|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
barryhancock
Joined: 09 Oct 2008 Posts: 285
|
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 7:52 am Post subject: Re: Nanchang MAUW |
|
|
I have found that you have to stay ahead of the imbalance from early on in the flight. As soon as one of the tanks comes off 60, watch every 5 minutes or so to see when the other one comes off and attempt to keep them balanced with excess yaw and the fuller wing tank high. You might think this cuts down your TAS dramatically, but I have found it to only be a couple of knots difference. Waiting until the tanks are low to fix things is too late...
Happy slipping,
Barry
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
_________________ Barry Hancock
Worldwide Warbirds, Inc.
www.worldwidewarbirds.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jacques
Joined: 06 May 2009 Posts: 36 Location: Pessac, France
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 11:44 am Post subject: Re: Nanchang MAUW |
|
|
Not possible to use a fuel valve with 2 (or 3 if you have a 3rd tank) to choose your tank in flight, like on Piper's, Cessna, etc?
Just have to remove the collect tank, maybe individual air vent, cancel the cut off fuel valve using the off position of the new one and why not an electric fuel pump.
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodja51
Joined: 13 May 2015 Posts: 40 Location: MELBOURNE AUSTRALIA
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2022 12:47 pm Post subject: Re: Nanchang MAUW |
|
|
At the Nanchang conference the Chinese engineers mentioned a MTOW of around 1650 kg being the end test point. I would assume that 1400 probably came about from a combination of wear and tear / gear loadings and the fact that with full fuel , two pax at 100 kg you pretty much hit 1400kg. So why pay higher landing fees for no reason. The other reason might be the stall speed of 59-60 knots might keep the aircraft within the risks associated with the category of aircraft ( we call it permit index etc in OZ) .. so in all practicalities , pushing the weight up anything up to 250 kg is probably of little real effect - on both airframe / gear in normal use. It might have some effect on fatigue in the long run. The other point to note is that the CoG envelope also has an expanded envelope which I used in my re-weigh a few years ago. It meant I didn’t need as much ballast to replace the ADF gear removed etc. By the way , for those who have lead ballast in the tail frame , make sure you check it for cracking. My LAME found a crack in the aft frame last inspection. Check rudder balance as well ! …
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ttail
Joined: 24 Jun 2013 Posts: 120
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2022 1:43 pm Post subject: Re: Nanchang MAUW |
|
|
What is this "expanded" C of G envelope of which you speak Wodja ? love to see some details.
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
_________________ Sean Trestrail
ttail[at]internode.on.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carl.rueck(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2022 11:11 pm Post subject: Nanchang MAUW |
|
|
Please remove my name from this distribution
Thank you
Carl
Carl-r(at)telus.net.
Quote: | On Feb 10, 2022, at 4:01 PM, Ttail <ttail(at)internode.on.net> wrote:
What is this extended C of G envelope of which you speak Wodja ? love to see some details.
--------
Sean Trestrail
ttail[at]internode.on.net
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=505979#505979
|
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
stephen.hayne
Joined: 01 Nov 2013 Posts: 59 Location: United States
|
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2022 1:09 pm Post subject: Re: Nanchang MAUW |
|
|
cjpilot710(at)aol.com wrote: | At some point in the future I plan on adding an adjustable rudder trim.
|
I have adjustable rudder trim and it makes no difference. Still feeds from the left. I also have 2-axis Dynon autopilot (ailerons and elevator). Still feeds from the left...
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
_________________ -
Stephen Hayne, Cyber Security Consultant, Professor Emeritus (retired)
443LM Nanchang CJA
http://selfsynchronize.com/hayne/plane/cj6.asp |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|