|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
alienwes
Joined: 11 Dec 2012 Posts: 64 Location: Roswell, NM
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 4:59 pm Post subject: 80 or 100 hp? |
|
|
I notice that the Kolb website gives the same climb rates and takeoff distances on the Mark III with both the 80 and 100 hp 912. What have others discovered? Does the 100 hp offer any advantages/disadvantages on this airframe over the 80 hp?
Wes
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ Wesley Elliott
Sport Pilot-PPC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Larlaeb
Joined: 02 Apr 2013 Posts: 75 Location: League City, Texas United States
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 6:05 am Post subject: Re: 80 or 100 hp? |
|
|
My MkIIIC has the 80hp and I haven't flown the 100hp or flown with one but the previous owner has. He reports that he notices a pretty good difference at altitude. Performance from high fields is better. I would imagine that the 100hp is or can be faster too but as we all know the returns on adding hp to a draggy form diminish rapidly.
Thanks,
Allan
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Hauck
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 4639 Location: Titus, Alabama (hauck's holler)
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:31 am Post subject: 80 or 100 hp? |
|
|
Kolbers:
Essentially, the 100 hp will climb faster than the 80hp, especially at high
altitudes. Had a good chance to compare performance between my airplane,
100 hp, and a MKIII, 80 hp, during a flight from Price, Utah, to Wendover,
UT. During the climb to aprx 12,000 feet ASL, the 80hp could not keep up.
Top speed and cruise speed remain about the same for the 65, 80, and 100 hp
engines on my mkIII. Seems to hit a wall about 85 mph.
Actually, on a mkIII, the more power applied on takeoff, after a certain
point, the longer it takes to get off the ground. I believe this is caused
by the configuration of our engines in the high pusher configuration. I
experienced this the first time I tried to takeoff after swapping from 80 to
100 hp engines. Came as a complete surprise. Now, after many takeoffs, I
am not aware of the difference, if there is any anymore.
There are a lot of great advantages of both engines. Don't have time to go
into them now.
john h
mkIII
Titus, Alabama
My MkIIIC has the 80hp and I haven't flown the 100hp or flown with one but
the previous owner has. He reports that he notices a pretty good difference
at altitude. Performance from high fields is better. I would imagine that
the 100hp is or can be faster too but as we all know the returns on adding
hp to a draggy form diminish rapidly.
Thanks,
Allan
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ John Hauck
MKIII/912ULS
hauck's holler
Titus, Alabama |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alienwes
Joined: 11 Dec 2012 Posts: 64 Location: Roswell, NM
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:41 pm Post subject: Re: 80 or 100 hp? |
|
|
Allan, John, thanks for the replies. I find it interesting that the 100 hp took longer on takeoffs. Too much of a good thing maybe??
Would be interested in hearing the benefits you have for the 80 hp John if you get the time. Seems it is more popular when I see Mark III's for sale. Maybe lower fuel consumption from the 80 hp?
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ Wesley Elliott
Sport Pilot-PPC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Hauck
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 4639 Location: Titus, Alabama (hauck's holler)
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:57 pm Post subject: 80 or 100 hp? |
|
|
First off 80 hp runs on 87 octane unleaded. 100 requires 91 and higher.
Recommended spark plug change: 200 hours for the 80 and 100 hours for the
100.
80 runs a lot cooler.
Mine burned 4 gph at 5000 cruise. 100 hp burns 5 gph at 5000 cruise. Both
have same cruise speed on my mkIII.
The 100 definitely climbs better and gives you a lot more boot in the butt
than the 80. I could never go back to the 80.
I did the 1994 flight, US border and Deadhorse/Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, flight
with an 80. Did fine, but the 100 gave me a lot more comfort flying over
Atigun Pass through the Brooks Range in Alaska.
Both are great engines. Wish I had the money for a 912IS. I always wanted
a good fuel injection system to simplify the system, but I think the 912IS
also has dual carbs. ;-(
john h
mkIII
Titus, Alabama
Allan, John, thanks for the replies. I find it interesting that the 100 hp
took longer on takeoffs. Too much of a good thing maybe??
Would be interested in hearing the benefits you have for the 80 hp John if
you get the time. Seems it is more popular when I see Mark III's for sale.
Maybe lower fuel consumption from the 80 hp?
--------
Wesley Elliott
Sport Pilot-PPC
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ John Hauck
MKIII/912ULS
hauck's holler
Titus, Alabama |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Hauck
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 4639 Location: Titus, Alabama (hauck's holler)
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:00 pm Post subject: 80 or 100 hp? |
|
|
Where did I get that idea from? Probably the 914 turbo?
Looks like the 912IS is a single throttle body. That makes a lot of sense.
john
Both are great engines. Wish I had the money for a 912IS. I always wanted
a good fuel injection system to simplify the system, but I think the 912IS
also has dual carbs. ;-(
john h
mkIII
Titus, Alabama
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ John Hauck
MKIII/912ULS
hauck's holler
Titus, Alabama |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alienwes
Joined: 11 Dec 2012 Posts: 64 Location: Roswell, NM
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:46 pm Post subject: Re: 80 or 100 hp? |
|
|
Thanks John. The 80 hp has some really good attributes that I did not know of. I am used to everyone in the PPC world saying it's gotta be the 100 hp. It is probably because the PPC wings are so ineffecient. Thanks again for your input.
Wes
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ Wesley Elliott
Sport Pilot-PPC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|