Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Kolb-List Digest: 7 Msgs - 10/03/10

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tc1917(at)bellsouth.net
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 2:23 am    Post subject: Kolb-List Digest: 7 Msgs - 10/03/10 Reply with quote

I have been listening to all of you talk about thrust line, etc on your
kolbs. Some Slingshot talk also. I am wondering at this point if the
slingshot people have raised the rear of their engine. If you do not, the
thrust will literally push you over. I learned this over five hundred hours
ago. Mike Highsmith put me up to it and he was very correct. I have the
912 ul raised in the rear off the mounts 7/8s of an inch higher than the
front mount. You see, the angle of attack of the wing on the slingshot is
only 9 degrees rather than the 12 degrees of the average other kolbs. The
boom of the slingshot flies mostly straight and level at most speeds,
including very fast. It does not continually rise as do the MkIIIs and
such. If you do not raise the engine in the rear it will push you over and
the faster you go the worse it gets. It will work against itself. On
take-off I learned very quickly (thanks to Hauck) you only use 75 to 80
percent power until you wheels are clear and you are climbing. Relieves the
torque both to the left and nosing over. If you need further information or
pics, let me know. I would think 60 hp from an HK would be rather slow for
a slingshot. It has such a short wing it needs power to sustain flight. I
found a 582 was good but a 912 put some of the weight forward and worked
wonders. Actually flew better than the 582. I would not want to fly it
with less than 65 hps. Of course, I only burn 3 gals an hour at 80/85 mph
cruise compared to the 4/5 gals an hour with the 582. I also went to a
longer three blade taper point from warp. Too bad I still have the rom, rom
in the engine but thanks to a better muffler system, it is tolerable now.
Trial and error brought me to the answers and I hope you have good luck on
your experimentation away from a workable solution. Ted Cowan, Alabama
912UL zoom zoom.


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
tc1917(at)bellsouth.net
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 4:26 am    Post subject: Kolb-List Digest: 7 Msgs - 10/03/10 Reply with quote

I decided to send a pic of my little slingshot idling, waiting to take off.
Note the angle of the blade in relation to the boom. Ted Cowan


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List



_1017975.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  88.64 KB
 Viewed:  2645 Time(s)

_1017975.jpg


Back to top
Thom Riddle



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 1597
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA (9G0)

PostPosted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 3:38 am    Post subject: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 7 Msgs - 10/03/10 Reply with quote

Ted,

My slingshot hits a wall at 95 mph and that is its top speed. Anything above about 85 mph requires more and more nose down elevator. I believe that this is due to the thrust line angle being way too high, as you mentioned. I suspected this but could not get Travis to tell me what angle it was supposed to be so I've left it alone. The drawings and plans that I have don't say. That is probably why Travis could not tell me.

Now that I know your aft end of the mount is 7/8" higher than the forward end, I can start thinking seriously about fixing mine. Since the motor mount for the Jabiru is way different from the Rotax, 7/8" may not be the right answer for me.

At your convenience, if you could measure the thrust line angle relative to the bottom chord of the wing and let me know what that is, I can adjust the Jabiru motor mount for that angle. Right now, my thrust line is pointing UP by 3.5 degrees relative to the bottom chord of the wing and it should be pointing down somewhat relative to the bottom chord, based on your photo and what you said.

Thanks for your help.


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
Thom Riddle
Buffalo, NY (9G0)



Don't worry about old age... it doesn't last very long.
- Anonymous
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group