|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ventura(at)brandeis.edu Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 2:53 pm Post subject: Navman Fuel Flow Meter |
|
|
This is a post I made on one of the canard lists a couple months ago. I
got no response
there, so I thought someone here might have some information. First a
little background.
A member of that canard list posted a Navman fuel flow meter for sale on
the list,
and a well respected member of that list condemned the use of that flow
meter in aircraft
because it uses a plastic housing in its flow transducer, and at least
one pilot was killed
when that housing failed, feeding large amounts of fuel to an inflight fire.
========================================================
First I want to thank Marc for his strong condemnation of the Navman
Fuel Flow Meter. (I started to say "vociferous condemnation" but I am
not sure I know what that means.) That enabled me to buy a used one
very inexpensively. I bought it primarily for automotive and motorcycle
fuel flow testing, and it may see limited aviation use in testing fuel
flow to large model airplane engines. (Some model airplane engines use
alcohol and nitro-methane fuels; do any of you know if the Navman sensor
will be damaged by those kinds of fuels?)
However, one of you got my attention by mentioning that the Navman
electronics can be used with other manufacturer's transducers, so at
least part of the Navman may eventually get into my LongEz. If it
happens, this is a long way off, but I have a few questions related to
that topic I would like to ask while this is all fresh in the collective
canard-aviators consciousness:
1. Most flow transducers use small "turbines". Since all the fuel
flows through the transducer, do these turbine sensors have a failure
mode that can block the fuel flow, for example if the turbine seizes, or
can enough fuel still get through for me to limp to an airport?
2. Which transducers would you recommend? Are there any metal housing
turbine type automotive transducers that you consider acceptable? The
one in my car works very well.
3. There is an extra calibration procedure in the Navman manual for use
with their sensor (pour a know amount of fuel through the transducer,
and tell the electronics what that was). I assume I would follow the
same procedure to calibrate any other transducer I hook up to it. Is
that correct, or is there anything else I would have to do?
4. What pins correspond to what function in the Navman connector? I
obviously need that information to hook up the Navman electronics to
someone else's transducer. I am sure I could figure that out with a
volt meter and a scope too, but is there any other modification necessary?
5. Is there anything else I have missed?
Thanks for your help. --Joel
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
holger-d(at)shadowbrush.c Guest
|
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 12:50 pm Post subject: Navman Fuel Flow Meter |
|
|
Hi Joel,
When searching for a metal housing transducer, have you looked at the 'Red Cube': http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/inpages/eift60.php ? Oh, the price went down $10! Anyway, it's what some of the RV crowd is using. If you go to http://www.vansairforce.com , there are lots of discussions around it in the forum. Here's a thread that discusses the best installation location: http://www.supercub.org/forum/showthread.php?34031-fuel-flow-sensor-installation . The technical documentation says no additional pressure drop with blocked rotor.
Buddy has the FlowScan 201A-6: http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/inpages/mglfuelflowsensor.php installed and is happy with it. When I asked about a blocked rotor he said there is an increased pressure drop, but minimal and not affecting operations, at least on the paper.
Holger
On 7/31/13 3:52 PM, Joel Ventura wrote:
[quote]--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Joel Ventura <ventura(at)brandeis.edu> (ventura(at)brandeis.edu)
This is a post I made on one of the canard lists a couple months ago. I got no response
there, so I thought someone here might have some information. First a little background.
A member of that canard list posted a Navman fuel flow meter for sale on the list,
and a well respected member of that list condemned the use of that flow meter in aircraft
because it uses a plastic housing in its flow transducer, and at least one pilot was killed
when that housing failed, feeding large amounts of fuel to an inflight fire.
========================================================
First I want to thank Marc for his strong condemnation of the Navman
Fuel Flow Meter. ..
[b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ceengland7(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:32 pm Post subject: Navman Fuel Flow Meter |
|
|
I certainly wouldn't run a plastic transducer on the pressurized side on a fuel injected engine, but not all things plastic are always bad (as you apparently know, if you're posting on the canard list). The plastic transducers are typically used in both off-road vehicles and boats. They seem to survive in marine environments, which are just as hostile as a/c, and almost as dangerous. Running one on the cool side of the firewall on a carb'd engine is worth looking at. There are several other brands of marine fuel flow meters that have seen successful use in a/c. (I've been running a Lowrance model in an RV-4 for years.)
Charlie
On 08/06/2013 03:50 PM, Holger Selover-Stephan wrote:
[quote] Hi Joel,
When searching for a metal housing transducer, have you looked at the 'Red Cube': http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/inpages/eift60.php ? Oh, the price went down $10! Anyway, it's what some of the RV crowd is using. If you go to http://www.vansairforce.com , there are lots of discussions around it in the forum. Here's a thread that discusses the best installation location: http://www.supercub.org/forum/showthread.php?34031-fuel-flow-sensor-installation . The technical documentation says no additional pressure drop with blocked rotor.
Buddy has the FlowScan 201A-6: http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/inpages/mglfuelflowsensor.php installed and is happy with it. When I asked about a blocked rotor he said there is an increased pressure drop, but minimal and not affecting operations, at least on the paper.
Holger
On 7/31/13 3:52 PM, Joel Ventura wrote:
Quote: | --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Joel Ventura <ventura(at)brandeis.edu> (ventura(at)brandeis.edu)
This is a post I made on one of the canard lists a couple months ago. I got no response
there, so I thought someone here might have some information. First a little background.
A member of that canard list posted a Navman fuel flow meter for sale on the list,
and a well respected member of that list condemned the use of that flow meter in aircraft
because it uses a plastic housing in its flow transducer, and at least one pilot was killed
when that housing failed, feeding large amounts of fuel to an inflight fire.
========================================================
First I want to thank Marc for his strong condemnation of the Navman
Fuel Flow Meter. ..
|
[b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kellym
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1705 Location: Sun Lakes AZ
|
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 4:43 pm Post subject: Navman Fuel Flow Meter |
|
|
The transducer he suggested is not "plastic". It probably does have a
plastic turbine wheel inside, but it is the certified fuel flow
transducer from Electronics International with all metal case.
On 8/6/2013 2:31 PM, Charlie England wrote:
Quote: | I certainly wouldn't run a plastic transducer on the pressurized side
on a fuel injected engine, but not all things plastic are always bad
(as you apparently know, if you're posting on the canard list). The
plastic transducers are typically used in both off-road vehicles and
boats. They seem to survive in marine environments, which are just as
hostile as a/c, and almost as dangerous. Running one on the cool side
of the firewall on a carb'd engine is worth looking at. There are
several other brands of marine fuel flow meters that have seen
successful use in a/c. (I've been running a Lowrance model in an RV-4
for years.)
Charlie
On 08/06/2013 03:50 PM, Holger Selover-Stephan wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> When searching for a metal housing transducer, have you looked at the
> 'Red Cube': http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/inpages/eift60.php
> ? Oh, the price went down $10! Anyway, it's what some of the RV crowd
> is using. If you go to http://www.vansairforce.com , there are lots
> of discussions around it in the forum. Here's a thread that discusses
> the best installation location:
> http://www.supercub.org/forum/showthread.php?34031-fuel-flow-sensor-installation
> . The technical documentation says no additional pressure drop with
> blocked rotor.
>
> Buddy has the FlowScan 201A-6:
> http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/inpages/mglfuelflowsensor.php
> installed and is happy with it. When I asked about a blocked rotor he
> said there is an increased pressure drop, but minimal and not
> affecting operations, at least on the paper.
>
> Holger
> On 7/31/13 3:52 PM, Joel Ventura wrote:
>>
>> <ventura(at)brandeis.edu>
>>
>> This is a post I made on one of the canard lists a couple months
>> ago. I got no response
>> there, so I thought someone here might have some information. First
>> a little background.
>> A member of that canard list posted a Navman fuel flow meter for
>> sale on the list,
>> and a well respected member of that list condemned the use of that
>> flow meter in aircraft
>> because it uses a plastic housing in its flow transducer, and at
>> least one pilot was killed
>> when that housing failed, feeding large amounts of fuel to an
>> inflight fire.
>>
>> ========================================================
>>
>> First I want to thank Marc for his strong condemnation of the Navman
>> Fuel Flow Meter. ..
>
*
*
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Kelly McMullen
A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor # 5286
KCHD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
n520tx(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 5:07 pm Post subject: Navman Fuel Flow Meter |
|
|
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 17:41 -0700, Kelly McMullen wrote:
Quote: |
<kellym(at)aviating.com>
The transducer he suggested is not "plastic".
|
I think Charlie was referring to the OP discussing the "Navman Fuel Flow
Meter" ... which is certainly plastic. I've been running one in my RV7a
for 10 yrs (carbureted O-360) without incident. I had to re-read a few
posts to understand that myself, since I agree that the red cube is
certainly not plastic, and is what I'm using in my 10.
--Ron
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tim2542(at)sbcglobal.net Guest
|
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 5:53 pm Post subject: Navman Fuel Flow Meter |
|
|
This may be of interest to those running a Navman flow sensor.
No horse in this race, but its worth reading I think.
http://www.cozybuilders.org/Glenn_Saunders/Complete_Report.pdf
Tim
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 6, 2013, at 6:07 PM, Ron Walker <n520tx(at)gmail.com (n520tx(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
[quote]--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Ron Walker <n520tx(at)gmail.com (n520tx(at)gmail.com)>
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 17:41 -0700, Kelly McMullen wrote:
Quote: | --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Kelly McMullen
<kellym(at)aviating.com (kellym(at)aviating.com)>
The transducer he suggested is not "plastic".
|
I think Charlie was referring to the OP discussing the "Navman Fuel Flow
Meter" ... which is certainly plastic. I've been running one in my RV7a
for 10 yrs (carbureted O-360) without incident. I had to re-read a few
posts to understand that myself, since I agree that the red cube is
certainly not plastic, and is what I'm using in my 10.
--Ron
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-Li==================================================http://w====================================================
[b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
n520tx(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:47 am Post subject: Navman Fuel Flow Meter |
|
|
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 18:52 -0700, Tim Andres wrote:
Interesting report -- I'm always pleased with the detail and content
that is contained within Canadian TSB reports. That said, I still have
questions about the installation and failure mode:
- was a cause of the fire identified ?
- was it the crash that caused the fracture of the meter intake ?
- was the installation of this sensor up or downstream of the fuel
pump ?
It's not specifically called out, but it leaves you to assume that it
was indeed installed within the engine compartment. Not a good idea for
anything made of plastic materials due to the heat, let alone the
vibration.
The fact that manufacturer of the pump specifies "not for use in
aircraft" is no surprise - no one wants the potential liability. I
blindly assumed that since I purchased mine from Spruce that it was OK
to use. With one look at it, even I figured out that it shouldn't go in
the heat of the engine area -- I mounted mine close to the fuel tank,
away from heat and vibration. Heck, even the engine and flight control
push/pull cables that I received from Vans for my RV10 have large tags
on them saying "Not for Aircraft use".
The timing of this topic, though, hits close to home. I already have in
hand a replacement fuel flow sensor from MGL that I am in process of
installing in my 7a in place of this Navman. This thread has me
re-thinking about my intent to sell this device to another aviator.
--Ron
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tim2542(at)sbcglobal.net Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:04 am Post subject: Navman Fuel Flow Meter |
|
|
Ron I cant definitively answer those questions for you. This came up recently on canard aviators when one popped up for sale and was also discussed much at the time of the accident.
It my understanding the fitting cracked, broke, leaked, and ignited while airborne on first flight after a different engine (type) was installed.
Marc Zeitlen can give you a lot more details if you need them, and he may have been involved in the investigation, I don't recall now, but Im pretty sure I can say he will advise you park the plane until its removed.
Tim
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 7, 2013, at 6:46 AM, Ron Walker <n520tx(at)gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: |
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 18:52 -0700, Tim Andres wrote:
> This may be of interest to those running a Navman flow sensor. No
> horse in this race, but its worth reading I think.
> http://www.cozybuilders.org/Glenn_Saunders/Complete_Report.pdf Tim
Interesting report -- I'm always pleased with the detail and content
that is contained within Canadian TSB reports. That said, I still have
questions about the installation and failure mode:
- was a cause of the fire identified ?
- was it the crash that caused the fracture of the meter intake ?
- was the installation of this sensor up or downstream of the fuel
pump ?
It's not specifically called out, but it leaves you to assume that it
was indeed installed within the engine compartment. Not a good idea for
anything made of plastic materials due to the heat, let alone the
vibration.
The fact that manufacturer of the pump specifies "not for use in
aircraft" is no surprise - no one wants the potential liability. I
blindly assumed that since I purchased mine from Spruce that it was OK
to use. With one look at it, even I figured out that it shouldn't go in
the heat of the engine area -- I mounted mine close to the fuel tank,
away from heat and vibration. Heck, even the engine and flight control
push/pull cables that I received from Vans for my RV10 have large tags
on them saying "Not for Aircraft use".
The timing of this topic, though, hits close to home. I already have in
hand a replacement fuel flow sensor from MGL that I am in process of
installing in my 7a in place of this Navman. This thread has me
re-thinking about my intent to sell this device to another aviator.
--Ron
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
bobnoffs
Joined: 04 Jul 2012 Posts: 132 Location: northern wi.
|
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:42 am Post subject: Navman Fuel Flow Meter |
|
|
there are many fuel flo systems out there that use the ''red cube''. the cube is metal and i have a ''flight data computer'' that uses the red cube. i little tweaking and it is dead on. my experience with this computer has been all positive.
bob noffs
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Tim Andres <tim2542(at)sbcglobal.net (tim2542(at)sbcglobal.net)> wrote:
[quote] --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Tim Andres <tim2542(at)sbcglobal.net (tim2542(at)sbcglobal.net)>
Ron I cant definitively answer those questions for you. This came up recently on canard aviators when one popped up for sale and was also discussed much at the time of the accident.
It my understanding the fitting cracked, broke, leaked, and ignited while airborne on first flight after a different engine (type) was installed.
Marc Zeitlen can give you a lot more details if you need them, and he may have been involved in the investigation, I don't recall now, but Im pretty sure I can say he will advise you park the plane until its removed.
Tim
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 7, 2013, at 6:46 AM, Ron Walker <n520tx(at)gmail.com (n520tx(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
> --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Ron Walker <n520tx(at)gmail.com (n520tx(at)gmail.com)>
>
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 18:52 -0700, Tim Andres wrote:
>> This may be of interest to those running a Navman flow sensor. No
>> horse in this race, but its worth reading I think.
>> http://www.cozybuilders.org/Glenn_Saunders/Complete_Report.pdf Tim
>
> Interesting report -- I'm always pleased with the detail and content
> that is contained within Canadian TSB reports. That said, I still have
> questions about the installation and failure mode:
>
> - was a cause of the fire identified ?
> - was it the crash that caused the fracture of the meter intake ?
> - was the installation of this sensor up or downstream of the fuel
> pump ?
>
> It's not specifically called out, but it leaves you to assume that it
> was indeed installed within the engine compartment. Not a good idea for
> anything made of plastic materials due to the heat, let alone the
> vibration.
>
> The fact that manufacturer of the pump specifies "not for use in
> aircraft" is no surprise - no one wants the potential liability. I
> blindly assumed that since I purchased mine from Spruce that it was OK
> to use. With one look at it, even I figured out that it shouldn't go in
> the heat of the engine area -- I mounted mine close to the fuel tank,
> away from heat and vibration. Heck, even the engine and flight control
> push/pull cables that I received from Vans for my RV10 have large tags
> on them saying "Not for Aircraft use".
>
> The timing of this topic, though, hits close to home. I already have in
> hand a replacement fuel flow sensor from MGL that I am in process of
> installing in my 7a in place of this Navman. This thread has me
> re-thinking about my intent to sell this device to another aviator.
>
> --Ron
>
>
>
>
>
===========
-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
===========
http://forums.matronics.com
===========
le, List Admin.
="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===========
[b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|