Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Initial Zenith Response

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
lwinger



Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 229
Location: Tustin, CA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:01 am    Post subject: Initial Zenith Response Reply with quote

This just posted on the Zenith site:

NTSB Issues Safety Recommendation to FAA

April 15, 2009:

NTSB Safety Recommendation to FAA: http://www.ntsb.gov/recs/letters/2009/A09_30_37.pdf

Zenith Aircraft first became aware of the above NTSB Safety Recommendation Memo on April 14, 2009, at the same time the NTSB issued its press release to the public.

We continue to believe wing flutter will not occur if the control cables are adjusted properly. Nonetheless, we are carefully considering the points raised in the memo, including whether the Zodiac CH-601XL is susceptible to wing flutter. Each accident discussed in the NTSB memo occurred under different circumstances. Some of the accidents are still being investigated and what caused those accidents has not been determined.

Zenith Aircraft will communicate with the FAA about the issues raised in the NTSB memo. We will provide more information after we thoroughly consider the issues raised in the NTSB memo and we have spoken with the FAA about those issues.

ZENITH AIRCRAFT CO.


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List

_________________
Larry Winger
Tustin, CA
Plans building 601XL/650 with Corvair
Installing fuel system
www.mykitlog.com/lwinger
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
johnd(at)data-tech.com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:34 am    Post subject: Initial Zenith Response Reply with quote

As a builder who's now got almost 10 hours on my airframe this response
from Zenith is really frustrating. Despite the # of governmental
agencies who are concerned about flutter, the accident rate and the fact
that planes have been grounded in some European countries for months now
their only response is that they need to consider the issues raised.
What the heck have they been doing the last 3-4 months ?

Then to explain that some of the accidents are still under review and
occurred under different circumstances, etc is ludicrous since it's the
NTSB who's doing the investigations and they are the ones who have these
concerns.

If indeed the Antelope Island accident is a spar failure as well, thats
really a concern to me since thats just too many planes with similar
failures for a fleet this size. I've been willing to avoid jumping to
conclusions up till now but at this point really want to see some
concrete actions by Zenith to either discredit the flutter issue by
comprehensive testing or to come out with a fix. The fact that they are
doing this in the UK but haven't had any plans to do this in the US
market is also annoying.

Sorry to vent...

John Davis
N601JD
Burnsville, NC
lwinger wrote:
Quote:


This just posted on the Zenith site:

NTSB Issues Safety Recommendation to FAA

April 15, 2009:

NTSB Safety Recommendation to FAA: http://www.ntsb.gov/recs/letters/2009/A09_30_37.pdf

Zenith Aircraft first became aware of the above NTSB Safety Recommendation Memo on April 14, 2009, at the same time the NTSB issued its press release to the public.

We continue to believe wing flutter will not occur if the control cables are adjusted properly. Nonetheless, we are carefully considering the points raised in the memo, including whether the Zodiac CH-601XL is susceptible to wing flutter. Each accident discussed in the NTSB memo occurred under different circumstances. Some of the accidents are still being investigated and what caused those accidents has not been determined.

Zenith Aircraft will communicate with the FAA about the issues raised in the NTSB memo. We will provide more information after we thoroughly consider the issues raised in the NTSB memo and we have spoken with the FAA about those issues.

ZENITH AIRCRAFT CO.

--------
Larry Winger
Tustin, CA
Plans building 601XL/650 with Corvair
Control surfaces and wings complete
Fuselage ready to rivet
www.mykitlog.com/lwinger


Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 39325#239325





- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
swater6



Joined: 16 Dec 2006
Posts: 52
Location: Minnesota-KMIC/KANE

PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:17 am    Post subject: Re: Initial Zenith Response Reply with quote



- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List

_________________
601 XL kit N596SW reserved
Tail, control surfaces and both wings complete. Now working on fuselage

www.scottwaters.com


Last edited by swater6 on Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:39 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rickey B.



Joined: 22 Mar 2008
Posts: 70

PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:17 am    Post subject: Initial Zenith Response Reply with quote

Vent all you want! I'm pretty much in agreement!
Rick
As a builder who's now got almost 10 hours on my airframe this response
from Zenith is really frustrating. Despite the # of governmental
agencies who are concerned about flutter, the accident rate and the fact

that planes have been grounded in some European countries for months now

their only response is that they need to consider the issues raised.
What the heck have they been doing the last 3-4 months ?

Then to explain that some of the accidents are still under review and
occurred under different circumstances, etc is ludicrous since it's the
NTSB who's doing the investigations and they are the ones who have these

concerns.

If indeed the Antelope Island accident is a spar failure as well, thats
really a concern to me since thats just too many planes with similar
failures for a fleet this size. I've been willing to avoid jumping to
conclusions up till now but at this point really want to see some
concrete actions by Zenith to either discredit the flutter issue by
comprehensive testing or to come out with a fix. The fact that they are
doing this in the UK but haven't had any plans to do this in the US
market is also annoying.

Sorry to vent...

John Davis
N601JD
Burnsville, NC

DO NOT ARCHIVE


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ashontz



Joined: 27 Dec 2006
Posts: 723

PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:02 pm    Post subject: Re: Initial Zenith Response Reply with quote

What Chris is pushing is that he wants it to be known he's not a dumbass and designed and tested the plane to be flutter free and his implementation to avoid flutter is correct cable tension. Not how I would design it, but that's perfectly acceptible being that other planes also rely on proper maintenance to keep them airworthy, that's why it's call airworthiness, both the design and the condition determine airworthiness.

This is a matter of, well, there's an even better way to ensure airworthiness and it appears to be aileron balancing along with proper cable tension.

Rickey B. wrote:
Vent all you want! I'm pretty much in agreement!
Rick
As a builder who's now got almost 10 hours on my airframe this response
from Zenith is really frustrating. Despite the # of governmental
agencies who are concerned about flutter, the accident rate and the fact

that planes have been grounded in some European countries for months now

their only response is that they need to consider the issues raised.
What the heck have they been doing the last 3-4 months ?

Then to explain that some of the accidents are still under review and
occurred under different circumstances, etc is ludicrous since it's the
NTSB who's doing the investigations and they are the ones who have these

concerns.

If indeed the Antelope Island accident is a spar failure as well, thats
really a concern to me since thats just too many planes with similar
failures for a fleet this size. I've been willing to avoid jumping to
conclusions up till now but at this point really want to see some
concrete actions by Zenith to either discredit the flutter issue by
comprehensive testing or to come out with a fix. The fact that they are
doing this in the UK but haven't had any plans to do this in the US
market is also annoying.

Sorry to vent...

John Davis
N601JD
Burnsville, NC

DO NOT ARCHIVE


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kmccune



Joined: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 577
Location: Wisconsin, USA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:02 pm    Post subject: Re: Initial Zenith Response Reply with quote

Double check you cable tension and go fly.
Do this, and fly with in the design limits and you will be fine and happy.
Kevin
johnd(at)data-tech.com wrote:
As a builder who's now got almost 10 hours on my airframe this response
from Zenith is really frustrating. Despite the # of governmental
agencies who are concerned about flutter, the accident rate and the fact
that planes have been grounded in some European countries for months now
their only response is that they need to consider the issues raised.
What the heck have they been doing the last 3-4 months ?

Then to explain that some of the accidents are still under review and
occurred under different circumstances, etc is ludicrous since it's the
NTSB who's doing the investigations and they are the ones who have these
concerns.

If indeed the Antelope Island accident is a spar failure as well, thats
really a concern to me since thats just too many planes with similar
failures for a fleet this size. I've been willing to avoid jumping to
conclusions up till now but at this point really want to see some
concrete actions by Zenith to either discredit the flutter issue by
comprehensive testing or to come out with a fix. The fact that they are
doing this in the UK but haven't had any plans to do this in the US
market is also annoying.

Sorry to vent...

John Davis
N601JD
Burnsville, NC
lwinger wrote:
Quote:


This just posted on the Zenith site:

NTSB Issues Safety Recommendation to FAA

April 15, 2009:

NTSB Safety Recommendation to FAA: http://www.ntsb.gov/recs/letters/2009/A09_30_37.pdf

Zenith Aircraft first became aware of the above NTSB Safety Recommendation Memo on April 14, 2009, at the same time the NTSB issued its press release to the public.

We continue to believe wing flutter will not occur if the control cables are adjusted properly. Nonetheless, we are carefully considering the points raised in the memo, including whether the Zodiac CH-601XL is susceptible to wing flutter. Each accident discussed in the NTSB memo occurred under different circumstances. Some of the accidents are still being investigated and what caused those accidents has not been determined.

Zenith Aircraft will communicate with the FAA about the issues raised in the NTSB memo. We will provide more information after we thoroughly consider the issues raised in the NTSB memo and we have spoken with the FAA about those issues.

ZENITH AIRCRAFT CO.

--------
Larry Winger
Tustin, CA
Plans building 601XL/650 with Corvair
Control surfaces and wings complete
Fuselage ready to rivet
www.mykitlog.com/lwinger


Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 39325#239325






- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List

_________________
“Always do what you are afraid to do.”
R.W. Emerson (1803-1882)

"Real freedom is the sustained act of being an individual." WW - 2009

"Life is a good deal...it's worth it" Feb 1969
Dorothy McCune
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
PatrickW



Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 380
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:17 am    Post subject: Re: Initial Zenith Response Reply with quote

kmccune wrote:
Double check you cable tension and go fly.
Do this, and fly with in the design limits and you will be fine and happy.

It would appear that the NTSB has a different opinion...

Patrick
N63PZ


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gig Giacona



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 1416
Location: El Dorado Arkansas USA

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 7:16 am    Post subject: Re: Initial Zenith Response Reply with quote

PatrickW wrote:
kmccune wrote:
Double check you cable tension and go fly.
Do this, and fly with in the design limits and you will be fine and happy.

It would appear that the NTSB has a different opinion...

Patrick
N63PZ

We all know what opinions are like.


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List

_________________
W.R. "Gig" Giacona
601XL Under Construction
See my progress at www.peoamerica.net/N601WR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Juan Vega Jr



Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 157

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 2:04 pm    Post subject: Initial Zenith Response Reply with quote

Patrick, any goverment group that gets lobbied enough will have an opinion based on what they are pushed to have an opinion on.
As ZBAGs did in this instance.
Juan

--


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group