Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Kitfox handling problems Wh wiat!

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Aerobatics(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:12 am    Post subject: Kitfox handling problems Wh wiat! Reply with quote

In a message dated 3/11/2006 11:43:31 A.M. Central Standard Time,
bmwebb(at)cox.net writes:



Great ideas. Especially nice to know that many of us have the same issues,
and we all can improve the planes.

I have to agree with all that's been said on this topic. It's well known
that an aft CG will make the elevator sensitive, and a forward CG makes it
mushy. I may go ahead and put my battery in the tail.

I read a study somewhere a long time ago that even a small gap in a control
surface not designed to have one, will reduce the surface effectiveness by
as much as 30%. It also pointed out that gaps did not contribute appreciably
to flutter issues (this was the point of the test, to find flutter causes),
but did greatly increase the authority of the control.

Bradley
That's a drastic change! the ratio of nose to tail weight can be as high as
6 to one or more. Adding a 10 lbs battery in tail could be the same as 60
in nose..... you could make the plane tail heavy a very bad thing..........
calculate first!


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
Graeme Toft



Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 123

PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 1:22 pm    Post subject: Kitfox handling problems Wh wiat! Reply with quote

Just on the subject of gaps between control surfaces such as verticle
stabilisers and rudders, Colin Drury (is on the list) has a great solution
for this problem. He could probably be convinced to put some photos up on
Sportflight to show the detail.

Cheers
Graeme
---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bmwebb(at)cox.net
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 5:23 am    Post subject: Kitfox handling problems Wh wiat! Reply with quote

Nah, I'll just go ahead and do it! The math takes too much time away from
flying...

Bradley
<snip>
Quote:
>> I may go ahead and put my battery in the tail.

Bradley
<snip>

That's a drastic change! the ratio of nose to tail weight can be as high
as
6 to one or more. Adding a 10 lbs battery in tail could be the same as 60
in nose..... you could make the plane tail heavy a very bad
thing..........
calculate first!


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group