|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ultrastarrick(at)yahoo.co Guest
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 7:31 am Post subject: bent ultrastar |
|
|
I discoverd that landing in 4 foot tall hay field is not good on the ultrastar.
bent the nose and fliped on her back sould be fixed by the end of the week.
I was going to raze the nose 11 inch to make it paralel to flight any coments on this?
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
slyck(at)frontiernet.net Guest
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 8:01 am Post subject: bent ultrastar |
|
|
Rick, alfalfa is especially grabby. One foot is all you need.
(experienced in that department)
Check the photoshare archives for Ed Steuber's Ultra.
-BB do not archive
On 20, May 2006, at 11:09 AM, Rick Miles wrote:
Quote: |
I discoverd that landing in 4 foot tall hay field is not good on the
ultrastar.
bent the nose and fliped on her back sould be fixed by the end of
the week.
I was going to raze the nose 11 inch to make it paralel to flight
any coments on this?
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and
save big.
|
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Masqqqqqqq(at)AOL.COM Guest
|
Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 10:49 am Post subject: bent ultrastar |
|
|
For what it's worth, I got away with a successful forced landing in tall hay
by flaring just above the hay, holding off the landing until she stalled and
flopped down with the tail low. Full back stick at landing, and she didn't go
nose over. Didn't even bend the gear, but from the impact i'm surprised at
that.
If it happens again, I'm seriously going to consider pulling the BRS. I
think a chute replacement might be less costly than repairing damage caused
by flipping over.
do not archive
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JetPilot
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1246
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 8:25 am Post subject: Re: bent ultrastar |
|
|
Pulling the BRS for an engine failure is a bad idea. There is no guarantee of a good deployment, it can tangle in the prop etc. etc. The BRS is a good last resort, but only if there is no other way to save yourself, there are just to many things that can go very wrong in a BRS deployment. Now instead of maybe bending your airplane you may be looking at hitting the earth very out of control and losing your life
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!!
Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 2:28 am Post subject: bent ultrastar |
|
|
Pulling the BRS for an engine failure is a bad idea. >>
Hi,
surely this depends on what is underneath you. If there is a chance of even
a rough field landing I would agree but if you are over a pine forest it
might be a better proposition to drop vertically, comparatively slowly, than
to fly almost horizontally at 30 mph into the tree tops.
Tangling the shrouds in a stopped prop? Even worse to tangle them in a
revolving one..
Are chutes compulsory in the US?. I think they are in Germany but few people
in the UK fit them, mainly because of the weight.
Cheers
Pat
do not archive
--
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
pollus(at)fornerod.nl Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 11:08 am Post subject: bent ultrastar |
|
|
Yep. Chutes are compulsory for ultralights in Germany. Few years ago
they raised the MTOW from 450 to 472,5 kg to compensate for the
weight of the chute.
(Makes you wonder if they'll ever compensate for the weight of the
average German.)
Pollus
Op 24-mei-2006, om 12:24 heeft pat ladd het volgende geschreven:
Quote: |
[...]
Are chutes compulsory in the US?. I think they are in Germany but
few people
in the UK fit them, mainly because of the weight.
Cheers
Pat
do not archive
|
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|