|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jpspencer(at)cableone.net Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:52 am Post subject: ethanol in autogas |
|
|
Anybody know how the 912s likes autofuel with ethanol in it? For all the info that Rotax sends out on their engines I don't remember seeing anything on this subject from them. Anyody got a link or info?
Thx Joe
Sad but informative. Those of us using auto fuel in our airplane motors
now have to consider many additional problems that alcohol causes and
it's not even good for cars! This was published today in the Atlanta
Journal-Constitution and written by the CEO of a petroleum distributor
in Atlanta. Who is pushing ethanol? It's apparently not petroleum companies.
Ron
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
zenith601xl(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 7:44 am Post subject: ethanol in autogas |
|
|
I recall reading a year ago that Rotax prohibits the use of ethanol bearing fuel. Ethanol goes back to the 80's it when was called gasohol and car many car manufacturers warned against using it because of deterioration of engine seals and rubber parts.
Ethanol results in poorer fuel consumption according to several automotive publications tests. For us that means reduced range and endurance since larger fuel tanks and greater weight aren't a very good choice for us. Those same reports also mention the cost of ethanol production being higher than gasoline. It is only profitable because of Federal subsidies. The car manufacturers also receive Federal subsidies for producing alternate fuel vehicles and ethanol is the only immediately available alternate. Farmers enjoy higher corn prices as well. The consumer pays for all of the subsidies as well as higher prices for corn and beef which is fed with more expensive corn.
The government is taking care of us again.
Dennis
On Jan 29, 2008 9:44 AM, Joe Spencer <jpspencer(at)cableone.net (jpspencer(at)cableone.net)> wrote:
[quote] Anybody know how the 912s likes autofuel with ethanol in it? For all the info that Rotax sends out on their engines I don't remember seeing anything on this subject from them. Anyody got a link or info?
Thx Joe
Sad but informative. Those of us using auto fuel in our airplane motors
now have to consider many additional problems that alcohol causes and
it's not even good for cars! This was published today in the Atlanta
Journal-Constitution and written by the CEO of a petroleum distributor
in Atlanta. Who is pushing ethanol? It's apparently not petroleum companies.
Ron
[b]
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gig Giacona
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1416 Location: El Dorado Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:05 am Post subject: Re: ethanol and other stuff in autogas |
|
|
The problem with autogas is that you never really know what is in it. We had a local problem that lasted for over a year.
It all started when almost everyone that drove a GMC or Chevy truck, Tahoe or Suburban had their fuel pump fail. And then fail again. And again. Since almost all of these were happening on 2 model years and they were current model years they were under warranty and finally GM had the dealerships start sending in the pumps. They found that some non-metal piece was failing but couldn't figure out why because it was only happening in this area.
Then they started having samples of the fuel in the failed trucks sent in to be tested. What they found was that the chemistry on the gas was, to quote a guy at the Chevy dealer I know, "Really F*&^ed up."
See, there is one refinery here and virtually all fuel here comes from that one refinery. It doesn't matter if it is Connoco, Exxon or no name.
GM threatened to sue for damages the refinery wrote a check out of court and fixed the problem.
I was told by a refinery engineer that the reports showed that if this part was submerged in this fuel mix for more than 2 months it would fail 95% of the time. If it was in there for 5 months the failure rate approached 100%.
The moral of this story is there are reasons that 100LL avgas costs what it does.
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
_________________ W.R. "Gig" Giacona
601XL Under Construction
See my progress at www.peoamerica.net/N601WR |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dougsnash(at)yahoo.com Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:23 am Post subject: ethanol in autogas |
|
|
Actually, if I remember correctly, Rotax allows up to
5% Ethanol. Of course, that doesn't help us much
considering that most Ethanol laced fuels are at least
10% in North America.
Doug MacDonald
NW Ontario, Canada
CH-701 Scratch Builder
--- Dennis Shoup <zenith601xl(at)gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: | I recall reading a year ago that Rotax
prohibits the use of ethanol
bearing fuel. Ethanol goes back to the 80's it when
was called gasohol and
car many car manufacturers warned against using it
because of deterioration
of engine seals and rubber parts.
Ethanol results in poorer fuel consumption
according to several
automotive publications tests. For us that means
reduced range and
endurance since larger fuel tanks and greater weight
aren't a very good
choice for us. Those same reports also mention the
cost of ethanol
production being higher than gasoline. It is only
profitable because of
Federal subsidies. The car manufacturers also
receive Federal subsidies for
producing alternate fuel vehicles and ethanol is the
only immediately
available alternate. Farmers enjoy higher corn
prices as well. The
consumer pays for all of the subsidies as well as
higher prices for corn and
beef which is fed with more expensive corn.
The government is taking care of us again.
Dennis
On Jan 29, 2008 9:44 AM, Joe Spencer
<jpspencer(at)cableone.net> wrote:
> Anybody know how the 912s likes autofuel with
ethanol in it? For all the
> info that Rotax sends out on their engines I don't
remember seeing anything
> on this subject from them. Anyody got a link or
info?
>
> Thx Joe
>
> Sad but informative. Those of us using auto fuel
in our airplane motors
> now have to consider many additional problems that
alcohol causes and
> it's not even good for cars! This was published
today in the Atlanta
> Journal-Constitution and written by the CEO of a
petroleum distributor
> in Atlanta. Who is pushing ethanol? It's
apparently not petroleum
> companies.
> Ron
>
> *
>
> *
>
>
|
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
larry(at)macsmachine.com Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:25 am Post subject: ethanol in autogas |
|
|
Dennis,
In addition to these problems, which are true enough, it takes 3 gallons
of water to make one gallon of ethanol and the water tables are going
down where these processing
plants are located. The pollution from ethanol is a more serious
problem than gasoline and the only reason we're doing this is, as you
say, government support.
I won't buy an E85 vehicle or use that product and we've quit buying
beef, where possible, as a matter of principle.
Larry McFarland
do not archive
Dennis Shoup wrote:
Quote: | I recall reading a year ago that Rotax prohibits the use of
ethanol bearing fuel. Ethanol goes back to the 80's it when was
called gasohol and car many car manufacturers warned against using it
because of deterioration of engine seals and rubber parts.
Ethanol results in poorer fuel consumption according to several
automotive publications tests. For us that means reduced range and
endurance since larger fuel tanks and greater weight aren't a very
good choice for us. Those same reports also mention the cost of
ethanol production being higher than gasoline. It is only profitable
because of Federal subsidies. The car manufacturers also receive
Federal subsidies for producing alternate fuel vehicles and ethanol is
the only immediately available alternate. Farmers enjoy higher corn
prices as well. The consumer pays for all of the subsidies as well as
higher prices for corn and beef which is fed with more expensive corn.
The government is taking care of us again.
Dennis
On Jan 29, 2008 9:44 AM, Joe Spencer <jpspencer(at)cableone.net
<mailto:jpspencer(at)cableone.net>> wrote:
Anybody know how the 912s likes autofuel with ethanol in it? For
all the info that Rotax sends out on their engines I don't
remember seeing anything on this subject from them. Anyody got a
link or info?
Thx Joe
Sad but informative. Those of us using auto fuel in our airplane
motors
now have to consider many additional problems that alcohol causes and
it's not even good for cars! This was published today in the Atlanta
Journal-Constitution and written by the CEO of a petroleum
distributor
in Atlanta. Who is pushing ethanol? It's apparently not petroleum
companies.
Ron
*
*
*
*
|
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
moorecomp
Joined: 14 Aug 2006 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:10 am Post subject: Re: ethanol in autogas |
|
|
All,
SI-912-016
http://www.rotax-aircraft-engines.com/pdf/dokus/d03830.pdf
Page 8
"Fuel with more than 5% alcohol added must not be used."
Best regards,
Craig Moore A&P
Mancelona, MI
701 builder wannabe
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
entecrj(at)sbcglobal.net Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:19 am Post subject: ethanol in autogas |
|
|
[quote] Subject: Re: ethanol in autogas
<I recall reading a year ago that Rotax prohibits the use of ethanol bearing fuel. Ethanol goes back to the 80's it when was called gasohol and car many car manufacturers warned against using it because of deterioration of engine seals and rubber parts.
Ethanol results in poorer fuel consumption according to several automotive publications tests.
< Farmers enjoy higher corn prices as well. The consumer pays for all of the subsidies as well as higher prices for corn and beef which is fed with more expensive corn.
+++++++++++++++++++
I started burning gasohol in my 81 buick right after I bought it new in 1981, it was still running great with no problems when I sold it with 130,000 miles on it. I still run gasohol in my car and pickup.
As far as the "expensive corn" that is being fed to the cattle, this is called brewers grain, and is currently being given to the feedlots.
R. Johnson
Dodge City, Kansas
do not archive
[b]
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
craig(at)craigandjean.com Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:36 am Post subject: ethanol in autogas |
|
|
Kitplanes just did a tour of the Rotax plant and asked the ethanol question.
Here is what the factory says:
"I asked about ethanol in gasoline. (Premium auto gas is the recommended
912/914 fuel.) The answer: Up to 5% is OK if airframe systems can tolerate
it
Overall it is a very interesting article for Rotax and non-Rotax owners
alike. But you have to be a subscriber. For example I had heard that you
could fly a 912 at 50% power after loss of coolant. But the following was
news to me:
"Now focusing on the 912/914 market, Rotax noted some of the unconventional
features. Liquid-cooling the cylinder heads adds to the durability of the
valves, valve seats and the heads themselves. The engines can fly for up to
an hour without coolant, as the lower liners are air-cooled."
-- Craig
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mountain4don
Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:07 pm Post subject: ethanol in autogas |
|
|
Larry,
Those of us that live in the Heartland of the United States wish to purchase products made in the United States to support our neighbors and citizens of the United States. I gladly burn American Made E85 in my E85 enabled, American Made pickup truck. And am planning to design my 601 XL engine to also run on E85. I ate American Made beef and vegetables for my supper tonight, while watching the free water falling out of the sky in the form of snow. Water is not used up. It is always recycled. And I don't believe we are going to run out in the next thousand years. The oceans are rising aren't they? And I don't wish to support any more middle eastern oil sheiks and increase our foreign deficit. I like American Made tools also. And the things you say about alcohol production simply aren't true or relevant to the subject of burning alcohol in our airplanes.
Don Mountain
LarryMcFarland <larry(at)macsmachine.com> wrote:[quote] --> Zenith-List message posted by: LarryMcFarland
Dennis,
In addition to these problems, which are true enough, it takes 3 gallons
of water to make one gallon of ethanol and the water tables are going
down where these processing
plants are located. The pollution from ethanol is a more serious
problem than gasoline and the only reason we're doing this is, as you
say, government support.
I won't buy an E85 vehicle or use that product and we've quit buying
beef, where possible, as a matter of principle.
Larry McFarland
do not archive
Dennis Shoup wrote:
[quote] I recall reading a year ago that Rotax prohibits the use of
ethanol bearing fuel. Ethanol goes back to the 80's it when was
called gasohol and car many car manufacturers warned against using it
because of deterioration of engine seals and rubber parts.
Ethanol results in poorer fuel consumption according to several
automotive publications tests. For us that means reduced range and
endurance since larger fuel tanks and greater weight aren't a very
good choice for us. Those same reports also mention the cost of
ethanol production being higher than gasoline. It is only profitable
because of Federal subsidies. The car manufacturers also receive
Federal subsidies for producing alternate fuel vehicles and ethanol is
the only immediately available alternate. Farmers enjoy higher corn
prices as well. The consumer pays for all of the subsidies as well as
higher prices for corn and beef which is fed with more expensive corn.
The government is taking care of us again.
Dennis
On Jan 29, 2008 9:44 AM, Joe Spencer
> wrote:
Anybody know how the 912s likes autofuel with ethanol in it? For
all the info that Rotax sends out on their engines I don't
remember seeing anything on this subject from them. Anyody got a
link or info?
Thx Joe
Sad but informative. Those of us using auto fuel in our airplane
motors
now have to consider many additional problems that alcohol causes and
it's not even good for cars! This was published today in the Atlanta
Journal-Constitution and written by the CEO of a petroleum
distributor
in Atlanta. Who is pushing ethanol? It's apparently not petroleum
companies.
Ron
*
*
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
_________________ Zenith 601XL, tail done, working on wings |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Al Hays
Joined: 01 Oct 2007 Posts: 42 Location: Gore, VA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:56 am Post subject: ethanol in autogas |
|
|
Larry,
I have to agree that ethanol is not the best answer (at least it's
better than methanol) and I think having government subsidies and
congressional mandates for its continued production from corn is
reprehensible. Nevertheless, I intend to make my engine and fuel
system capable of ingesting it when unavoidable. The February issue
of Popular Mechanics has an excellent Op-Ed on page 54 titled "The
Ethanol Fallacy". If a copy isn't handy, it is on the web at:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/earth/4237539.html
Al Hays
Do not archive
On Jan 29, 2008, at 11:18 AM, LarryMcFarland wrote:
Quote: |
<larry(at)macsmachine.com>
Dennis,
In addition to these problems, which are true enough, it takes 3
gallons of water to make one gallon of ethanol and the water tables
are going down where these processing
plants are located. The pollution from ethanol is a more serious
problem than gasoline and the only reason we're doing this is, as
you say, government support.
I won't buy an E85 vehicle or use that product and we've quit
buying beef, where possible, as a matter of principle.
Larry McFarland
do not archive
Dennis Shoup wrote:
> I recall reading a year ago that Rotax prohibits the use of
> ethanol bearing fuel. Ethanol goes back to the 80's it when was
> called gasohol and car many car manufacturers warned against using
> it because of deterioration of engine seals and rubber parts.
> Ethanol results in poorer fuel consumption according to
> several automotive publications tests. For us that means reduced
> range and endurance since larger fuel tanks and greater weight
> aren't a very good choice for us. Those same reports also mention
> the cost of ethanol production being higher than gasoline. It is
> only profitable because of Federal subsidies. The car
> manufacturers also receive Federal subsidies for producing
> alternate fuel vehicles and ethanol is the only immediately
> available alternate. Farmers enjoy higher corn prices as well.
> The consumer pays for all of the subsidies as well as higher
> prices for corn and beef which is fed with more expensive corn.
> The government is taking care of us again.
> Dennis
> On Jan 29, 2008 9:44 AM, Joe Spencer <jpspencer(at)cableone.net
> <mailto:jpspencer(at)cableone.net>> wrote:
>
> Anybody know how the 912s likes autofuel with ethanol in it? For
> all the info that Rotax sends out on their engines I don't
> remember seeing anything on this subject from them. Anyody got a
> link or info?
> Thx Joe
> Sad but informative. Those of us using auto fuel in our
> airplane
> motors
> now have to consider many additional problems that alcohol
> causes and
> it's not even good for cars! This was published today in the
> Atlanta
> Journal-Constitution and written by the CEO of a petroleum
> distributor
> in Atlanta. Who is pushing ethanol? It's apparently not petroleum
> companies.
> Ron
>
> *
> *
> *
> *
|
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
larry(at)macsmachine.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:03 pm Post subject: ethanol in autogas |
|
|
Al,
The article is accurate, but leaves out the fact that water used in
production is wasted and not getting back into the soil. The binder that
allows alcohol to blend with gasoline
and other mixes is the culprit which eats aluminum, resins and other
materials like cork and synthetic rubber. I'm not concerned in the long
run because ethanol will crumble of its own weight when the government
drops its subsidy. Batteries have made stunning progress the last 6
months which will have GM rethinking the expensive battery they've
contracted for the Volt. Three companies have revolutionized battery
technology to the point that 40 miles will be unacceptable and 200 will
be the the new
milestone for the next run of electric cars. Thermoelectric generators
will replace the alternator and Butanol will eventually replace ethanol
as a better product that's cheaper
to produce, is stable, is interchangeable and has equal performance
properties to gasoline. Good source for latest developments is
the Technology Review. see link,
http://www.technologyreview.com/index.aspx
Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com (Subaru and 87 octane /
10% mandated ethanol)
Al Hays wrote:
Quote: |
<alhays(at)hickoryhillfarmsheep.com>
Larry,
I have to agree that ethanol is not the best answer (at least it's
better than methanol) and I think having government subsidies and
congressional mandates for its continued production from corn is
reprehensible. Nevertheless, I intend to make my engine and fuel
system capable of ingesting it when unavoidable. The February issue
of Popular Mechanics has an excellent Op-Ed on page 54 titled "The
Ethanol Fallacy". If a copy isn't handy, it is on the web at:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/earth/4237539.html
Al Hays
Do not archive
On Jan 29, 2008, at 11:18 AM, LarryMcFarland wrote:
>
> <larry(at)macsmachine.com>
>
> Dennis,
> In addition to these problems, which are true enough, it takes 3
> gallons of water to make one gallon of ethanol and the water tables
> are going down where these processing
> plants are located. The pollution from ethanol is a more serious
> problem than gasoline and the only reason we're doing this is, as you
> say, government support.
> I won't buy an E85 vehicle or use that product and we've quit buying
> beef, where possible, as a matter of principle.
> Larry McFarland
> do not archive
>
> Dennis Shoup wrote:
>> I recall reading a year ago that Rotax prohibits the use of
>> ethanol bearing fuel. Ethanol goes back to the 80's it when was
>> called gasohol and car many car manufacturers warned against using
>> it because of deterioration of engine seals and rubber parts.
>> Ethanol results in poorer fuel consumption according to several
>> automotive publications tests. For us that means reduced range and
>> endurance since larger fuel tanks and greater weight aren't a very
>> good choice for us. Those same reports also mention the cost of
>> ethanol production being higher than gasoline. It is only
>> profitable because of Federal subsidies. The car manufacturers also
>> receive Federal subsidies for producing alternate fuel vehicles and
>> ethanol is the only immediately available alternate. Farmers enjoy
>> higher corn prices as well. The consumer pays for all of the
>> subsidies as well as higher prices for corn and beef which is fed
>> with more expensive corn.
>> The government is taking care of us again.
>> Dennis
|
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|