Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Comm Antenna

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV10-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cooprv7(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 1:33 pm    Post subject: Comm Antenna Reply with quote

I have been using a simple bent whip antenna on the bottom of my RV-10 for 7 years, but the signal has been getting weaker and I'm looking at upgrading. I looked in the archives but seemed to miss a discussion that I'm sure has been made, but I was wondering how much better antennas like COMANT's CI-122 are over the significantly cheaper bent whip? I'm using the low drag antenna on the cabin roof for COMM 2 and it works great.

Thanks,
Marcus


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 3:10 pm    Post subject: Comm Antenna Reply with quote

On 10/15/2013 5:28 PM, Marcus Cooper wrote:
Quote:


I have been using a simple bent whip antenna on the bottom of my RV-10 for 7 years, but the signal has been getting weaker and I'm looking at upgrading.
The bent whip antennas don't get 'weaker' ..... unless they're filthy.

I think something is deteriorating .... most likely a kink or bend in
the coax to the antenna or the connection at the antenna. Putting an
expensive antenna on the bad coax won't improve things much.
Linn

Quote:
I looked in the archives but seemed to miss a discussion that I'm sure has been made, but I was wondering how much better antennas like COMANT's CI-122 are over the significantly cheaper bent whip? I'm using the low drag antenna on the cabin roof for COMM 2 and it works great.
It's a lot of work but you might swap antennas to see what's up.

Linn
Quote:

Thanks,
Marcus

-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
Bob Turner



Joined: 03 Jan 2009
Posts: 885
Location: Castro Valley, CA

PostPosted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 3:17 pm    Post subject: Re: Comm Antenna Reply with quote

Getting weaker? Antennas don't wear out in 7 years. Is it relatively clean? I would look under the antenna for oxidation or corrosion.

- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List

_________________
Bob Turner
RV-10 QB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
aerosport1



Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 231

PostPosted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 3:44 pm    Post subject: Comm Antenna Reply with quote

Lynn
Have you had the com checked to see if it is ok. I had an issue with my 430
Nav portion. Single was getting weaker
And weaker. Changed antennas checked everything spent 6 months chasing this and it turned out to be the
430. The sad thing it was still in warranty when it started but by the time
I found it, it was out by 3 months Garmin still charged me 1000.00 to repair.

Geoff Combs

Sent from my iPhone
Geoff Combs
Aerosport Modeling

On Oct 15, 2013, at 7:02 PM, Linn Walters <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com> wrote:

Quote:


On 10/15/2013 5:28 PM, Marcus Cooper wrote:
>
>
> I have been using a simple bent whip antenna on the bottom of my RV-10 for 7 years, but the signal has been getting weaker and I'm looking at upgrading.
The bent whip antennas don't get 'weaker' ..... unless they're filthy. I think something is deteriorating .... most likely a kink or bend in the coax to the antenna or the connection at the antenna. Putting an expensive antenna on the bad coax won't improve things much.
Linn

> I looked in the archives but seemed to miss a discussion that I'm sure has been made, but I was wondering how much better antennas like COMANT's CI-122 are over the significantly cheaper bent whip? I'm using the low drag antenna on the cabin roof for COMM 2 and it works great.
It's a lot of work but you might swap antennas to see what's up.
Linn
>
> Thanks,
> Marcus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com








- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List

_________________
Geoff Combs
RV-10 QB N829GW
Flying 500 hrs
40033
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cooprv7(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 6:36 am    Post subject: Comm Antenna Reply with quote

Thanks for all of the responses, pretty consistent answers so I'll check out the connections. I've been doing some touch up work in preparation for possibly putting the airplane on the market as 4 seats just isn't enough anymore and it seemed like a good idea to upgrade the antenna if it would make a difference, but it sounds like it really wouldn't. Hate the idea of ever letting the machine go, but the mission seems to be changing a bit Sad

Thanks,
Marcus
do not archive
--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 10/15/13, Bob Turner <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu> wrote:

Subject: Re: Comm Antenna
To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com
Date: Tuesday, October 15, 2013, 7:17 PM


"Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>

Getting weaker? Antennas don't wear out in 7 years. Is it
relatively clean? I would look under the antenna for
oxidation or corrosion.

--------
Bob Turner
RV-10 QB




Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=410654#410654







Forum -
   - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
List Contribution Web Site -
              -Matt
Dralle, List Admin.


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV10-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group