|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
marinegunner(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:41 pm Post subject: CH600 brake lines & Cont A65 prop |
|
|
I have a CH 600 that will be ready for the DAR withing 6-8 weeks. I have a Cont. A65 on the airplane. Would like to move the empty CG forward just a tiny bit. Right now, with two 200 +/- people and low fuel (4 gallons or so), the CG is at or behind the aft CG. I figure that a metal prop would do the trick. I have a wooden prop now. Battery is already as far forward as I can get it. Nothing else that I add will make much difference. For example, small panel mounted radio will hardly move the empty CG. Anyone know someone with a metal prop for a Cont. A-65?
Brake lines are done in plastic. I really do not like the plastic showing outside the wheel pants. Thinking of making the last foot or two out of metal tubing. Any ideas? Successful applications would be nice.
Thanks for your help.
--
Semper Fi,
Steven R. Hulland
CH 600, Amado, AZ
This and all other incoming/outgoing email, attachments and replies scanned prior to opening/sending and uses an external firewall to help insure virus free email and attachments.
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
daveaustin2(at)can.rogers Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 3:00 am Post subject: CH600 brake lines & Cont A65 prop |
|
|
Steve,
Put a helium balloon in the tail..
Do not archive
Dave Austin 601HDS - 912, Spitfire Mk VIII
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
marinegunner(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:59 am Post subject: CH600 brake lines & Cont A65 prop |
|
|
Dave,
Helium ballon might do the trick! But, how about building in a ballon with an outside valve. Then I can add/delete as required.
Do not Archive--
Semper Fi,
Steven R. Hulland
CH 701, Amado, AZ
This and all other incoming/outgoing email, attachments and replies scanned prior to opening/sending and uses an external firewall to help insure virus free email and attachments.
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
planejim(at)bellsouth.net Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:06 am Post subject: CH600 brake lines & Cont A65 prop |
|
|
Steve,
I have a 601HD that tends to run to the aft CG limit with two 200 pounders in the seats and minimum fuel ( 3 Gal ). I have only a 16 Gal main tank forward of the inst. panel. When I first started construction I asked Chris H. where the CG would fall with the Rotax 912UL. He said keep all the weight forward that I could during construction. I did but still have to watch the aft limit. I still have plenty of elevator on landing at the aft limit. It would have been nice if ZAC had made the engine about 1 1/2" longer.
As for your situation, you don't want to carry dead weight around if you can avoid it, and I assume you don't want to lengthen your engine mount and cowling so if you have nothing else of substantial weight to move forward going to a metal prop may be your easiest answer. The other temporary answer is add just enough lead ( that dreaded dead weight ) to the engine mount until you can get a metal prop. Depends on your DAR ,but he/she may require you to re-weigh the aircraft if you don't have all this solved before he/she gets there. I have a friend who had to add 64 pounds of lead to a forward bulkhead of his Loehle 5151 to get the CG in limits. This much dead weight on an airplane that only weighs 500+ pounds! This was just a poor design thing because many 5151 builders have added much dead weight. If the metal prop doesn't do the complete job you may still have to add a little lead forward. Sorry I don't know anyone who has a metal prop for the 65HP Cont. Good luck on this one.
As for plastic brake lines, I have 515 hours, 9 1/2 years on my plastic lines with no problems. Only connections are at brake cyl. at the wheels and the rudder pedals. No connections, no leaks. KISS! I do have a piece of rubber hose on outside of plastic line where they go into the wheel fairings to prevent chaffing. Works fine. Up under the wing no one sees the brake lines anyway!
Have a safe first flight.
Jim Hoak 601HD - 515 hrs
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
marinegunner(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 1:58 pm Post subject: CH600 brake lines & Cont A65 prop |
|
|
Jim Hoak,
Thanks for the nice answer. My 600 has a Gross Weight of 1,200lb. Empty weight of 605. When empty the Aft CG is 23.37% of MAC. All calculations assume crew weight of 215 per person, 48 lb. baggage, 6lb fuel when empty, 96lb fuel when full. With one person and empty fuel Aft CG is 30.99% of MAC; Full fuel with one person CG is 26.29% of MAC; Full fuel & two people, Aft CG is 29.22% of MAC; Two people and no fuel, Aft CG is 29.22% of MAC.
Using 30% of MAC as the maximum acceptable AFT CG, One person with the airplane empty shows the airplane out of CG aft. Not a problem because I should never get empty while flying and the absolute max CG aft is 31.5% of MAC. The situation with two people and being very low on fuel is the one I would like to move forward a bit - hence a metal prop might do the trick. I estimate that a metal prop weighing 12 pounds more than the existing wooden one will put the empty CG somewhere near 21% of MAC - well within the min. acceptable of 18% of MAC. Once I know the weight of a metal prop, I can see if this might work - although it can easily move the Aft CG to a bit less than 18% of MAC. If it does, then that solution will not work.
One thing that is nice is my Excel Spreadsheet for the CG. I can plug in numbers anywhere and find out what happens to the CG. For example, if I add a small panel radio, it will change CG and I can figure out by how much.
As with your friend, I could add a bit of lead to the engine frame. I doubt if it would need more than a few pounds and might be the best solution.
I really like your idea concerning rubber or some other material over the brake lines where they come through the wheel pants to prevent chafing. I may simply do someting like that and as you say, KISS.
Anyway, gonna get this stuff done along with a few other minor items and should be ready for DAR in August. That is the goal.
Thanks for your input, it was helpful.
--
Semper Fi,
Steven R. Hulland
CH 600, Amado, AZ
This and all other incoming/outgoing email, attachments and replies scanned prior to opening/sending and uses an external firewall to help insure virus free email and attachments.
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
noelloveys(at)yahoo.ca Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:58 pm Post subject: CH600 brake lines & Cont A65 prop |
|
|
Increasing the mass of the prop by 12 Lb. is going to increase the gyroscopic forces on the end of the crank quite a bit. It may also have a considerable effect on how the plane handles in turns, climbs and descents. I think your idea of weighting the engine mount is the better idea.
One more answer may be to have a spacer/weight installed over the hub of the prop At a distance of a couple of inches from the centre of rotation the gyroscopic forces won't be too large and the weight will actually be in front of the prop. Of course the weight will have to be dynamically balanced
Noel [quote]
--
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|