection in following months I
concluded that he most likely suffered a stuck
contactor at engine start up. But given the cockpit
noise of these hi-performance machines and attention
to upcoming demands on pilotage, the event went
unnoticed. He probably flew his routine with a
starter engaged and running.
Also, this solenoid has an "I" terminal which gets B+ when the
solenoid is energized. (I think it is used to bypass an ignition
ballast resistor in older cars) Does anyone have a schematic of the
wiring inside this device? I'm curious how this "I" terminal is
wired internally. ( I googled for about 20 minutes but could not
find any info on this, which I though was odd )
You're correct. This feature isn't used in cars
with electronic ignition but would still be useful
on a '57 Chevy. Few cognizant enthusiasts today
are even aware of this feature or its significance.
There are two popular form factors for this contactor.
http://tinyurl.com/8my46tv
There's a number of I-terminal references in this
document
http://tinyurl.com/9looejm
So, I'm looking specifically for feedback on the following 2 questions:
applicability of this device for cranking a Lycoming
Works good, lasts a long time
mounting orientation
Doesn't really matter much but you'd have to
go out of your way to mount it such that
flight g-loads tended to close contacts. This
is unlike popular starter contactors of
yesteryear
http://tinyurl.com/8fwygp4
which featured large area, low pressure contacts
and massive solenoid armatures. Even in the
"continuous duty" versions were not well suited
to high-inrush duty of spinning up cranking motors.
That's the best we had in 1960 but have not been
seen in that service for many decades. But even
these parts are exceedingly unlike to get closed
under g-loads of flight. Now, there WAS a good
reason for mounting them upside down on the firewall
but that was for moisture reasons . . . that's
another story of a CFD and hat-dance carried out
at the Cessna Single Engine facility about 1980.
internal schematic
See figure 11-21 in the 'Connection. Functionally
accurate. The "I" terminal in modern incarnations
of a starter contactor is bridged in one stroke with
the main terminals of the device. In this
picture http://tinyurl.com/96wy5mq the "thin and
light moving contacts" are propped up on a spring
strut at right angles to the main current pathway.
The end of this strut contacts the "I" terminal
simultaneously with closure of the main terminals.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JLuckey(at)pacbell.net Guest
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 1:54 pm Post subject: Start Solenoid Orientation |
|
|
Thanks Bob for your usual thorough mini-dissertation (I don't know how you
find the time to deliver such thoughtful answers to the group but it is much
appreciated! - If you are ever in Southern California, the cervezas are on
me)
--
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|