![Matronics Email Lists Forum Index](templates/Matronics/images/logo_phpBB.gif) |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
cpayne(at)joimail.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:38 pm Post subject: AOPA Article |
|
|
Just got my AOPA mag. It has a fly-off between Rich Romaine's 285HP CJ and a T-34 with an IO-550. Of course the CJ lost the "fly-off" and was trashed by the author for it's looks and systems. The guy incorrectly stated that the front seat didn't adjust as well. Too bad they didn't fly a little 1-V-1, but that's not the kind of flying AOPA writers do.
BTW, Yak-52's were dumped into the same trash bin as the CJ-6. That should piss off somebody.
Craig Payne
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/Matronics/images/spacer.gif) |
pfstelwagon(at)earthlink. Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 2:24 pm Post subject: AOPA article |
|
|
I don't remember a CJ ever being grounded for a wing center section failure. I guess Beech (or whatever they are now called) needs all the help they can get.
Frank
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/Matronics/images/spacer.gif) |
jonboede(at)hotmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 3:29 pm Post subject: AOPA Article |
|
|
Good.� The T-34 can continue to act as a "Shell No-Pest Strip" for people not bright enough to buy a CJ or Yak.�
"Why yes, yes indeed, 'real' pilots fly the T-34!� Why don't you join them over there and help them iron their scarves?"� Nothing to see here.� Move along.
Quote: | Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:36:06 -0400
From: cpayne(at)joimail.com
To: yak-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: AOPA Article
--> Yak-List message posted by: Cpayne <cpayne(at)joimail.com>
Just got my AOPA mag. It has a fly-off between Rich Romaine's 285HP CJ and a T-34 with an IO-550. Of course the CJ lost the "fly-off" and was trashed by the author for it's looks and systems. The guy incorrectly stated that the front seat didn't adjust as well. Too bad they didn't fly a little 1-V-1, but that's not the kind of flying AOPA writers do.
BTW, Yak-52's were dumped into the same trash bin as the CJ-6. That should piss off somebody.
Craig Payne
|
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/Matronics/images/spacer.gif) |
firedog(at)visi.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 3:48 pm Post subject: AOPA Article |
|
|
Well stated…and I love the “nothing to see here…Move along”…least we forget the common attraction to bright shiny things…mine is not bright and the shiny is only if I don’t wipe her down after a hop.
From: owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jon Boede
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 6:27 PM
To: yak-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: RE: AOPA Article
Good. The T-34 can continue to act as a "Shell No-Pest Strip" for people not bright enough to buy a CJ or Yak.
"Why yes, yes indeed, 'real' pilots fly the T-34! Why don't you join them over there and help them iron their scarves?" Nothing to see here. Move along.
> To: yak-list(at)matronics.com
> Subject: AOPA Article
>
> --> Yak-List message posted by: Cpayne <cpayne(at)joimail.com>
>
> Just got my AOPA mag. It has a fly-off between Rich Romaine's 285HP CJ and a T-34 with an IO-550. Of course the CJ lost the "fly-off" and was trashed by the author for it's looks and systems. The guy incorrectly stated that the front seat didn't adjust as well. Too bad they didn't fly a little 1-V-1, but that's not the kind of flying AOPA writers do.
>
> BTW, Yak-52's were dumped into the same trash bin as the CJ-6. That should piss off somebody.
>
> Craig Payne
Quote: | http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List | 0123456789
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/Matronics/images/spacer.gif) |
onthegosa(at)aol.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 3:55 pm Post subject: AOPA Article |
|
|
Ok, Let's take a stock T 34 with it it's 225 horse engine versa a stock CJ6A with it's 285 hp engine. I'll take on a 300 horse T-34 with my 14 P powered CJ any day of the week and I wonder why they chose 10,000 feet for the comparison I much rather have had 6000
Scott Andrews602-705-4413
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 21, 2013, at 4:46 PM, "Dr. Robert Schroeder" <firedog(at)visi.com (firedog(at)visi.com)> wrote:
[quote] v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} <![endif]-->
Well stated…and I love the “nothing to see here…Move along”…least we forget the common attraction to bright shiny things…mine is not bright and the shiny is only if I don’t wipe her down after a hop.
From: owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com) [mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com)] On Behalf Of Jon Boede
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 6:27 PM
To: yak-list(at)matronics.com (yak-list(at)matronics.com)
Subject: RE: AOPA Article
Good. The T-34 can continue to act as a "Shell No-Pest Strip" for people not bright enough to buy a CJ or Yak.
"Why yes, yes indeed, 'real' pilots fly the T-34! Why don't you join them over there and help them iron their scarves?" Nothing to see here. Move along.
> To: yak-list(at)matronics.com (yak-list(at)matronics.com)
> Subject: AOPA Article
>
> --> Yak-List message posted by: Cpayne <cpayne(at)joimail.com (cpayne(at)joimail.com)>
>
> Just got my AOPA mag. It has a fly-off between Rich Romaine's 285HP CJ and a T-34 with an IO-550. Of course the CJ lost the "fly-off" and was trashed by the author for it's looks and systems. The guy incorrectly stated that the front seat didn't adjust as well. Too bad they didn't fly a little 1-V-1, but that's not the kind of flying AOPA writers do.
>
> BTW, Yak-52's were dumped into the same trash bin as the CJ-6. That should piss off somebody.
>
> Craig Payne
012
3
[b]
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/Matronics/images/spacer.gif) |
viperdoc(at)mindspring.co Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 4:34 pm Post subject: AOPA Article |
|
|
Have not read the article yet. Would love to see the 5 G T-34 hang with me doing a little BFM with the 52. Put the 50 in the ring and I'll take it in less than one turn. I'll be glad to play with them at 10,000 ft too.
Doc
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 21, 2013, at 6:53 PM, Scott <onthegosa(at)aol.com (onthegosa(at)aol.com)> wrote:
[quote]Ok, Let's take a stock T 34 with it it's 225 horse engine versa a stock CJ6A with it's 285 hp engine. I'll take on a 300 horse T-34 with my 14 P powered CJ any day of the week and I wonder why they chose 10,000 feet for the comparison I much rather have had 6000
Scott Andrews602-705-4413
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 21, 2013, at 4:46 PM, "Dr. Robert Schroeder" <firedog(at)visi.com (firedog(at)visi.com)> wrote:
Quote: | v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} <![endif]-->
Well stated…and I love the “nothing to see here…Move along”…least we forget the common attraction to bright shiny things…mine is not bright and the shiny is only if I don’t wipe her down after a hop.
From: owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com) [mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com)] On Behalf Of Jon Boede
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 6:27 PM
To: yak-list(at)matronics.com (yak-list(at)matronics.com)
Subject: RE: AOPA Article
Good. The T-34 can continue to act as a "Shell No-Pest Strip" for people not bright enough to buy a CJ or Yak.
"Why yes, yes indeed, 'real' pilots fly the T-34! Why don't you join them over there and help them iron their scarves?" Nothing to see here. Move along.
> To: yak-list(at)matronics.com (yak-list(at)matronics.com)
> Subject: AOPA Article
>
> --> Yak-List message posted by: Cpayne <cpayne(at)joimail.com (cpayne(at)joimail.com)>
>
> Just got my AOPA mag. It has a fly-off between Rich Romaine's 285HP CJ and a T-34 with an IO-550. Of course the CJ lost the "fly-off" and was trashed by the author for it's looks and systems. The guy incorrectly stated that the front seat didn't adjust as well. Too bad they didn't fly a little 1-V-1, but that's not the kind of flying AOPA writers do.
>
> BTW, Yak-52's were dumped into the same trash bin as the CJ-6. That should piss off somebody.
>
> Craig Payne
012
3
| 4
[b]
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/Matronics/images/spacer.gif) |
keithmckinley
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 434
|
Posted: Sun Jun 30, 2013 6:08 pm Post subject: Re: AOPA Article |
|
|
First of all, I didn't get the impression that the CJ was "trashed" in the article. True, an M-14 powered CJ with a 3 bladed prop would crush a t-34, also true 10K was not a good altitude for performance tests.
Last, Come on Doc!....a Yak 50 vs a T-34 with two guys who have actual ACM training is like fighting an F-4 with a an F-22
Bottom line, if you are enjoying your ride, who cares what some Putz at AOPA writes?
~Wiz
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/Matronics/images/spacer.gif) |
viperdoc(at)mindspring.co Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 30, 2013 9:05 pm Post subject: AOPA Article |
|
|
Roger that! Pin heads are pin heads.
Doc
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 30, 2013, at 9:08 PM, "keithmckinley" <cetopfed(at)gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: |
First of all, I didn't get the impression that the CJ was "trashed" in the article. True, an M-14 powered CJ with a 3 bladed prop would crush a t-34, also true 10K was not a good altitude for performance tests.
Last, Come on Doc!....a Yak 50 vs a T-34 with two guys who have actual ACM training is like fighting an F-4 with a an F-22 [Wink]
Bottom line, if you are enjoying your ride, who cares what some Putz at AOPA writes?
~Wiz
--------
Keith McKinley
700HS
X26 Sebastian, FL
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=403666#403666
|
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/Matronics/images/spacer.gif) |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|