Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Aeroduct vs. Scat Tubing

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV10-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
robin1(at)mrmoisture.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:21 am    Post subject: Aeroduct vs. Scat Tubing Reply with quote

I have been thinking a lot about the oil cooling temp issues for the -10. Some have chosen to upgraded the oil cooler. I have an interest in controlling the oil temps by improving the air flow to the box and them adding a gate in the oil cooler housing that will allow me to restrict the air flow to the oil cooler in cold weather. (photo attached)
I am considering swapping out the standard Scat Tubing for Silicone lined high temp Aeroduct hose. I have purchased this hose for my OH Console to replace the hearting scat tubes. It’s nice stuff! My thinking is that this duct is much smoother and significantly less corrugated that scat tubing which SHOULD improve airflow to the oil cooler. The down side is that this ducting is only sold in 12 foot lengths at $150 / 12 feet. I probably need 2 feet.
My other concept is to take two 3” tubes from the baffling (one on each side of the engine, I prefer this symmetry) and have both of these 3” tubes feed the oil cooler box. I don’t know if I will have room to run a 3” duct from the right side on the engine to the oil cooler mounted in the typical location.
To further complicate things I will be using the James Cowl & Plenum.
I would appreciate any observations on using the smooth Silicone lined Aeroduct hose vs. Scat Tube and or comments on two 3” tubes/duct vs. the one larger tube/duct.

Thanks,
Robin
Thinking of an RV-8A…Mental illness runs in my family.

http://www.hrpworld.com/index.cfm?form_prod_id=3171&action=product&form_cat_id=59,7
[img]cid:image001.jpg(at)01C83FD3.86A10CD0[/img]
[img]cid:image002.jpg(at)01C83FD3.86A10CD0[/img] [img]cid:image003.jpg(at)01C83FD3.86A10CD0[/img]


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List



image001.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  30.2 KB
 Viewed:  187 Time(s)

image001.jpg



image002.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  55.9 KB
 Viewed:  205 Time(s)

image002.jpg



image003.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  79.91 KB
 Viewed:  216 Time(s)

image003.jpg



Oil_cooler_control_small.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  63.43 KB
 Viewed:  206 Time(s)

Oil_cooler_control_small.jpg


Back to top
AV8ORJWC



Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 1149
Location: Aurora, Oregon "Home of VANS"

PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:21 pm    Post subject: Aeroduct vs. Scat Tubing Reply with quote

Robin, that’s a most interesting landing gear leg and brake assembly (shown).

You will find many advantages to the course you are pursuing. LoPresti would be please with your acknowledgement on air flow control. Let me know how much you have left, I would be interested, Too. I am looking at an improved flow path over the stock configuration.

John Cox


From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robin Marks
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 11:14 AM
To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Aeroduct vs. Scat Tubing


I have been thinking a lot about the oil cooling temp issues for the -10. Some have chosen to upgraded the oil cooler. I have an interest in controlling the oil temps by improving the air flow to the box and them adding a gate in the oil cooler housing that will allow me to restrict the air flow to the oil cooler in cold weather. (photo attached)
I am considering swapping out the standard Scat Tubing for Silicone lined high temp Aeroduct hose. I have purchased this hose for my OH Console to replace the hearting scat tubes. It’s nice stuff! My thinking is that this duct is much smoother and significantly less corrugated that scat tubing which SHOULD improve airflow to the oil cooler. The down side is that this ducting is only sold in 12 foot lengths at $150 / 12 feet. I probably need 2 feet.
My other concept is to take two 3” tubes from the baffling (one on each side of the engine, I prefer this symmetry) and have both of these 3” tubes feed the oil cooler box. I don’t know if I will have room to run a 3” duct from the right side on the engine to the oil cooler mounted in the typical location.
To further complicate things I will be using the James Cowl & Plenum.
I would appreciate any observations on using the smooth Silicone lined Aeroduct hose vs. Scat Tube and or comments on two 3” tubes/duct vs. the one larger tube/duct.

Thanks,
Robin
Thinking of an RV-8A…Mental illness runs in my family.

http://www.hrpworld.com/index.cfm?form_prod_id=3171&action=product&form_cat_id=59,7
[img]cid:image001.jpg(at)01C83FDC.8CF7BC60[/img]
[img]cid:image002.jpg(at)01C83FDC.8CF7BC60[/img] [img]cid:image003.jpg(at)01C83FDC.8CF7BC60[/img]


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List



image003.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  79.91 KB
 Viewed:  196 Time(s)

image003.jpg



image002.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  55.9 KB
 Viewed:  219 Time(s)

image002.jpg



image001.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  30.2 KB
 Viewed:  187 Time(s)

image001.jpg


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tim Olson



Joined: 25 Jan 2007
Posts: 2872

PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 4:15 pm    Post subject: Aeroduct vs. Scat Tubing Reply with quote

You should be able to do some easy area of a circle type
calculations and determine if your dual-fed SCAT tubes
can provide the same amount of air all other things
being equal. As diameter goes up, the area increases
substantially so it might be hard to get 2 SCAT tubes
to have the same flow as one, without going to some
pretty good sized dual tubes. But, as long as you get
the air there I should work I'd think.

Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying
do not archive
Robin Marks wrote:
Quote:
I have been thinking a lot about the oil cooling temp issues for the
-10. Some have chosen to upgraded the oil cooler. I have an interest in
controlling the oil temps by improving the air flow to the box and them
adding a gate in the oil cooler housing that will allow me to restrict
the air flow to the oil cooler in cold weather. (photo attached)

I am considering swapping out the standard Scat Tubing for Silicone
lined high temp Aeroduct hose. I have purchased this hose for my OH
Console to replace the hearting scat tubes. It’s nice stuff! My thinking
is that this duct is much smoother and significantly less corrugated
that scat tubing which SHOULD improve airflow to the oil cooler. The
down side is that this ducting is only sold in 12 foot lengths at $150 /
12 feet. I probably need 2 feet.

My other concept is to take two 3” tubes from the baffling (one on each
side of the engine, I prefer this symmetry) and have both of these 3”
tubes feed the oil cooler box. I don’t know if I will have room to run a
3” duct from the right side on the engine to the oil cooler mounted in
the typical location.

To further complicate things I will be using the James Cowl & Plenum.

I would appreciate any observations on using the smooth Silicone lined
Aeroduct hose vs. Scat Tube and or comments on two 3” tubes/duct vs. the
one larger tube/duct.



Thanks,

Robin

Thinking of an RV-8A…Mental illness runs in my family.



http://www.hrpworld.com/index.cfm?form_prod_id=3171&action=product&form_cat_id=59,7
<http://www.hrpworld.com/index.cfm?form_prod_id=3171&action=product&form_cat_id=59,7>


http://www.hrpworld.com/client_images/ecommerce/client_39/products/3171_hdr_2_l.jpg

http://www.hrpworld.com/client_images/ecommerce/client_39/products/3171_1.jpg* *http://www.hrpworld.com/client_images/ecommerce/client_39/products/3171_2.jpg




------------------------------------------------------------------------



- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ScooterF15



Joined: 19 Jun 2006
Posts: 136

PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 4:50 pm    Post subject: Aeroduct vs. Scat Tubing Reply with quote

Kind of a side note as we're talking about cooling and air flow. I took my cowling off last week and noticed that the aluminum shielding I had applied to the bottom cowling had been peeled up just underneath the oil cooler. Now I can't say for sure, but this seems to indicate that the air is flowing forward in this location; probably not the most efficient flow pattern. Possibly additional louvers in this location may help.

I have the stock oil cooler with a stock installation. You might notice I've added a few extra louvers on the bottom cowl. I've also added a "dryer vent" exhaust on the exit side of the oil cooler (see photo). My hope is this would help the air exiting the oil cooler to more smoothly mix with the exiting air. I have no hard data to back up whether these were actual improvements in air flow; however I'll say that my oil temp and CHTs have become lower and more manageable with the changes.

-Jim
40134 - Flying




In a message dated 12/16/2007 2:27:23 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, robin1(at)mrmoisture.com writes:
Quote:

I have been thinking a lot about the oil cooling temp issues for the -10. Some have chosen to upgraded the oil cooler. I have an interest in controlling the oil temps by improving the air flow to the box and them adding a gate in the oil cooler housing that will allow me to restrict the air flow to the oil cooler in cold weather. (photo attached)
I am considering swapping out the standard Scat Tubing for Silicone lined high temp Aeroduct hose. I have purchased this hose for my OH Console to replace the hearting scat tubes. It’s nice stuff! My thinking is that this duct is much smoother and significantly less corrugated that scat tubing which SHOULD improve airflow to the oil cooler. The down side is that this ducting is only sold in 12 foot lengths at $150 / 12 feet. I probably need 2 feet.
My other concept is to take two 3” tubes from the baffling (one on each side of the engine, I prefer this symmetry) and have both of these 3” tubes feed the oil cooler box. I don’t know if I will have room to run a 3” duct from the right side on the engine to the oil cooler mounted in the typical location.
To further complicate things I will be using the James Cowl & Plenum.
I would appreciate any observations on using the smooth Silicone lined Aeroduct hose vs. Scat Tube and or comments on two 3” tubes/duct vs. the one larger tube/duct.

Thanks,
Robin
Thinking of an RV-8A…Mental illness runs in my family.




Jim "Scooter" McGrew
http://www.mit.edu/~jsmcgrew

See AOL's top rated recipes and easy ways to stay in shape for winter.


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List



SANY0205.JPG
 Description:
 Filesize:  51.21 KB
 Viewed:  203 Time(s)

SANY0205.JPG



SANY0206.JPG
 Description:
 Filesize:  30.77 KB
 Viewed:  201 Time(s)

SANY0206.JPG



141-4162_IMG.JPG
 Description:
 Filesize:  54.57 KB
 Viewed:  208 Time(s)

141-4162_IMG.JPG


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AV8ORJWC



Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 1149
Location: Aurora, Oregon "Home of VANS"

PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 5:26 pm    Post subject: Aeroduct vs. Scat Tubing Reply with quote

High pressure and cooler air from the upper plenum escapes through the oil heat exchanger and collides with the downflow past the cooling fins on the port side. It is a great example of the burble generated from the collision of air masses. It may also indicate an adhesion problem between the film and the lower cowl finish coating.

John Cox
40600 - dreaming


From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of JSMcGrew(at)aol.com
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 4:49 PM
To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Aeroduct vs. Scat Tubing


Kind of a side note as we're talking about cooling and air flow. I took my cowling off last week and noticed that the aluminum shielding I had applied to the bottom cowling had been peeled up just underneath the oil cooler. Now I can't say for sure, but this seems to indicate that the air is flowing forward in this location; probably not the most efficient flow pattern. Possibly additional louvers in this location may help.



I have the stock oil cooler with a stock installation. You might notice I've added a few extra louvers on the bottom cowl. I've also added a "dryer vent" exhaust on the exit side of the oil cooler (see photo). My hope is this would help the air exiting the oil cooler to more smoothly mix with the exiting air. I have no hard data to back up whether these were actual improvements in air flow; however I'll say that my oil temp and CHTs have become lower and more manageable with the changes.



-Jim

40134 - Flying



[img]cid:image001.jpg(at)01C84009.0B22EA20[/img]



[img]cid:image002.jpg(at)01C84009.0B22EA20[/img]

In a message dated 12/16/2007 2:27:23 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, robin1(at)mrmoisture.com writes:
Quote:

I ha[img]cid:image003.jpg(at)01C84009.0B22EA20[/img]ve been thinking a lot about the oil cooling temp issues for the -10. Some have chosen to upgraded the oil cooler. I have an interest in controlling the oil temps by improving the air flow to the box and them adding a gate in the oil cooler housing that will allow me to restrict the air flow to the oil cooler in cold weather. (photo attached)
I am considering swapping out the standard Scat Tubing for Silicone lined high temp Aeroduct hose. I have purchased this hose for my OH Console to replace the hearting scat tubes. It’s nice stuff! My thinking is that this duct is much smoother and significantly less corrugated that scat tubing which SHOULD improve airflow to the oil cooler. The down side is that this ducting is only sold in 12 foot lengths at $150 / 12 feet. I probably need 2 feet.
My other concept is to take two 3” tubes from the baffling (one on each side of the engine, I prefer this symmetry) and have both of these 3” tubes feed the oil cooler box. I don’t know if I will have room to run a 3” duct from the right side on the engine to the oil cooler mounted in the typical location.
To further complicate things I will be using the James Cowl & Plenum.
I would appreciate any observations on using the smooth Silicone lined Aeroduct hose vs. Scat Tube and or comments on two 3” tubes/duct vs. the one larger tube/duct.

Thanks,
Robin
Thinking of an RV-8A…Mental illness runs in my family.





Jim "Scooter" McGrew
http://www.mit.edu/~jsmcgrew





See AOL's top rated recipes and easy ways to stay in shape for winter.


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List



image003.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  54.57 KB
 Viewed:  205 Time(s)

image003.jpg



image002.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  30.77 KB
 Viewed:  201 Time(s)

image002.jpg



image001.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  51.21 KB
 Viewed:  207 Time(s)

image001.jpg


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dc71(at)netspace.net.au
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:19 pm    Post subject: Aeroduct vs. Scat Tubing Reply with quote

Assuming laminar flow, flow through a tube is proportional to the
fourth power of the radius. Therefore to get the same flow through
two smaller tubes, the radius of each small tube has to be approx 84%
of the larger tube, without taking into account frictional losses.

Hope this helps
Indran
On 17/12/2007, at 9:14 AM, Tim Olson wrote:

Quote:


You should be able to do some easy area of a circle type
calculations and determine if your dual-fed SCAT tubes
can provide the same amount of air all other things
being equal. As diameter goes up, the area increases
substantially so it might be hard to get 2 SCAT tubes
to have the same flow as one, without going to some
pretty good sized dual tubes. But, as long as you get
the air there I should work I'd think.

Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying
do not archive
Robin Marks wrote:
> I have been thinking a lot about the oil cooling temp issues for
> the -10. Some have chosen to upgraded the oil cooler. I have an
> interest in controlling the oil temps by improving the air flow to
> the box and them adding a gate in the oil cooler housing that will
> allow me to restrict the air flow to the oil cooler in cold
> weather. (photo attached)
> I am considering swapping out the standard Scat Tubing for
> Silicone lined high temp Aeroduct hose. I have purchased this hose
> for my OH Console to replace the hearting scat tubes. It’s nice
> stuff! My thinking is that this duct is much smoother and
> significantly less corrugated that scat tubing which SHOULD
> improve airflow to the oil cooler. The down side is that this
> ducting is only sold in 12 foot lengths at $150 / 12 feet. I
> probably need 2 feet.
> My other concept is to take two 3” tubes from the baffling (one on
> each side of the engine, I prefer this symmetry) and have both of
> these 3” tubes feed the oil cooler box. I don’t know if I will
> have room to run a 3” duct from the right side on the engine to
> the oil cooler mounted in the typical location.
> To further complicate things I will be using the James Cowl & Plenum.
> I would appreciate any observations on using the smooth Silicone
> lined Aeroduct hose vs. Scat Tube and or comments on two 3” tubes/
> duct vs. the one larger tube/duct.
> Thanks,
> Robin
> Thinking of an RV-8A…Mental illness runs in my family.
> http://www.hrpworld.com/index.cfm?
> form_prod_id=3171&action=product&form_cat_id=59,7 <http://
> www.hrpworld.com/index.cfm?
> form_prod_id=3171&action=product&form_cat_id=59,7> http://
> www.hrpworld.com/client_images/ecommerce/client_39/products/
> 3171_hdr_2_l.jpg
> http://www.hrpworld.com/client_images/ecommerce/client_39/products/
> 3171_1.jpg* *http://www.hrpworld.com/client_images/ecommerce/
> client_39/products/3171_2.jpg
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---




- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV10-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group